erttheking said:
Yeah, see, I don't consider fifteen hours to be fast in any regard. Particularly if they're fifteen hours of you getting your ass kicked because you have nothing and everyone else has bullshit gear.
you know there are game modes where gear doesn't appear right
i play them all the time.
duels and i think brawls step out of it by default, and i think that duels and brawls are the heart of the game, for honour is more of a fighting game then anything else.
15 hours is pretty fine for me though, i mean i've played about that much in raider (i'm not x spamming i swear) and it's not something i am surprised about.
It's a fighting game, It's going to take me about that much time to get good combos down (i am shit forgive me) in others.
You talk about how you were able to 1v4 people...and yet you still insist that the game isn't broken I really have no way to respond to that.
I do, skill and conditions around your class should allow you to in theory, that's why revenge mode fills up faster when you are surrounded. It doesn't mean 1v4 is common. It's not. I think i've seen one kensi in all my 30 hours do it but then he was rather skilled and honestly lucky.
because one on one with warden i was able to kill him by blindsiding him.
people effectively become harder to fight when you gang up on them because id they can block good they get revenge, whigh is why unless under time restraint i advocate for a tain BO style one v one system, or a good throw
You talk about how they could have won if they had fought smarter, but to be frank, you chances of winning should've been utterly 0%.
that's dumb.
It's a fighting game, being able to outsmart the enemy.
In mobas people can team v 1 and win, the entire point of daruis and yi if am not mistaken.
In rts games you can do the same, i've done it RA 2, hardest AI, second highest speed, it was a hard fight.
In FPS's i've out fought large groups
in killing floor ive seen people clutch.
it's something rare but not impossible.
even then, you will end up with skilled players on your team because that's the only time you see gear come into play, on teams.
Don't act surprised that people are pissed by this play to win bullshit.
I am more annoyed for the aesthetics i want to pick up the flaming wings so i can dues my vult when i go crusading (or more accurately get some odin lighting because knights are a meme, vikings dah best).
you are over blowing this nons.
Not everyone has enough time or patience to pour a hundred hours into a game to learn how to master it, because apparently that's what you have to do to get around this unbalanced crap.
the first duels i had *(and while i don't have as much as the other fellow did) taught me the importance of timing. I can be pretty confident that just knowing your character gives you a better position then someone with good gear. even when i didn't with say warden i was still able to kill the aforementioned kensi by timing my attacks right. all gear does is increase damage regen or block, which dies necessitate that some folks will be able to attack and attack and attack and hit harder but they need to hit. I love the game because of it, it's can be more cerebral if you let be and i've never found a game that allowed me to begin building schema so early on.
I'm glad you enjoy it, but the rest of us are pissed,
you speak for no one but yourself.
Not me, not my friends who play the game and nobody else.
furthermore given that you've said you don't own the game i don't believe you can even try to speak for people who do at all.
and we're not pissed for no good reason. Plenty of us who looked at this game just wanted a nice melee combat simulator, only to get turned off by all off the stupid bullshit Ubisoft crammed down our throats.
I got my melee combat simulator.
I can still play it without gear and without stupid bullshit, so i don't know what you are on about or how you are foaming at the mouth so much about this.
Look i'm going to reason something out.
If you don't own the game you must have either returned it or didn't pick it up.
if you returned it you've had to have had less than 2 hours played. which means all of this information would have had to still been gleamed after the fact because it seems clear that you would not have purchased it if you had known that.
[/quote]
Battenberg said:
Oh, Ubisoft. I look forward to seeing this mentioned at the end of the next Jimquisition.
first time i've seen look forward and jimquisition in the same sentence.
the guy doesn't even look forward to himself in the mirror, the imax sized one it takes to show that much poor eating habits.
