Response to part 1:Toriver said:But that still implies that you hold the notion that only Americans are capable of taking such stupid comments seriously, which is a misconception that I'm trying to clear up. You mention that when people of other nationalities say things like this, you believe it's obvious they're joking. Well, perhaps, does it ever occur to you that:NinjaDeathSlap said:I never said there are no stupid people in the UK, I'm saying that I have never seen anything quite this bad from the residents of any other country, and if I have, it's been more than obvious that the people involved are joking, which I don't think is the case here.
A) People of other nationalities might NOT be joking
or
B) Americans may be joking too?
I'm just saying that the way you're describing your thought process comes off as a bit discriminatory when you read these kinds of things. It makes you sound as if some disaster struck Germany and you saw British comments like these saying "Take that you Germans, that's karma for the London bombings! Give 'em hell, nature!" you would assume it's a joke while here, you assume they mean it. That's kinda discriminatory, isn't it?
I'm not defending any part of what they're saying at all, and agree that it is absolutely despicable. I hope I don't sound like I am trying to defend their ideas. I'm just asserting the point that it really doesn't take a special kind of person to be such an asshole.Also, lets think about this for a minute. Yes Pearl Harbor sucked, but Japan had the two nukes, we had the Blitz, Russia had Stalingrad, Germany had Dresden. In regards to loss of innocent lives any damage to infrastructure, America got off pretty lightly out of WW2 compared to everybody else. So why have so many Americans not got over it yet when the rest of the world has had to. That's what WE'RE upset about.
They were Industrial towns (like London was) and would have been carpet bombed if they were reachable without heavy losses (like when England was bombing German targets). Kyoto and some other cities were taken off the inital LONG list due to lack of military importance and presences of historic structures.aegix drakan said:........Ok, that's just disgusting.
Also didn't the US already get their payback when they NUKED TWO INNOCENT CIVILIAN TOWNS?!
...Think the world forgot about THAT?
This was determined to be fake. The background in the picture shows the Gundam in Odaiba, its original location. It was since moved to Shizuoka, far from the epicenter of the earthquake, where it remains standing. The after photo there was taken during the Gundam's disassembly for transport to its new location.Jabberwock xeno said:Just get's worse and worse:
Seriously? The war ended a long time ago, do people for get we firebombed their population and finally nuked them, TWICE!Jonabob87 said:If this has already been brought up, do forgive but this has been brought to my attention:
*Link removed* (by the OP) People are sending messages to Facebook accounts apparently and that's also out of line.
Apparently there is a fair amount of Americans claiming that the Tsunami currently ravaging Japan can be seen as payback for an attack in WW2.
"getting a little more payback for peal harbour. they thought we forgot about that BS, didn't they?"
"Remember pearl harbour? Go tsunami go!"
Only two brief examples of a torrent of idiotic comments that seriously make one wonder where people get this crap from.
What are your thoughts, Escapists?
Aye. Such problems are complex, yet society demands to paint it all in black-and-white.Jammy2003 said:Not gonna lie, they were pretty horrific, but 2 words:brumley53 said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_crimesEico said:They are more complex. But the loss of life is never good.Woodsey said:Can we clear this up: Hiroshima and Nagasaki are far more complex issues than people on this thread are making out. They quite arguably saved far more lives than they took.Eico said:That was more like revenge than retribution.cyrogeist said:Dude...people are assholes and besides...weren't the NUKES payback?
[sub]Note that I'm not condoning either event, just pointing it out.[/sub]
The U.S was as big a monster as the enemy they were fighting.
The U.S. where the ones that kept this really hushed up as to not shame the country of Japan, Trust me those Nukes were no where near as bad as what Japan did in WW2.
I don't agree that "the tsunami is payback" but seriously Japan was as bad if not worse than Hitler and the Nazi's in WW2.
Guantanamo Bay
America is just as crap as most countries, hideous things happen in war and you could find an example of that for just about any country around. There is no excuse for this, Japan didn't gloat over Katrina (to my knowledge anyway), so who the hell gets off and enjoys laughing at others misery. Jokes can be in bad taste, a few months after the event, but not on the same damn day!
Ah, i get what you mean.Merkavar said:i think you miss understood what i was saying. i didnt say japan needed payback for pearl harbour. i was asking why people would think that japan needs payback for pearl harbour even after they were nuked twice. and like you said the nukes were overkill so if anything japan owes the us some payback.EllEzDee said:Pearl Harbour needed payback? Pearl Harbour was just a military manoeuvre, it didn't need payback. The nukes were just an overkill attempt at forcing them into surrender.Merkavar said:wouldnt the 2 nukes droped on japan been enough payback for pearl harbour?
It's great to see all the uneducated 13 year old Call of Duty playing Americans still thinking the Japs are evil for their role in the war.
i hope that 13 year old cod playing comment wasnt aimed at me cause again i didnt say the japanese are evil.