basically it was "oh look! this guy wants to be my BF I've always wanted a BF...or at least that's what I'm supposed to want" then to "uggghh this actually requires effort and emotional resources and now he wants to have sex with me, dear lord"Bat Vader said:This just makes me curious.
Not at all. I don't know if this is a regular reaction or not, but I've never felt threatened by gay men, even gay men attracted to me. It's no different than women who are attracted to me, that I don't find attractive. Most of them were simply co-workers at jobs, so it wasn't anything really major. We didn't have an active social life together. One guy was a classmate from higschool that I bumped into years later, and he just asked me out. I never saw him again after that, but that was simply because we were never in the same circle of friends to begin with.Silvanus said:Out of totally-not-relevant-to-me-I-swear interest, how did it affect your relationships with those guys?Happyninja42 said:With the guys, it was pretty simple. "Thanks man, but I'm not gay." "Oh! I'm so sorry! I didn't mean to..." "No no, it's cool, no offense taken, I just don't swing that way." These were all gay friends, or gay coworkers, who thought I was. I think because of a combination of genuinely not being bothered by their sexual orientation, and possibly because at times during that period in my life, I was wearing fingernail polish, sometimes wearing lipstick, and also wearing an earring that looked like the Bajorian earrings from Star Trek. (chain connecting the lobe to the ridge)
Since this is the Escapist, I'll try and not be too judgemental in regards to Hentai - but I will say that most of that shit is either really fucked up or catering towards an extremely socially insecure (or particularly inexperienced) male. Watching Hentai is probably not a good sign either way, I'd say; but maybe that is my prejudice talking.Eclipse Dragon said:Assuming they're watching porn because they aren't happy with their partner's performance[footnote]Although I don't personally believe this is the case most of the time[/footnote], it's still preferable than them going out and finding someone temporary who can perform to their satisfaction.
The partner who feels inadequate can always spice up the love life by watching it together, imagine the surprise "What are you doing watching this raunchy anime!?.... scoot over, let me see".
-----------------------
It's led me to rethink what I'm personally looking for in a relationship, I think I've grown for it, I just wish I had realized sooner and saved myself some pain.
And what, exactly, makes you so sure everyone's turned down someone else at some point?s0denone said:Many times. First time was when a good friend of my sister asked me to be her boyfriend in maybe the 6th grade.
I don't see any issue at all, and I don't really know what this topic is about or what purpose it serves. I'm sure we have all turned someone down at some point.
These days I am not single, so I have to turn down the low-hanging fruit at bars on the regular, when I'm out. Makes me feel good though, when women hit on me, as I'm sure it would anyone else.
Well, that would evidently just be conjecture on my part.Jack Action said:And what, exactly, makes you so sure everyone's turned down someone else at some point?
Nightclub or no, being hit on requires one to be at least somewhat attractive, which a fair amount of people, even though not most, aren't.s0denone said:Well, that would evidently just be conjecture on my part.
I surmise perhaps not everyone has, but at least where I live (Denmark) there's just about at least one for everyone, if you're looking, and most people are ;-)
If you don't go looking for it though, I suppose it may be difficult - but I think just about everyone, assuming they hit the nightclubs once in a while, will experience the option to do it sooner rather than later!
If we are talking in an workplace-environment or about in our daily lives, it much more random and less reliable.
Hah, I don't know about that. In my experience your own attractivesness merely changes the attractiveness of the one hitting on you, whereas the way you carry yourself plays a major role in whether you are being approached on not.Jack Action said:Nightclub or no, being hit on requires one to be at least somewhat attractive, which a fair amount of people, even though not most, aren't.s0denone said:Well, that would evidently just be conjecture on my part.
I surmise perhaps not everyone has, but at least where I live (Denmark) there's just about at least one for everyone, if you're looking, and most people are ;-)
If you don't go looking for it though, I suppose it may be difficult - but I think just about everyone, assuming they hit the nightclubs once in a while, will experience the option to do it sooner rather than later!
If we are talking in an workplace-environment or about in our daily lives, it much more random and less reliable.
Oh, come now, few are going to hit on the 1s, 2s, 3s, and 4s, even others of the same... level, if you will, and I'm well aware that being blunt about this might be considered cruel.s0denone said:Hah, I don't know about that. In my experience your own attractivesness merely changes the attractiveness of the one hitting on you, whereas the way you carry yourself plays a major role in whether you are being approached on not.
Maybe I should recant my previous statement, though. Maybe the stereotypical "Escapist Member" hasn't been hit on, though I would naturally hope otherwise!
I also disagree that "not most" people aren't attractive. I think the average girl is like a 5-6 on the scale 1-10 scale, which I suppose could be classified as "mildly attractive"? Men would be the same.
Generally the problem with people spending too much time on their computer is that they have a tendency of being overweight. You don't even have to be desperately skinny or slim - just average, to qualify as a 5 or 6 for some people. Everything comes down to taste anyway, and there are plenty of chubby-chasing women![]()
I agree generally people don't go for people that look like they were just diving around the dumpster in a dank back-alley, but if we are toying with the idea that an average person is a 5-6, then I postulate that those people, were they to actually go to a nightclub with a couple mates and not act like social outcasts, would get hit on.Jack Action said:Oh, come now, few are going to hit on the 1s, 2s, 3s, and 4s, even others of the same... level, if you will, and I'm well aware that being blunt about this might be considered cruel.
Hey I know where you're coming from. I've lost about ~20 pounds over the past year myself by changing my diet and starting to work out more regularly. I hope you go for itAlso, I was just getting the feeling my ass looks a smidge too big. Maybe it's the pants.
Err... okay?Burned Hand said:Most will be 5's, but almost as many will be 4's and 6's. That's how Gaussian distributions work.
Bah. BAH, I SAY! I can't argue this without being an overly pedantic knobhead. Well played, sir, well played.s0denone said:I agree generally people don't go for people that look like they were just diving around the dumpster in a dank back-alley, but if we are toying with the idea that an average person is a 5-6, then I postulate that those people, were they to actually go to a nightclub with a couple mates and not act like social outcasts, would get hit on.
Thus I reach the conclusion that the average person has been hit on.
...hey, it was a good opportunity for a bad joke.Also, I was just getting the feeling my ass looks a smidge too big. Maybe it's the pants.
Hey I know where you're coming from. I've lost about ~20 pounds over the past year myself by changing my diet and starting to work out more regularly. I hope you go for it![]()
I know what it meant, I just don't see your point.Burned Hand said:Sorry, I edited too late.
![]()
The bell curve, the "normal distribution" is the basis of 1-10 ratings systems. You can see what I meant from that image I think?
Well, you get props for having the most roundabout way of saying "no, actually most people will get hit on" imaginable. Which is technically true, I guess, because assuming 5s get hit on too, that means 5s and up get hit on and in total there's more 5s and higher than 4s and lower.Burned Hand said:Uh... that you're overstating the number of 5's relative to the number of 4's and 6's. More, that most of your total population falls in that range, with the outliers (1's, 2's, 9's and 10's) being rare freaks. Emphasis on RARE.