It is true. The next sentence:gsf1200 said:The writer of the article is pushing his own agenda with remarks like "unfettered access to semi-automatic rifles" which is not true.
Is not only untrue but also doesn't really do anything to rebut the notion that rifle access is unfettered.Rifles were used in about 1% of murders, about the same amount as baseball bats.
Incidentally, homicide is less than 1% of all deaths in America. By the concept of significance, why should we even try and stop it? DUI fatalities are like half that number...Why bother trying to stop people from driving drunk?
We do limit the kind of guns people can get already. Whether we should do more is at issue here. Also, an AK-47 can be purchased in semi-automatic form. I am curious: are you sure you have access to a fully automatic weapon?andy_h007 said:OT: gsf1200, I'm not sure what country you live in. I live in the USA. I know a few places personally that I can get fully automatic weapons without much hassle. That's the problem.
Sure people can kill with a 5 shot semi auto rifle just like they can with a 30 shot AK-47, but why make it that easy for them? Shouldn't we at the very least limit the types of guns people can own in this country (USA)?
You FIEND!Callate said:"...But with the right contributions, some time next year I may find that the biggest threat to this country is maple syrup. That's right, MAPLE SYRUP! Yeah, you heard me, Vermont... I expect to hear some purse strings loosening."
Hmmm...Republicans as bottom feeders. Not quite "Burns as Goa'uld," but close.dtgenshiken7 said:the Republicans are just people that trail along the sidelines picking up snippets of stuff the was popular once and try to use it to make themselves look good.