TV Today: Why is all the scifi so dark and depressing?

mindlesspuppet

New member
Jun 16, 2004
780
0
0
All Scifi these days is dark and depressing because for some reason unknown to me BSG was a huge success.

The worst thing was probably Stargate Universe, they tried to turn Stargate into something it just shouldn't have been, it was terrible and it got canceled.

I miss X-files. It could be as fun and quirky as SG-1, or as deadly series as it needed to be.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
Housebroken Lunatic said:
I think it's a positive progression actually. Of course you're going to have a lot of failures that end up being unintentionally funny, at the very least some decent "sci fi-noir" productions might come out of it.

Given the choice between "Star Wars" sci-fi and Alien/Terminator/Blade Runner-style sci-fi, Star Wars will ALWAYS lose in my book. The "darkness" of space and the future somehow makes more sense than the "bright and shiny" crap. :p
The ironic thing about this statement is that Alien actually took the grimy, used future of Star Wars and ran with it; if you want bright and shiny, you might find it in Star Trek, but not Star Wars. That said, there's a difference between dark, and dark and depressing -- or what many people call "grimdark." The new Battlestar Galactica was dark and depressing, Blade Runner is just dark. Alien and Terminator both have their dark moments, but they aren't in the same league of darkness as Blade Runner, let alone Battlestar Galactica. Besides, both The Terminator and Alien were horror films, and the sequels were much lighter action films, with a sci-fi streak running through the entirety of both series.

Basically, the lack of camp in modern sci-fi and fantasy is only part of what I'm talking about; that's really difficult to do right, otherwise the Syfy channel movies would be some of my favorites. What I'm really after is the occasional series that doesn't make me walk away feeling depressed; is it really too much to ask for the occasional uplifting moment? Zeta Gundam, and the UC continuity in general, are really good at doing this. The subject matter is as dark as it can get, but every now and then, the show takes a moment to show us what the characters are fighting for, how wonderful it is, and how not everything is death and destruction. Without these moments of light, a dark series quickly becomes an exercise in showing depressed people doing depressing things, and committing various unforgivable atrocities in the process. Is that really what we want?
 

Phlakes

Elite Member
Mar 25, 2010
4,282
0
41
You know, if you look at each Star Trek series, the ship keeps getting darker the more recent you get. Even the Enterprise E has a much darker bridge than the D.
 

maturin

New member
Jul 20, 2010
702
0
0
Because in the several decades since the optimistic creation that was Star Trek we've realized that advanced technology can't solve humanity's social or even material problems. Anything too sunny falls flat.

Plus, gritty 'realism' is in, as I'm sure you've heard Yahtzee complaining about. And our culture has been militarized for so long that it's our imaginative DNA. It ain't gonna be the peace corps that explores Venus, and the color scheme on the moon base isn't going to be cheery and feminine.
 

badgersprite

[--SYSTEM ERROR--]
Sep 22, 2009
3,820
0
0
Same reason as video games and a lot of comic books, I think. They're trying to ape a mistaken idea of "maturity" or "realism" and I guess they think the only way they'll be taken seriously as a genre is to be grim and gritty.

My counter argument that the closest SciFi has ever gotten to being taken seriously by mainstream society and media was TNG in the US and Doctor Who in the UK (if you don't count comedies like Red Dwarf). Grim and dark isn't what comes to mind when I think of these series, even when bad things happen on the show. There's still a fundamental idealism and charm about the two series (although I know less about the recent Doctor Who).

DS9 was darker, sure, but it wasn't dark for the sake of being dark, and it certainly wasn't bleak or "gritty". It's only really perceived as dark for Trek because it liked to tell complex character driven stories that suited the situation, unlike, say, Enterprise, whose attempts at being "realistic" and "adult" wound up making for some pretty dumb episodes of television, an inconsistent tone, and characters that didn't make sense (they seriously have a chief engineer who can't do math. That's not "realism"; that's silly!)
 

flim.geek.chic

New member
Oct 22, 2009
313
0
0
as a fellow Doctor Who fan I understand the whole not liking Scifi's that turn them selves in to soap opera's thing. However it's the depressing shows that make the fun shows seem more fun. You know like the yin and yang theroy.
 

black_omega2

New member
Jun 2, 2009
156
0
0
You haven't seen dark sci-fi until they make a 40k TV show...
/ponders statement
...Oh dear God Emperor what have I done

IMHO I prefer 'darker' sci-fi anyhow, so I don't see it as a problem. They tend to be more intelligent in my experience.
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,544
0
0
Owyn_Merrilin said:
The ironic thing about this statement is that Alien actually took the grimy, used future of Star Wars and ran with it; if you want bright and shiny, you might find it in Star Trek, but not Star Wars.
What are you referring to now? Looks/design or theme?

I might agree on some of the looks/design on spaceships and such, but when it comes to theme I can't agree that Star Wars is just as dark as Alien or that it was Ridley Scott's intention. This is most easily illustrated to how the respective franchises deals with aliens. In Star Wars they are for the most part allies and friends of humans, they have cultures, language, ways of life etc. In Alien, the aliens are portrayed as... Well ALIEN. I.e incomperhensible, frightening, Lovecraftian (just the way I like my aliens. I hate aliens who are way too antropomorphic and "unalien" in sci-fi).

And that's what I mean when I say that Alien is dark/grimy while Star Wars is "bright and shiny". In Star Wars, the alien nature of the universe is something that can be talked to and reasoned with to some extent. The Xenomorphs from Alien however can't be bargained or reasoned with. They seem animalistic, but they display way too much intelligence to be simple animals so it's clear that they have motives and agenda but ones that are way too alien to understand and that doesn't include human beings as anything else than a source of meat to implant offspring into.

Owyn_Merrilin said:
That said, there's a difference between dark, and dark and depressing -- or what many people call "grimdark." The new Battlestar Galactica was dark and depressing, Blade Runner is just dark. Alien and Terminator both have their dark moments, but they aren't in the same league of darkness as Blade Runner, let alone Battlestar Galactica. Besides, both The Terminator and Alien were horror films, and the sequels were much lighter action films, with a sci-fi streak running through the entirety of both series.
I don't mind depressing as long as it is done properly. The trouble with Battlestar Galactica was that it was way too boring to watch. (at least to me)

Also, I disagree when you say that The Terminator isn't in the same league as Blade Runner when it comes to darkness. Of course im not refering to the sequels (because, aside from perhaps the Sarah Connor Chronicles, the sequels are way too comedic and action-oriented to be as good as the original). The original is, like you said, a horror story, and also very film noir in many ways (James Cameron came up with the term "tech noir" which is pretty approriate).

So the difference between Blade Runner and The Terminator isn't really in levels of grimdarkness but more about the level of philosophical thoughts and the use of symbolism. The Terminator is pretty much "in your face" with a simple but at the same time horrifying concept, as well as a sense of impending doom. Blade Runner is more into philosophy and symbolism, but they are both equally dark and serious.

Owyn_Merrilin said:
Basically, the lack of camp in modern sci-fi and fantasy is only part of what I'm talking about; that's really difficult to do right, otherwise the Syfy channel movies would be some of my favorites. What I'm really after is the occasional series that doesn't make me walk away feeling depressed; is it really too much to ask for the occasional uplifting moment? Zeta Gundam, and the UC continuity in general, are really good at doing this. The subject matter is as dark as it can get, but every now and then, the show takes a moment to show us what the characters are fighting for, how wonderful it is, and how not everything is death and destruction. Without these moments of light, a dark series quickly becomes an exercise in showing depressed people doing depressing things, and committing various unforgivable atrocities in the process. Is that really what we want?
Yes! :)

At least that's what I want. As you might imagine, im a fan of hard sci-fi first and foremost and not too much space opera or lighthearted "space discovery" stuff.

Of course I am a huge Warhammer 40.000 buff, which is somewhat of a space opera, but it's overflowed with grimdark to satisfy my tastes. I especially enjoy the fact that humans in WH40K aren't portrayed as the "ultimate good guys" in the setting, but are actually some of the most militaristic, oppressive dicks in the galaxy, making some of the alien species seem a lot more appealing (like the Tau). But for some reason, you root for these militaristic assholes anyway because you can sympathize with them in a strange way, since pretty much every horror imaginable in the galaxy is out to get them.
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,544
0
0
black_omega2 said:
You haven't seen dark sci-fi until they make a 40k TV show...
/ponders statement
...Oh dear God Emperor what have I done
You're not the first to think it. Here's my dream of a 40K TV-show:

Think Band of Brothers BUT instead of following around some soldiers in world war 2, we get to follow Commissar Ibram Gaunt and his Ghosts instead. :)

A trilogy roughly the same length as the Lord of the Rings movies featuring the exploits of Inquisitor Eisenhorn would also be nice.

Oh well, a man can dream...
 

black_omega2

New member
Jun 2, 2009
156
0
0
Housebroken Lunatic said:
black_omega2 said:
You haven't seen dark sci-fi until they make a 40k TV show...
/ponders statement
...Oh dear God Emperor what have I done
You're not the first to think it. Here's my dream of a 40K TV-show:

Think Band of Brothers BUT instead of following around some soldiers in world war 2, we get to follow Commissar Ibram Gaunt and his Ghosts instead. :)

A trilogy roughly the same length as the Lord of the Rings movies featuring the exploits of Inquisitor Eisenhorn would also be nice.

Oh well, a man can dream...
I realize I'm not the first, but I was thinking more along the lines of Chaos. There's no way they could air that on TV XD
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,544
0
0
black_omega2 said:
I realize I'm not the first, but I was thinking more along the lines of Chaos. There's no way they could air that on TV XD
Aww, come on. If they could air shows like Deadwood, Dexter, Oz, Spartacus: Blood and Sand etc.

Then really, could the blood and gore of a 40K-show really top that depravity?

Then again, I guess the worst part wouldn't be the blood and violence but the romantic portrayal of xenophobia, oppressive and militaristic regimes, caricaturizations of the catholic church etc.

I mean in Gaunts Ghosts the hero of the story pretty much looks like a full blown nazi when in uniform.

Moral panic would ensue. :p
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Nimcha said:
Because space is dark and depressing.
I can understand dark, but where's the depressing part come in? It's the universe, one big giant fireworks display. It brings about cries of "Oooh" and "Ahhh".
 

NaramSuen

New member
Jun 8, 2010
261
0
0
The current "dark and depressing" phase, is just that a phase. BSG built upon the success of earlier darker, edgier SF series and was hugely successful; as a result, everyone is copying the formula. Part of the motive to move SF into a darker place is a desire on the part of the creators to take SF out of its supposed ghetto and earn mainstream respect. SF has always dealt with realistic, mature themes, but the current batch of SF is under the false impression that dark and depressing are a prerequisite for exploring these themes.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
BobDobolina said:
-Boldly going where all text has gone before-
You're takking that way too seriously, my man. If man really cared about the theory of relativity when going out in space, he never would've gone in the first place. Suffice to say, the idea that space is depressing or woeful or a teast or whatever is kind of ridiculous in the first place, as it has inspired many to wonder just by being there. Seriously, there is how much science fiction about space and things in space? Lots. There is how much study and philosophy and such-like about space and things in space? Lots. That's evidence of people taking an interest. They're not taking an interest because space is depressing. They're taking it because space is COOL.
 

Motti

New member
Jan 26, 2009
739
0
0
I think it's mostly because emo is in lately, and because bright 'n shiny sci fi like star trek has gone out of style, as well as being a tad unrealistic. Think of the cleaning bills!
 

Plinglebob

Team Stupid-Face
Nov 11, 2008
1,815
0
0
First, to the OP, I don't care if you haven't had a chance to watch an episode, go out and buy Farscape now.

OT: Sadly, it doesn't seem to be just Sci-Fi thats having this problem. It seems a lot of programs have slowly lost the fun side of them, but Sci-Fi is the only one that has an obvious turning point in BSG. I think part of it is the whole True Art Is Angsty [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TrueArtIsAngsty] problem, but also people are trying to be more "Realistic" in how people act and for some reason writers think that all people do it complain, mope around and be generally depressing without being allowed to have any fun.
 

Frotality

New member
Oct 25, 2010
982
0
0
well darker and edgier is the media trend right now, and since all the fantastic voyages and star treks weve found that space isnt full of giant clouds of negative energy or space gods, but a whole lot of nothing. as science has made space alot more boring then it was back in the day, the appeal of traveling the unknown has died down as more and more stuff about space becomes known. its the same reason we dont have any more tales of adventure like lost world or gulliver's travels; were once there was unknown, know theres just rocks.

now its only interdimensional travel that remains sufficiently unknown, which is why stargate is probably our last hope for sci-fi that isnt just bleak modern society in space.
 

Jazzyjazz2323

New member
Jan 19, 2010
645
0
0
Well for me personally I enjoy dark scifi and absolutely hate pretty and clean utopia scifi,IT BORES ME.Star Trek has always been something I couldn't get along with because it wasn't dark enough.Really though when it comes down to it for me there are really 3 type of people,People who want the future to be like warhammer 40k,people who want the future to be like star wars, and then people who want the future to be like Star Trek.I fall into the first category.