Strazdas said:
BiH-Kira said:
Gee, it's like I traveled back in time few months before the WiiU release.
Are Ubisoft's and EA's opinions relevant, at all, when talking about Nintendo? They jumped the ship before the ship was even in the planing process. All they do is talk how it's unique and good and how they want to see what other developer will do with it. I can't be the only one who noticed they always talk about other developer and never what they will do with it.
Well Ubisoft and EA at least tried releasing their games on WiiU for a while until eventually got fed up with nintendos shit and gave up. So yes, thier opinions are relevant, at least as relevant as any other third party developer.
I'm sorry, but delaying a
finished exclusive game for over half a year after the supposed date only to release it at the same time on other consoles and PC, releasing a buggy survival horror that has literally one single attack animation while you're supposed to kill almost everything in your way and releasing a buggy port of the last part of a trilogy without any of the DLC for the full price while literally a week earlier releasing the whole trilogy with every DLC for cheaper on another console does not count as "trying". Unless you mean that they tried to sabotage their own games on the WiiU just to have a excuse to drop the console. Then yes, they tried their hardest because you can't fuck so much shit up by accident.
Every single game they released was:
1. buggy as fuck
2. looked worse than on the Xbox 360 which is weaker
3. was more expensive
4. lacked DLC
5. was released months later because "the WiiU was not on the priority list" - developer that "tried"
Yeah, they "tried".