I will play double for you!poncho14 said:I have prelims on Monday, so it is on the one weekend I will probably not be on. Now I feel bad:|
I'm so racking up like 12 hours minimum this weekend!
I will play double for you!poncho14 said:I have prelims on Monday, so it is on the one weekend I will probably not be on. Now I feel bad:|
Exactly.Destal said:I'm in agreement with you on this one Funk, I think that they are doing quite a good thing to donate money, regardless of how much it is. The best part is that all you have to do is something that almost everyone that participates was going to do anyway.CantFaketheFunk said:Really?The_root_of_all_evil said:Blatant PR stunt is blatant. It may be good money, but it's a sleazy way of donating it.
Seriously, "Let's get teens to play war criminals, so we can give money to victims of war criminals".
Vile.
Really?
Yeah, getting adult gamers to play one of the most popular games of all time - certainly the most popular of the season - to try and set an Xbox Live record all while giving money to help children in wartorn nations is truly the most vile and shameful thing I've ever seen.
I can't believe you even wrote that. If your reaction to donating money to a charity to help victims of warfare is to knee-jerk call it "Vile," I think you seriously need to reevaluate your stance on things.
But if I play a great game online this weekend, I won't be playing Modern Warfare 2 ...CantFaketheFunk said:So there you go. Play a great game online this weekend, and a company donates money to an extremely worthy cause. Sounds good to me.
MULTIPLAYERBaron Khaine said:Sorry Funk, but a game that has you gunning down civilians, giving money to gunned down civilians, doesn't sit well with me at all.
Good on them and all that, but its just a publicity stunt, I mean what percentage of the Modern Warfare profits is 250k? Tiny.
Agree with Root, its exactly the same as musicians with failing careers who attach themselves to a conflict to try to gain support (i.e. Bob Geldof), not stating Activision are failing, far from it, just saying what it feels like to me.
Wonder what those insaine collector sets with the NVG went for over there.Spygon said:Dont try to make yourself look good Activision in the eyes of the uk gamers just because your price failed.Due to help from the retailers causing a price implosion in the uk for mw2 on launch day.
Apologies, I was unaware that Activision didn't produce the singleplayer for MW2.dogstile said:MULTIPLAYERBaron Khaine said:Sorry Funk, but a game that has you gunning down civilians, giving money to gunned down civilians, doesn't sit well with me at all.
Good on them and all that, but its just a publicity stunt, I mean what percentage of the Modern Warfare profits is 250k? Tiny.
Agree with Root, its exactly the same as musicians with failing careers who attach themselves to a conflict to try to gain support (i.e. Bob Geldof), not stating Activision are failing, far from it, just saying what it feels like to me.
the part that has SOLDIERS fighting SOLDIERS.
this has nothing to do with single player
Oh its cool, i'm just forgetting the fact that this is a game where there are no civilians in the multiplayer portion of the game, and that you don't have to play the single player to get to the multiplayer.Baron Khaine said:Apologies, I was unaware that Activision didn't produce the singleplayer for MW2.dogstile said:MULTIPLAYERBaron Khaine said:Sorry Funk, but a game that has you gunning down civilians, giving money to gunned down civilians, doesn't sit well with me at all.
Good on them and all that, but its just a publicity stunt, I mean what percentage of the Modern Warfare profits is 250k? Tiny.
Agree with Root, its exactly the same as musicians with failing careers who attach themselves to a conflict to try to gain support (i.e. Bob Geldof), not stating Activision are failing, far from it, just saying what it feels like to me.
the part that has SOLDIERS fighting SOLDIERS.
this has nothing to do with single player
Nor was I aware that in conflicts of soldiers v soldiers, civilians don't get caught in the middle.
Guess what, if the money was actually going to help people in war torn countries, then I wouldn't be cynical. But everyone with a brain knows that out of any and all money we pump into any war torn country, a percentage will end up in the hands of the ones doing the hurting. So here's what I say, stop all charity, let em all fucking kill each other, have done with it, and the world will be far better off.dogstile said:Oh its cool, i'm just forgetting the fact that this is a game where there are no civilians in the multiplayer portion of the game, and that you don't have to play the single player to get to the multiplayer.Baron Khaine said:Apologies, I was unaware that Activision didn't produce the singleplayer for MW2.dogstile said:MULTIPLAYERBaron Khaine said:Sorry Funk, but a game that has you gunning down civilians, giving money to gunned down civilians, doesn't sit well with me at all.
Good on them and all that, but its just a publicity stunt, I mean what percentage of the Modern Warfare profits is 250k? Tiny.
Agree with Root, its exactly the same as musicians with failing careers who attach themselves to a conflict to try to gain support (i.e. Bob Geldof), not stating Activision are failing, far from it, just saying what it feels like to me.
the part that has SOLDIERS fighting SOLDIERS.
this has nothing to do with single player
Nor was I aware that in conflicts of soldiers v soldiers, civilians don't get caught in the middle.
Is being cynical about everything working out for you, because you seem to hate EVERYTHING.
I agree with you Funk. I really don't understand why people are so cynical about this.CantFaketheFunk said:Really?The_root_of_all_evil said:Blatant PR stunt is blatant. It may be good money, but it's a sleazy way of donating it.
Seriously, "Let's get teens to play war criminals, so we can give money to victims of war criminals".
Vile.
Really?
Yeah, getting adult gamers to play one of the most popular games of all time - certainly the most popular of the season - to try and set an Xbox Live record all while giving money to help children in wartorn nations is truly the most vile and shameful thing I've ever seen.
I can't believe you even wrote that. If your reaction to donating money to a charity to help victims of warfare is to knee-jerk call it "Vile," I think you seriously need to reevaluate your stance on things.
I don't care about who little it is or how much is going to who, i care about the fact that you seemed to think that the multiplayer involved shooting civilians, or you had to shoot civilians, or something along those lines, which was stupid in its own right.Baron Khaine said:Guess what, if the money was actually going to help people in war torn countries, then I wouldn't be cynical. But everyone with a brain knows that out of any and all money we pump into any war torn country, a percentage will end up in the hands of the ones doing the hurting. So here's what I say, stop all charity, let em all fucking kill each other, have done with it, and the world will be far better off.dogstile said:Oh its cool, i'm just forgetting the fact that this is a game where there are no civilians in the multiplayer portion of the game, and that you don't have to play the single player to get to the multiplayer.Baron Khaine said:Apologies, I was unaware that Activision didn't produce the singleplayer for MW2.dogstile said:MULTIPLAYERBaron Khaine said:Sorry Funk, but a game that has you gunning down civilians, giving money to gunned down civilians, doesn't sit well with me at all.
Good on them and all that, but its just a publicity stunt, I mean what percentage of the Modern Warfare profits is 250k? Tiny.
Agree with Root, its exactly the same as musicians with failing careers who attach themselves to a conflict to try to gain support (i.e. Bob Geldof), not stating Activision are failing, far from it, just saying what it feels like to me.
the part that has SOLDIERS fighting SOLDIERS.
this has nothing to do with single player
Nor was I aware that in conflicts of soldiers v soldiers, civilians don't get caught in the middle.
Is being cynical about everything working out for you, because you seem to hate EVERYTHING.
250k isn't even a fucking drop in the ocean. Unless someone can actually help these people, I mean literally end all the shootings, deaths, wars, whatever, then what is the point? All your doing is funding more hate.
Obvious oversimplification troll is obviously oversimplifying. Get back under your bridge.Baron Khaine said:Guess what, if the money was actually going to help people in war torn countries, then I wouldn't be cynical. But everyone with a brain knows that out of any and all money we pump into any war torn country, a percentage will end up in the hands of the ones doing the hurting. So here's what I say, stop all charity, let em all fucking kill each other, have done with it, and the world will be far better off.dogstile said:Oh its cool, i'm just forgetting the fact that this is a game where there are no civilians in the multiplayer portion of the game, and that you don't have to play the single player to get to the multiplayer.Baron Khaine said:Apologies, I was unaware that Activision didn't produce the singleplayer for MW2.dogstile said:MULTIPLAYERBaron Khaine said:Sorry Funk, but a game that has you gunning down civilians, giving money to gunned down civilians, doesn't sit well with me at all.
Good on them and all that, but its just a publicity stunt, I mean what percentage of the Modern Warfare profits is 250k? Tiny.
Agree with Root, its exactly the same as musicians with failing careers who attach themselves to a conflict to try to gain support (i.e. Bob Geldof), not stating Activision are failing, far from it, just saying what it feels like to me.
the part that has SOLDIERS fighting SOLDIERS.
this has nothing to do with single player
Nor was I aware that in conflicts of soldiers v soldiers, civilians don't get caught in the middle.
Is being cynical about everything working out for you, because you seem to hate EVERYTHING.
250k isn't even a fucking drop in the ocean. Unless someone can actually help these people, I mean literally end all the shootings, deaths, wars, whatever, then what is the point? All your doing is funding more hate.
I never once stated that Multiplayer had you shooting civilians. Not once.dogstile said:I don't care about who little it is or how much is going to who, i care about the fact that you seemed to think that the multiplayer involved shooting civilians, or you had to shoot civilians, or something along those lines, which was stupid in its own right.Baron Khaine said:Snip