High five.this isnt my name said:I live in Wales havent heaared a thing. However afer reading this.
Supposedly Ubisoft wanted a higher rating. PEGI refused to give the game one because they base their ratings off the actual content of the game not the context or the advertising, hence, the 12+ rating. Still, this was Ubisoft's bad. They should have received the rating before releasing any advertising then they could have dialed it back and the world would have been left with one less embarrassing commercial.RivFader86 said:I really really don't understand Ubisoft's approach...i mean why push for a 12+ rating at all? Who would buy this game? Adults going "meh the game is 12+ rated so it can't be all that daring can it now" ? or actually teens at that age who would want to buy it even more if it was 18+ or so rated (and let's face it we all know that if you want a game/cigarettes/alcohol you aren't allowed to buy yet you can get it anyway)
Still remember how badly i wanted to see "the evil dead" when i was around 15 because it was supposedly this super gory banned (which it actually was in germany for a period of time) movie with a perverted tree.
5) ???Jaime_Wolf said:1) Ubisoft made an admittedly stupid commercial.
2) Parents predictably overreacted. This was as much their fault for not being informed as it was Ubisoft's for making such a misleading commercial.
3) I doubt most gamers are going to be running off to the store to grab this on release day anyway.
4) OH GOD NOT SEX, ANYTHING BUT SEX.
Exactly. I mean it looks like a bad game, would've sucked and then would've been forgotten (and the idea would be dismissed in the future). As such, this advertisement just stirs things up...it was actually pretty successful.RatRace123 said:If Ubisoft didn't run that stupid ad, none of this would've happened.
The game would've come out, bombed and faded from memory within a month.