dammit i wanted to post thatNeronium said:Well unfortunately for the secret service, every time we try to build a sarcasm detector it explodes because of there being too much sarcasm detected.
*sigh*
Remember when the Secret Service tried to be secret about spying on it's citizens. (let's face it, they always have been doing it anyway)
I'm not saying they're worse at detecting sarcasm than everyone else. I'm saying they're worse at detecting sarcasm than British people.Baresark said:Either you are being sarcastic, or you actually think Americans are worse at detecting it than everyone else, which isn't true.TheRightToArmBears said:Given how good American human beings are at detecting sarcasm, I have my reservations about how well an American computer program can.
There's actually some pretty serious science going on for this sort of thing, usually under the heading of "sentiment detection" or "sentiment analysis". Most projects use machine learning techniques like naive Bayes or support vector machine classifiers. The details of that sort of thing are way too long and esoteric to get into here, but basically they take a dataset of known sarcastic text, show it to the algorithm they're using and tell it "These are sarcasm", then let the algorithm infer what features make the text sarcastic. There's a Dutch group [http://repository.ubn.ru.nl//handle/2066/112949] that got a 75% success rate at identifying sarcastic text on Twitter, so there's definitely something to it.Chimpzy said:But seriously, how would they do it? Do they secretly have mind-reading devices or something?
when i read this article i was thinking of the league of legends guy who got sent to prison last year for saying something on facebook i absolutely thought from the tone it was sarcastic but i guess that doesn't always come acrossSleekit said:"sarcasm doesn't work in print" because, simplistically, when we write we hear the words in our mind as if they were being spoken and thus with the "inflection"/"delivery"...but the "inflection"/"delivery" (that would normally socially flag something as being deliberately "sarcastic in tone") is not conveyed through the written words onto the page.
so...they're planning to read our minds ?...
Holy shit, son! I didn't know that shit existed! Shit! I keep learning something new on the internet every single day![footnote]How the hell do you even translate that "Irony Punctuation" into context?! Oh wait... Found it[!][/footnote]!shadowxvii said:There is a punctuation mark used for sarcasm, it's called the Irony punctuation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_punctuation). Now if people would just use it, that'd be perfect.
What, that's amazing!shadowxvii said:There is a punctuation mark used for sarcasm, it's called the Irony punctuation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_punctuation). Now if people would just use it, that'd be perfect.
But what's preventing someone from using the punctuation itself sarcastically?shadowxvii said:There is a punctuation mark used for sarcasm, it's called the Irony punctuation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_punctuation). Now if people would just use it, that'd be perfect.