U.S. Military Bans Medal of Honor From On-Base Stores

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
U.S. Military Bans Medal of Honor From On-Base Stores


GameStop won't be carrying Medal of Honor [http://www.amazon.com/Medal-Honor-Limited-Pc/dp/B002ZJPYHS/ref=sr_1_3?s=videogames&ie=UTF8&qid=1283528663&sr=1-3] in any of its store located on U.S. military bases, the company said, "out of respect for our past and present men and women in uniform."

The inclusion of the Taliban as a playable faction in the multiplayer component of the new Medal of Honor has stirred up no small amount of controversy. it's only a game [http://www.ea.com]" justification, and most consumers will be able to pick up the game, Taliban and all, without any trouble when it comes out next month. But for gamers who also happen to be active members of the military, it'll be a trickier proposition.

The Army and Air Force Exchange Services has said that the game will not be sold in any of the 49 GameStop stores located on military bases in the U.S., or in PX operations anywhere else in the world. Military personnel in the U.S. will still be able to pop down to the local mall and pick up a copy of the game but those deployed to places like Afghanistan and Iraq will simply have to do without.

"Out of respect to those we serve, we will not be stocking this game," Kotaku [http://www.aafes.com/default_s.aspx]. "We regret any inconvenience this may cause authorized shoppers, but are optimistic that they will understand the sensitivity to the life and death scenarios this product presents as entertainment. As a military command with a retail mission, we serve a very unique customer base that has, or possibly will, witness combat in real life.

"GameStop [http://www.gamestop.com] has agreed out of respect for our past and present men and women in uniform [that] we will not carry Medal of Honor in any of our AAFES-based stores," the company said in an email. "As such, GameStop agreed to have all marketing material pulled by noon today and to stop taking reservations. Customers who enter our AAFES stores and wish to reserve Medal of Honor can and should be directed to the nearest GameStop location off base. GameStop fully supports AAFES in this endeavor and is sensitive to the fact that in multiplayer mode one side will assume the role of Taliban fighter."

Kotaku has printed two interesting responses from members of the military, one supporting the decision and one opposed. A former combat medic who spent six years in the Army, including a deployment to Iraq, said the ban was a "shame" and that he trying to be sensitive [http://kotaku.com/5628960/an-ex+soldiers-take-on-the-militarys-medal-of-honor-decision] to the pain of their patrons."

Medal of Honor comes out on October 12 for the PC, PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360.

Thanks to SmugFrog [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/profiles/view/SmugFrog] for the tip.


Permalink
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
They let them play MW2 don't they? And this has been developed with the help of soldiers.

It's a character skin, you're not "role-playing" like you are in the main campaign. Soldiers have even said before that they have a sort of respect for the Taliban fighters.

Let the soldiers choose what they want to play; and from the sounds of it they've already had people pre-order it ("stopped taking reservations").
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Again, these are GROWN ADULTS who should be able to buy whatever content they think they can handle. Bans seem pointless.
 

Nimbus

Token Irish Guy
Oct 22, 2008
2,162
0
0
Are you telling me that there are Gamestop stores on Military bases? The fuck?
 

Littaly

New member
Jun 26, 2008
1,810
0
0
Meanwhile at EA's marketing department, people lean back, pick their belly buttons and let media do their job...
 

Deofuta

New member
Nov 10, 2009
1,099
0
0
Absolutly ridiculous that they are not allowing soldiers to make their own decision when it comes to purchasing a product. Yeah, you just have to go off base to get it, but come on now.
 

GoGo_Boy

New member
May 12, 2010
218
0
0
Littaly said:
Meanwhile at EA's marketing department, people lean back, pick their belly buttons and let media do their job...
Yep, sitting their thinking: "Mission accomplished." And "Muwhhahahahaa."
 

Outlaw Torn

New member
Dec 24, 2008
715
0
0
I bet the Taliban pull the same stunt in Gamestop stores in their military bases,or caves, or whatever.
 

Evilsanta

New member
Apr 12, 2010
1,933
0
0
Wtf? Really? Its total fiction! Shit as it have been said before why dont anyone react when you play as Nazis? This is just stupid.
 

ZeoAssassin

New member
Sep 16, 2009
388
0
0
So our military have no problem preparing and letting soldiers get shipped out to places like Iraq and Afghanistan to fight in real war, but as soon as a SIMULATED version comes out that can very easily be boycotted by the ones who don't like it and the military feels it needs to treat our troops like children who can't handle a video-game. sounds more like babying our troops then respecting them in my opinion. I call BS on the higher ups making this ban.
 

ultimateownage

This name was cool in 2008.
Feb 11, 2009
5,346
0
41
Seriously, why is the Taliban in a game so bad? You don't seem to be very interested in defending the people you sent to die in Vietnam, or World War 1& 2. Or even the fucking cold war, for that matter. Sure, no one died in it, but it should still be a little questionable making games where you murder Russians.

Get the fuck over it guys, it is just a fucking game. Damn hypocrites.
 

Romidude

New member
Aug 3, 2010
642
0
0
Oh no we can't play as brown people that would just be horrible to kill a few Americans(Models textured to look American), sure we have invaded numerous countries killing thousands upon thousands of people just trying to live their lives and now we can play as the people who opposed that? That's just horrible!
 

Avayu

New member
Apr 15, 2009
345
0
0
Woodsey said:
They let them play MW2 don't they?
That was my first thought, too. MW2 also had levels based in Afghanistan, fighting pseudo-Taliban forces. And in the end of the game you also killed American soldiers, although you were a Brit instead of an Afghani and those Americans were on the wrong side.

So it's okay for soldiers to play a game presenting "life and death scenarios" based loosely on current events as long as they aren't able to play as the enemy forces?
 
Apr 19, 2010
1,544
0
0
Maybe the governments don't want people seeing the war through the enemies' eyes, because you know that might make them seem human and less like malevolent tan people.

Edit: Due to my own personal retardation, I did not realize that you only played the Taliban in multiplayer. Now my mind flashes back to Nazis, terrorists, and Russians.
 

TerribleAssassin

New member
Apr 11, 2010
2,053
0
0
Nimbus said:
Are you telling me that there are Gamestop stores on Military bases? The fuck?
Yarr, I heard the US Army were also part of the Ubisoft DRM bashing that was part of Assassin's Creed II.



OT: Well, I can see why the would, but I can't see the fact that these soldiers, used to combat, Taliban, death and various other things, aren't allowed to make informed desicions on what games to play because of a name that comes up during multiplayer.
 

Vault Citizen

New member
May 8, 2008
1,703
0
0
Its funny, some people who oppose video games say that players won't be able to tell reality from fantasy, yet the only people who seem to be equating playing as the Taliban with actually attacking real life coalition troops are the people who condemn the games.