Honestly the first time i can ever remember a (mainstream) game being pulled over here. Plus it wasn't banned. Just pulled by the publisher.Mcface said:Lol ain't it great how Europeans think Americans are all up tight about sex?
Then go about banning everything?
The problem with your analogy is that the poeple expressing views on the escapist are the hardcore metal fans and the Daily Mail and Sky News watchers/readers are the viewers of American Idol. Just because most people posting here agree with you doesn't mean that those views are the majority view in the real world.SenseOfTumour said:I'd suggest it's not sensible as a company to listen to the ignorant and unfounded opinions of people who aren't going to be your customers. That'd be like Simon Cowell cancelling American Idol because he heard metal fans consider it an offence to the music industry.direkiller said:or the vocal minority in this caseFightThePower said:You need to learn that the majority are not always right.albino boo said:Yes I entirely agree they should stop listing to the opinions vast majority of poeple who live in the country and those with power to change the law ban the sales of unpopular video games. Its clearly smart decision to ignore public opinion in any democracy after all, politicians don't read newspapers and take polls on what those pesky voters think.FightThePower said:The videogame industry really has to grow out of this habit of folding to any kind of political/media pressure.
No they should carry on, release it anyway, enjoy all the free publicity the Daily Mail and Sky News gives it, and revel in it selling to idiots, who don't seem to realise you can play the same game with a vodka bottle, with the advantage that emptying it beforehand makes people far more likely to join in the pervy stuff.
Game - £40
Bottle of Smirnoff - £10
I know where I'd go for my inspiration for a slightly pervy game of 'Dare'
Isn't that something we should be slapping Ubisoft for, not PEGI? The vocal minority wasn't able to put pressure on Ubisoft because PEGI did it's job badly. It was able to do that because Ubisoft doesn't have the balls to go against a vocal minority. That's their problem and shortcoming, let's not scapegoat PEGI because they were in the middle just doing their jobs.Andy Chalk said:It's not whether or not PEGI accurately rated the game that counts, it's the reaction to the rating that's at issue. At least on the surface of it, an ignorant but vocal minority was able to pressure Ubisoft into canning a game because the rating was "wrong" - which is to say that it disagreed with the assigned rating, despite having no factual basis for doing so, and that ultimately carried the day. Kneejerks reacted, Ubisoft caved, but it's PEGI that is ultimately undermined.Vrach said:But PEGI rates CONTENT and saying that game has content that's 18+ would simply be inaccurate.
Thats the daily mail the suns just shit.Simalacrum said:English equivalent of Fox News... but meh, I don't think anyone will really miss the game
In rape play's defense oh wait it's such a bad game i formatted my hard drive twice after playing it for 3 minutes. That aside I don't think this was marketed towards children it's just a party game with dirty words, which kids will look up in the dictionary or text books anyways. I am all for the ban not because of the content but because it's just another horrible wii party game that never needs to see the light of day.Phoenixlight said:Good, marketing a "sexy" game to children is just fucking ridiculous, how about marketing Rape-play to them next?...