Ha! No, seriously, go to the religion & politics boards and make a thread claiming that Atheism is the same thing as being anti-religion. Just do it. Come back with what little of your limbs you have left and tell me what happened.The_root_of_all_evil said:Because atheism is an anti-religion.
They're not campaigning for or against anyone's rights! They're campaigning for an accurate census! Admittedly, they only have a vested interest in it because they feel their demographic (the non-religious) is being underrepresented, and probably wouldn't give to shits if it was Christians being marginalized, but that doesn't make their message suddenly not honest and useful. The leading nature of the question and the flippant attitude of the public is creating a misrepresentation of the facts in an area where a glance at the data could decide how hundreds of thousands of tax dollars are appropriated. This should be addressed by the government anyway, but this organization isn't being dishonest or unjust to anyone by doing it themselves. Quite the opposite.The_root_of_all_evil said:They're not campaigning for the public rights, they're campaigning against religious rights.
I don't know what you mean by "which figurehead you get to stand behind." Who is the "you" here, first of all?The_root_of_all_evil said:It's not like the polls have any more function than voting, other than which figurehead you get to stand behind.
But actually, I think the voting comparison may have some worth. What if thousands of people wrote in "Optimus Prime" for a high ranking government office next voting season? Some people do it to be funny, some because they want to "stick it to the man," but at the end of the day, public opinion has been wasted. And what if an unpopular politician is elected due to the loss of those thousands of votes? Is it worth the message mongering and "lulz" to be governed by someone you disagree with or don't trust?