I think the first article is the very definition of 'over-thinking it'. No-one who watches the show is going to be profiling the character's race or sexuality. The people who made the show probably did not have race or sexuality in mind. It's pure and simple entertainment, and very well written and funny entertainment at that.Geo Da Sponge said:I assume it all started with this article: http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2010/12/09/my-little-homophobic-racist-smarts-shaming-pony/Loop Stricken said:Well it's better than assuming she's a lesbian and ramming the 'fact' down everypony's throat.NinjaDeathSlap said:Sorry, I'll edit that. I did genuinely think She was a guy (though now I realise that makes no sense in context), probably the last remnants of my masculinity desperately clinging on there.
... okay, weird mental picture.
Which was followed by this response: http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2010/12/24/my-little-non-homophobic-non-racist-non-smart-shaming-pony-a-rebuttal/
What's really ridiculous about the article is that the writer uses circular logic to argue that the show is homophobic, and makes herself look like the very thing she's arguing against. Her 'logic' is this: Rainbow Dash is a tomboy, tomboys are stereotypically lesbians, therefore Rainbow Dash is a lesbian, therefore the show is perpetuating stereotypes. What. The. Fuck.
Edit: If I had to knit pick I'd say that there was one area of the show where they did stereotype unfairly, in that Appledash (is that her name? It was quite late last night when I watched it) might as well be called "Hillbilly Pony", head-butts trees, and lives with her entire extended family of about 100 people (or ponies). I imagine some people could find that distasteful.