Twin Threesome Fantasy

New Frontiersman

New member
Feb 2, 2010
785
0
0
I was exchanging messages with a friend one evening, when my friend mentioned a pair of twins she once knew. I took the opportunity to imply an interest in these twins, all in good fun of course, she brought up and it got me thinking why are guys so into twins as a sexual fantasy?

Now of course I understand the carnal desire for multiple sexual partners for the sake of (I assume) enhanced pleasure, or an increased feeling of masculinity, or even approval from ones male peers. But I do wonder, why twins, specifically? Or even sisters? As far as threesome fantasies go, why is that a familial relationship between the two partners makes things so much different? What's so special about having a sexual encounter with sisters or twins that is different from a sexual encounter with two unrelated, but still equally attractive women?
Also I wonder what do the males in the audience tonight think of the so-called "twin threesome fantasy", does it entice you? Repulse you? Are you indifferent?

Actually this led to another thought too. Having never been in a threesome (with twins or otherwise) I wonder what the big deal is. I mean, and again, I understand the general theory behind it, double the women should equal double the pleasure; gives you something to brag about back at the frat house, etc. etc. But in practice does any of this hold water? Does having multiple partners increase sexual satisfaction in men? Have any of my readers ever had a sexual threesome, and if so how did you find the experience? Were you satisfied with it?

I suppose it wouldn't be fair if I didn't include the women of the Escapist to answer, so ladies what do you think of the idea of a threesome? Do you find the idea of having sex with two men at the same time sexually arousing? How about a man and another woman? Do you find the idea of a sexual encounter with twins or siblings intriguing or repulsive? If you were in a committed relationship would you enter into a threesome with your significant other and a third party in order to spice things up? Would you instigate one? I suppose the last two questions could also be posed to the guys as well.

To the gays, lesbians, and bisexuals in our audience how does the idea of a threesome affect you? If you were gay and your partner were bisexual would you be open to a threesome with a member of the opposite sex if it would make your partner happy?

I really hadn't intended for this post to get this long when I started, it also went in a different direction then what I had originally intended. And still there's really a lot more I could expand upon in this thread there are almost in infinite number of possibilities and combinations I could discuss or ask about, but I hardly have the time. So I leave to you all now. What are your opinions and experiences on the matter Escapists? Feel free to discuss in any way you feel comfortable, and of course bring up points I hadn't thought of or didn't point out. I'm excited to hear what you have to say. Please keep it in good taste though.
 

AlAaraaf74

New member
Dec 11, 2010
523
0
0
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
 

TheIronRuler

New member
Mar 18, 2011
4,283
0
0
AlAaraaf74 said:
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.
 

Avatar Roku

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6,169
0
0
TheIronRuler said:
AlAaraaf74 said:
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.
Technically being the operative term.
 

TheIronRuler

New member
Mar 18, 2011
4,283
0
0
Avatar Roku said:
TheIronRuler said:
AlAaraaf74 said:
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.
Technically being the operative term.
You can replace it with the word "By definition". It's not Incest.
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Avatar Roku said:
TheIronRuler said:
AlAaraaf74 said:
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.
Technically being the operative term.
Hermes Conrad said:
"You are technically right, The best kind of right!"
Honestly on both threesomes as well as twins/sisters, its really one of those things that is hard to judge until youve experienced it yourself.
 

major28

New member
Feb 25, 2010
459
0
0
Avatar Roku said:
TheIronRuler said:
AlAaraaf74 said:
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.
Technically being the operative term.
Technically "not" was the operative word in that sentence.
 

Avatar Roku

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6,169
0
0
TheIronRuler said:
Avatar Roku said:
TheIronRuler said:
AlAaraaf74 said:
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.
Technically being the operative term.
You can replace it with the word "By definition". It's not Incest.
You're Rules Lawyering. [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RulesLawyer] Yes, by definition, it is not sex. However, society defines it otherwise, and I feel that is more relevant.
major28 said:
Avatar Roku said:
TheIronRuler said:
AlAaraaf74 said:
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.
Technically being the operative term.
Technically "not" was the operative word in that sentence.
You know what I mean.
 

Mr.Squishy

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,990
0
0
This is incredibly juvenile, but when you mentioned gay people and threesomes, I thought of...well...let's call it a choo-choo train...
I both laughed and winced at that...
 

teisjm

New member
Mar 3, 2009
3,561
0
0
Why settle for twin sisters? go for the familly package: hot girl, her hot mom, and hot grandmom.
The family package offers not only a foursome, more female than you can possibly handle, fresh young meat, the thrilling experience of an experienced partner, something to brag about at the frat house, plus the awesome war fuzzy feeling you get inside by knowing you've brought a familly closely together, by letting them bond in a way not many famillies can brag about.
Just make sure all 3 generations are single, you wouldn't wanna be the reson for the poor girl having both her parents and grandparents split up.

In all seriousness, i'd rather have 2 different girls, than twins. Even if they weren't sisters but just looked extremely much alike.
Diversity ftw.
 

Waaghpowa

Needs more Dakka
Apr 13, 2010
3,073
0
0
viranimus said:
Hermes Conrad said:
"You are technically right, The best kind of right!"
Honestly on both threesomes as well as twins/sisters, its really one of those things that is hard to judge until youve experienced it yourself.
Actually that was Bureaucratic Agent number 1.0......but who's checking? :p
 

Gralian

Me, I'm Counting
Sep 24, 2008
1,789
0
0
On a biological level? It might actually have something to do with some kind of thought process that goes along the lines of "I have chosen this sexual partner to potentially birth my offspring because i believe they are of superior breeding stock. If there is another present who is of the exact same genetic make-up, the chances of producing healthy offspring is doubled". Or something like that, anyway. Obviously we don't think of knocking up every sexual partner but that's looking it it from the pure primal baser instinct level.