Twin Threesome Fantasy

[CJSinc]

Maybe its just me, (im often told i have no soul)
But i genuinely do not understand what is wrong with incest, so long as a child is not made, whats the problem? :/

 

[TheIronRuler]

I have actually never heard of this twin threesome fantasy and its kind of creepy.

I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.

Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.

That depends entirely on how you define the word sex.

Well, sex=intercourse, and that requires penetration. None of that between women, unless you... um... you know.

I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.

Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.

You know in the 1200s two nuns were found not guilty by a christian court of being lesbians and of breaking their vow of not to have sex. They got off because the priests were too ignorant to know that you can have sex without a penis.

Shocking that some people to this day don't understand that.

That's great, Do you have any other 'facts' I can't check nor have any knowledge of designed to make me look bad?

 

[Macheteswordgun]

Been there done that, don't do it, it might have unforseen consequences

 

[TheIronRuler]

I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.

Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.

Technically being the operative term.

You can replace it with the word "By definition". It's not Incest.

Does that mean that "by definition" a woman cannot rape another woman?

Rape has a legal definition and a literal definition.
Which is:
1. the unlawful compelling of a person through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse.
2.
any act of sexual intercourse that is forced upon a person.
.
Sexual Intercourse is Coitus, but your phrasing of the law could also include other cases in which a woman would rape another woman or a worman would rape a man. Ours has both in the law, though the latter option hardly gets to court.

 

[Owen Robertson]

It's incest, ergo disgusting and wrong. Threesomes (or however many floats your boat) are fine so long as there is no family involved. It would also make the interactions awkward.

Not that I'm saying your wrong, but what makes all incest intrinsically "disgusting and wrong". As long as genetically mutated babies aren't produced from the act and no one is hurt or coerced into doing it, what makes incest intrinsically wrong?

Again I'm not saying you're wrong, I just want to see the logic or justification behind your statement.
=

Yeah, I'm not FOR incest by any means, but I don't give a fuck what anyone wants to do in their bedroom. So if some family members like getting it on, who are we to demonize their relationship?

Fucks: I don't give 'em!

 

[Owen Robertson]

Honestly. I think I could have sex with two siblings. Guy siblings. As long as they didn't touch eachother though, or do anything incesty, the focus would have to be completely on them tag teaming me.

I've got brothers and I'd tag team a girl with either of them. It'd just be fuckin' the girl though, so give us a call Blore.

 

[Cheesus333]

Pretty disturbing as a concept for me, to be honest. I'm not speaking from a wealth of experience here, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Understatement] but I'm pretty sure that if I ever got in a position where two related women (twin sisters, in this scenario) were willing to have sex with me at the same time, the only thing I'd be able to picture would be them growing up together. And unless you're this guy [http://www.blogcdn.com/www.urlesque.com/media/2009/11/pedobear.jpg], that's gonna be a bit of a turn off. And thus, a moment killer.

Hell, maybe I just can't enjoy the simple things like that. I'm not gonna frown upon anyone who can, but it ain't for me.

 

[WolfThomas]

I don't really find the whole threesome idea apealling. Two girls two much effort, two guys, someone is probably far more involved than the other guy. Two twins or hell even sisters is weird.

 

[Shadowkire]

"You are technically right, The best kind of right!"

Hermes never said that. It was his boss no. 1.0.

God, I feel nerdy right now.

And it wasn't right, it was correct!

[edit]

You're both wrong, the quote is: "You're technically correct, the best kind of correct"

He beat me to it, well done sir.

 

[Bane_Star]

Threesomes Smeesomes,

Heres my experience:
Either the girls aren't that interested in the idea, means your doing all the work = impossible to be 2 men at once.
The girls are competitive, which can be interesting to some, but for me was a turn off.. fighting over who gets the finish? WTF?
The girls are bi- and forget your even there, they get it on and push you away..
The girls are actually lesbians and .. well, your on your own.
The girls are paid to do it, sure, you get all the attention, but it COSTS!

Twins.. well, due to the above experience, I dated separately.. they both knew, and once did a swap.. mid coitus.. I didn't know til morning. But I felt betrayed..

Now a seven-some with six Filipino girls in a night club.. THATS an experience..

 

[Cowabungaa]

Well, sex=intercourse, and that requires penetration. None of that between women, unless you... um... you know.

The legal definition speaks of "acts of sexual intercourse", and if that would just mean penetration women could never be convicted of rape. It's pretty obvious that sexual acts encompass more than just penetration, among them acts that sisters can perform on each other, making them incestual sexual acts. Yay logic indeed.

And that's exactly the reason why the twin fantasy makes me go "Ew ew ew get it out of my face." 2 Girls who are close blood relations, grew up together and are doing all kinds of naughty things? Gross.

Honestly. I think I could have sex with two siblings. Guy siblings. As long as they didn't touch eachother though, or do anything incesty, the focus would have to be completely on them tag teaming me.

In that case they're not performing any sexual acts on each other, making it a whole 'nother ballgame. Hehehe...ballgame...

 

[FalloutJack]

Threesome? With two girls, fine. If it's a guy and a girl, I'm fine as long as we're doing her. I'm open-minded, but other people gotta be open-minded to understand I don't do guys.

 

[idodo35]

i think that because its way dirtyer it turns some people on i myself probably never will do a threesome with someone i care for and not just with anyone unless its 2 girls and ill NEVER see them again also i wont care for them...

 

[TheIronRuler]

Well, sex=intercourse, and that requires penetration. None of that between women, unless you... um... you know.

The legal definition speaks of "acts of sexual intercourse", and if that would just mean penetration women could never be convicted of rape. It's pretty obvious that sexual acts encompass more than just penetration, among them acts that sisters can perform on each other, making them incestual sexual acts. Yay logic indeed.

And that's exactly the reason why the twin fantasy makes me go "Ew ew ew get it out of my face." 2 Girls who are close blood relations, grew up together and are doing all kinds of naughty things? Gross.

Honestly. I think I could have sex with two siblings. Guy siblings. As long as they didn't touch eachother though, or do anything incesty, the focus would have to be completely on them tag teaming me.

In that case they're not performing any sexual acts on each other, making it a whole 'nother ballgame. Hehehe...ballgame...

The Legal definition and the Oxford definition isn't alway the same because the legal definition of rape needs to encompass some other illegal activities under one banner.

 

[ReservoirAngel]

I'd find it weird above all else. Mostly because yeah, in my mind that would be incest and call me crazy, but that's kind of where I draw the line.

 

[Vault101]

I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.

Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.

and what do you call that thing that lesbians do? "cuddling"?

...I really shouldnt be on this thread in the first place....

 

[Thaluikhain]

Well, sex=intercourse, and that requires penetration. None of that between women, unless you... um... you know.

That's very heteronormative of you. Sex includes all sorts of things other than a dick going in something.

 

[similar.squirrel]

Variety is the spice of life. In the highly unlikely event that I ever get into a threesome, I would prefer to other participants to be visually diverse. And not related.

 

[TheIronRuler]

Well, sex=intercourse, and that requires penetration. None of that between women, unless you... um... you know.

Are you really trying to say that its not sex unless it involves a man? Because if you are that is an incredibly sexist thing to say.

Well, sex=intercourse, and that requires penetration. None of that between women, unless you... um... you know.

That's very heteronormative of you. Sex includes all sorts of things other than a dick going in something.

Damn it, people, read the dictionary.
Oxford Dictionary, Third Edition 2003 tells me that Sex is:
(also formal coitus; intercourse; sexual intercourse) the physical act in which the sexual organs of two people touch and which can result in a woman having a baby: to have sex with somebody ; sex education in schools.
.
Do you see my point now?

 

[Nimcha]

Well, sex=intercourse, and that requires penetration. None of that between women, unless you... um... you know.

That's very heteronormative of you. Sex includes all sorts of things other than a dick going in something.

Shhh, it's fine! Let's just keep that definition, I wanna see what happens when I come up to the gates of heaven and it shows I'm both gay and a virgin. I want to know which one is more important to the guy!