U.S. Spec Ops Veteran: Modern Warfare 3 Commercial a "New Low"

DalekJaas

New member
Dec 3, 2008
1,028
0
0
I actually really enjoy the trailer as a competitive CoD player because it shows what actually happens as noobs progress to pros. Although the way that noob starts it is unlikely he would ever be better than average.

Sounds like this guy is just having a wah because he saw something he didn't like. It's nothing the industry should take note of.

BonsaiK said:
The Escapist and it's horribly biased news articles, sheesh! If you're going to be cringingly biased in every article you publish here, at least pick the right side.
This ^. The escapist prides itself on high quality journalism but in almost every article the author's put in their own opinion or make it blatantly biased to one side. It does get annoying, especially when you disagree with their view point.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
I agree partially, but overall, war is completely sanitized for the US audience. It's a trivialized affair at this point. And, it's a game, with marketing the markets a game as fun. I think he is taking it way too seriously, just like everyone who compares violent videogames to reality. They at no point said, "War in Afghanistan rocks! You should try it!"

But, each to their own. He is entitled to his opinion and others are ok to agree or disagree with him.

What this does show is a disappointing trend that certain people opinions are more important than others, which is completely false. It doesn't take the voiced opinion of a soldier to come up with this reasoning. But I guess when he says it, it matters more than my girlfriend saying. Which is also completely false.
 

brainslurper

New member
Aug 18, 2009
940
0
0
buy teh haloz said:
[blockquote]The commercial's fun-tastic atmosphere is right for the general experiences you tend to find when playing Modern Warfare 3 online, but EA's complete failure to recognize in the advertising for the game that hundreds of thousands of people actually do this kind of stuff on a daily basis and suffer for it is a valid criticism. [/blockquote]

Surely you mean Activision.

OT: I find it interesting that no Vietnam or Cold War veterans complaining when Black Ops pulled the same "There's a soldier in all of us." ad campaign. I'd imagine something like that would piss off quite a lot of soldiers. I wonder why that wasn't brought up too.
Like that would even be brought up when complaining about a game with nazi zombies. And I'm not complaining, that was the only reason I bought black ops.

It's been a while since Activision has tried to make a legitimate statement about war, and even longer since they tried to create a realistic depiction of it. I doubt that anyone other then the 10 year olds that seem to occupy COD multiplayer would take it seriously, and hopefully they become more mature before they enlist thinking that they know what war is like from COD. Any game that even attempts a realistic depiction of war gets shot down before it is halfway done.
 

Magnicon

New member
Nov 25, 2011
94
0
0
You would think he would be more concerned with criticizing why these wars are being started to begin with, and thus why all those soldiers are dieing/being injured.

A lot more points could be made that show whats wrong with the wars/military actions then a commercial for a video game.

"hideous," "a new low," and "trivializes combat and sanitizes war to an extreme."
Honestly to me this reads like a guy that plans on running for public office at some point. That is just such a ridiculous, over the top way to explain a video game commercial.

Interesting Fact: Did you know that you can sometimes find army recruiters hanging around outside of bars late at night waiting for men to stumble out so they can get them to sign contracts?

Does that sound:
A. More "hideous" and "low" then a game commercial
B. Less "hideous" and "low" then a game commercial
 

Aeonknight

New member
Apr 8, 2011
751
0
0
It was a terrible commercial anyway.

Not because of the subject matter that Grady is discussing, but because it emphasizes the all the terrible gameplay aspects. I wish that whole airplane-flying through the air shooting in slow motion bit was made up just for the advertisement. I really do.

I miss MW1....
 

dyre

New member
Mar 30, 2011
2,178
0
0
Ariseishirou said:
Lol, I love the "maybe it would have been okay before 9/11" part.

All of the soldiers and civilians killed in all prior conflicts? Pshaw. Those don't matter. Make light of those instead. But not his war, that's the one you're not allowed to treat disrespectfully. Bring on those Nazi Zombies, who cares what WWII vets think. That was pre-9/11, when war casualties were hilarious and trivial!
Thought that was hilarious too. Not to mention there are probably dozens, if not hundreds of films that glorify war as some kind of American adventure...at least the CoD commercial does it in a joking way.

Though, I'm more disappointed in the Escapist for reporting (and openly agreeing with) this drivel than in the war vet for complaining about trivial matters.
 

Coldster

New member
Oct 29, 2010
541
0
0
Allergic to Sam Worthington? How can you not like Jake Sully from Avatar? Yeah, that's what I got out of this whole article. One good point was made though; they really should show footage from the game instead of pulling "A Square Enix".
 

Comando96

New member
May 26, 2009
637
0
0
I would have loved that to have been a 2 person interview. Him and someone with basic video game industry knowledge.

Me!

And to when he said "Did no one in the market department raise a hand to-" cut him off and said, "These people are paid to be rude, offensive, controversy grabbing bastards (or nicer word). There are many sides to the industry and the Marketing / PR Department are by far the most damaging to the Video Games external viewers. Prime Example and main offers are EA, followed second by Activision."

The guys who made the ad managed to offended my ex-Sas dad in one simple way.

"They're making war look like a good, fun thing. Bloody Cunts. Last time people though that was in 1914".

And he's an alcoholic... (think insane to the point of genius but mostly insane).

---------------------------

My solution. Force everyone to play Red Orchestra 2 and then walk through a room of dying people crying and screaming on yours and the enemies side. Then instead of respawning at the begining of the level... your dead... thats it, take another soul here... its their turn next...
 

enzilewulf

New member
Jun 19, 2009
2,130
0
0
Just to make a point over Black Ops, you do realize the vets are much older than a lot of the current armed forces returning from conflict correct? Most those vets are grandfathers and probably don't give a rats ass about games in general. I bet if you asked them what CoD is they wouldn't know. Most current service members are in their twenties and no doubt younger. I bet they played the first Modern Warefare game before they even signed up to the Army. MW is a Mainstream game that every one who is 30 and under has no doubt heard of. The reason why no Vietnam vet brought our attention to Black Ops is because they probably didn't know, or even if they did I doubt they played it or even understood what the commercial was about. These are two different age groups we are talking about. One is more in tune with current tech. Giving the argument "Oh well no Vietnam vet complained about Black Ops" isn't valid what so ever. Two different age groups with two different views and understanding on technology.
 

Saucycarpdog

New member
Sep 30, 2009
3,258
0
0
Technicka said:
Why just single out this one commercial? What about GI Joe? Or RED? Or Battlefield 3? Was he pissed at Battle L.A.? Mission Impossible? What about the live action Black Ops commercials?

CoD never claimed to be a honest depiction of war - it's always been a power fantasy for people to run around like they were on a Michael Bay set. .
Activision doesn't help with your arguement though.

http://www.callofdutyendowment.org/

I particularly thought I could do something with Call of Duty since the game in many respects is something we use to honor many of our veterans
From the mouth of Bobby Kotick
 

BarbaricGoose

New member
May 25, 2010
796
0
0
Don't most military shooters (and action movies) trivialize war? Yeah, some try to portray it realistically, but most fail. Even the more serious games like ARMA don't really show what real war is like. It's hard to showcase the horrors of war in a video game, or really any other medium without video taping the actual war. And that would be a boring, and depressing game.

Call me an asshole, but I don't see what the big deal is. It's just a silly commercial. It's not saying "THIS IS HOW WAR IS!" I'm pretty sure it's just meant to be a riff on the mulitplayer element.
 

alandavidson

New member
Jun 21, 2010
961
0
0
SirBryghtside said:
Ugh. It's not depicting real-life events, it's depicting made-up events that are made-up in the made-up portion (multiplayer) of an already made-up videogame.
^This^

No one in their right mind should ever think that real combat is anything like Modern Warfare, or any other shooter for that matter, and anyone who does gets a real wake up call in basic.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
As per usual, tact is dead.

There's a difference between advertising your product and just not giving care about the implications of your ad. See: EA.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Comando96 said:
My solution. Force everyone to play Red Orchestra 2 and then walk through a room of dying people crying and screaming on yours and the enemies side. Then instead of respawning at the begining of the level... your dead... thats it, take another soul here... its their turn next...
Alternately, make them play DEFCON. It's a war game that's the exact opposite of Call of Duty.

And the weeping will haunt you. FOREVER.

<youtube=9lxHjUGxTr4>
 

nsqared

New member
Nov 1, 2011
88
0
0
Hevva said:
"Two smug, A-list clowns strut toward the camera, rifles hanging over their shoulders, explosions consuming the city of New York, and then the words: "THERE'S A SOLDIER IN ALL OF US."," he says. "No, there's not."
Seriously? This guy may be a real soldier, but he acts like my mom when it comes to war games.
People who are not well versed in the tone of Modern Warfare games (or even FPS's) grossly overestimate what it is like. Modern Warfare 3 isn't a war simulator, it's a VIDEO GAME. I don't think everyone who plays MW3 or would buy it would actually want to be a real solider. It's about playing online, not about the blood-and guts of real war. This guy may say that he thinks IRL military personnel will enjoy the game (and even says that he'd like to see the gameplay), but he obviously misses the tone of the game.

TL;DR: Mr. Grady has obviously not played MW3, and therefore does not understand that while we honor people who defend our country and understand how terrible real war is, we still like to trivialize and make silly games out of it.
 

InsomniJack

New member
Dec 4, 2009
335
0
0
I think the real issue here is less about the depiction of casual war and "not showing the game you're advertising" and more about watching Jonah Hill flap his big stupid jowls yet again [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRh4fsQUwWk].

Personally, though, I'm under the impression that this commercial was Activision's way of saying "Yeah, we're not showing the game. We don't have to, because you'll still buy it. We can even pay a ridiculous amount to have two of the most popular stars in our trailer, and STILL break the bank, bitches." This amounted to nothing more than a dare. A challenge from a game publisher who feels untouchable because they're sitting on what's "in" for this generation.
 

algalon

New member
Dec 6, 2010
289
0
0
Saying "Think about 9/11" is like saying "Think about the children". It serves no purpose and does not belong here. Videogames are an escapist hobby (pun intended). We use them to get away from reality. For reality, we have the news. Is dodging a rocket by leaning to the side realistic? Not in the least. Is it fun? You bet! This ad wasn't accurately depicting troops - it was depicting gamers, just like the ads for the last CoD game that featured about 20 B-list celebs. I'll file this under "He just doesn't get it" and move on.
 

Bvenged

New member
Sep 4, 2009
1,203
0
0
That advert doesn't just trivialise War to the extreme, which I agree with, it trivialises the whole human race to the extreme whilst making us gamers look like immature plebs. We all casually chuck around "Noob" but we don't refer to each other as "verterans" in any way. Pro would be a better choice but only the really immature take noob/pro without a cup full of salt.

What's most shocking of all is that this advert sold the game well, which means we have a large proportion of representative consumers giving a less-than appealing image of us gamers to the rest of the world. In my opinion the advert was lame, only appealed to the most immature gamer and represented our favoured industry in one of the worst ways possible.

I'm not going to berate what is the better game, but Battlefield, Uncharted 3 & Halo 3/Reach did their TV spots in exactly the way you would expect. Maturely with live action.

Thus another reason why I severely dislike CoD.