TheIronRuler said:
AlAaraaf74 said:
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.
Oral sex between sisters ==> Technically sex ==> Technically WINcest
No experience with super sexy sisters, but I can say threesomes are a two-headed coin.
On one hand, two partners equals twice the naughty bits to play with, and two dirty minds are usually better than one. If you're into a bit of kink - I am - the sister thing could be interesting... you know, like, once or twice. Incestuous lesbian sisters are not long term relationship material.
On the other hand, another person adds more 'work' needed to ensure everyone is getting theirs, so to speak. Its not a big issue during some drunken fling, but anything over the long term is likely going to get old fast. If you're the 'I got mine!' kinda person, then that wont really be an issue.
What CAN be an issue during a fling is relationship crap... Jealousy is rarely in short supply, and adding a third partner to the sexual mix can really bring that out of some people.
Jealousy -> Distrust -> End of the relationship
Now there's some logic for ya.
Speaking as a straight male, I can't say I'd be comfortable with another guy entering the mix, for one simple reason: Penis to Vagina Ratio.
1:1 Classic
1:2 YAY, TEAMWORK!
2:1 Ew... Teamwork...
1:3+ Don't know where to start...
3+:1 Are those guys roasting a pig?-gGGGOHMIGAWDTHATPOORGIRL!