UK Retailers Accused of Blacklisting Steam-Required PC Games

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,847
0
0
Okay, good one stores. Now people are just going to go to Steam and give them all your money, and now you don't get any of that sale. Genius.
 

Xan Krieger

Completely insane
Feb 11, 2009
2,918
0
0
I believe Steam should be optional, never mandatory. Steam functions like an anoying DRM, I remember buying Half Life years ago and yet I couldn't install it with the disc because I needed to register it on Steam. It wasn't till years later when I got internet access that I could finally play a game I bought.

I support any game retailer that doesn't want to sell games with that horrific DRM.
 

sunburst

Media Snob
Mar 19, 2010
666
0
0
MelasZepheos said:
I really sympathise with these guys. The way digital disribution is going, Valve have basically set up a monopoly, and will, in the same way as Microsoft and Apple did, probably be very very hard to dislodge now.

What I see Valve as having done is very sneakily gone behind everyone's backs, and very under the table, and set up Steam before the advent of digital distribution, and I think in the coming years we are going to see their company practices get very ugly as theystruggle to maintain their vice-grip on the industry.

But yeah, Valve are teh aw3som3s, greatest videogame developers, they made half life and thus everyone must worship the ground they walk on. Anything I say will just be ignored and get me attacked by the legions of Valve fanboys, when they're not being bent over the table by the ep 3 release date.
I've heard of damning with faint praise but this is praising with faint damnation. Valve went under the table by offering a service nobody else did. Then they "bent [their fans] over the table" by not yet releasing the concluding episode to a game series everyone loves. They suck at being evil.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Well, if these tantrums spread to Canada, I'll have EVEN LESS use of game retailers (considering they only stock maybe six or seven different games at a time anyways).
 

draythefingerless

New member
Jul 10, 2010
539
0
0
RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:
And the world keeps spinning.

I hate that we require web connection for most games(but to be fair i mostly play MMOs, online co-op, and online RTS so my point could be strange) but i don't want to get a new RPG, take it home and find out i need to wait 10 hours on a download because i need STEAM or worse ORIGINs.(origin is worse because i would need to download that after making space on my PC)

Worse is since it runs through STEAM i have a 50-50 shot at NOT getting to play in offline status because for some god awful reason i need to be online. I like that i CAN connect my games to the steam cloud and have them download ready, hold the repeated code inputs. I don't like having to play them through STEAM. Sometimes i want to play my games and not be bothered by STEAM friends.

I realize some people are going to go defend valve but point is we should not need the register the game online, punch in a key code, download the game(when we own the fucking disk), and then install it because someone is afraid of piracy. And for the record pirated games cut through that yellow tape so if i get sick enough of the DRM policies and what not for a game i bought i will torrent the game and lay it free of STEAM, origins, and all the DRM forced in my face.
rather the best argue agaisnt steam ive heard. most people just shout it as an abomination,it should be purged and we should just use physical copies forever, when really, its the future of society to integrate evth possible thru online communication. that being said, games run in offline mode in steam, so your point of the RPG is a lie. there are cases where steam freaks out and doenst let you, but thats the exception glitch, not the norm. even then, you are right on some point. games bought on steam or with steam should allow for individual execution, without the need for the program to turn on. that is my one complaint of steam. that it is always mandatory to be running, even when it is pointless.
 

artanis_neravar

New member
Apr 18, 2011
2,560
0
0
Bobzer77 said:
therandombear said:
Err...last time I checked the PC game shelves in my local gamestop and other electonic stores, there's Fallout: New Vegas and several other game titles with steamworks logo...damnit, forgetting titles..atleast I know it says steamworks on most of them, I've checked.

So, this only in the UK then or happening other places?
You have shelves dedicated to PC games in your shops?

Now there is just a spot for WoW right next to the 360 shit in my local gamestop.

Might not buy so many games through digital distribution if the retailers actually sold any...
There's like a two game wide 5 game tall section of the wall "devoted" to PC games at gamestops in my area, but that's it. I've been hitting up Amazon for my games lately, you preorder them and get 10-20$ Amazon Credit
 

samsonguy920

New member
Mar 24, 2009
2,921
0
0
Abandon4093 said:
In all fairness. If you're going to buy a game that requires steam, why not just buy it from steam?
Because some people do like solid merchandise, and even though I like getting my games with less hassle digitally, I can understand that. But taking those games off their shelves is only hurting the retailers, as that is lost sales to them. The game producers lose a lot less in the increased profit share they get with digital sales. When you don't have to count part of that price tag to compensation for burning discs and printing out boxart, it adds up to a lot of saved change.
(Why do you think Steam is so crazy with sales all the time?)
I get why they've done this, they've probably had complaints that certain games make them download steam, and if they're anything like most of my friends. They don't want it or care what it is, they just don't want to have to install a secondary program to play it.
I shouldn't have to install that shit Games for Windows Live on my system to play a game, and yet I don't hear the retailers complaining about that. Need I remind people that GFWL has its own digital store as well. Steam is the best digital system right now, though that can always change. And though you may have to install it to run the game, you don't have to keep it online in order to be able to run the game without having your disc in the drive.
From what I hear of the UK Retailer Game, this doesn't surprise me that they would be this stupid. This move will only hurt their own sales while trying to make a point that is entirely pointless. Do you hear GameStop complain about Steam? No. GameStop instead is rolling up their sleeves and getting into the digital marketplace themselves. There's competition and then there are petty whiners who don't want to do anything to change with the times. The internet is here people, with its big brother broadband. Having a solid disc and box is nice, but there are times when you just don't want to be bothered to go into the city and deal with long lines just to get a game. Or wait for the postal service or UPS to deliver it.

It's a brave new world. You can either adapt to it and make your own footstep, or just go away. Game is doing the latter, it would seem.
 

ZombieGenesis

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,909
0
0
Since when did UK games stores carry PC titles anyway?

I've been to GAME, Gamestation, HMV and Game City retailers in Dorset, Hampshire, London and Cornwall respectively. Other than London (which actually did have a list of new pc releases) the best they had was a concealed corner display with some marked down 1990-ish titles and a few shelves of WoW: Cataclysm on the bestsellers.

If this is the next move of brick stores, then PC games are about to vanish from real world shops, and they put in the final nail themselves.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Xan Krieger said:
I believe Steam should be optional, never mandatory. Steam functions like an anoying DRM, I remember buying Half Life years ago and yet I couldn't install it with the disc because I needed to register it on Steam. It wasn't till years later when I got internet access that I could finally play a game I bought.

I support any game retailer that doesn't want to sell games with that horrific DRM.
Indeed. Though I kind of like steam, I agree that it should always be optional. Unreal Tournament 3 did this, and I loved that it did this. You could install it normally, or you could activate the product key on Steam and install it that way.

I wish more games did that.
 

Kiefer13

Wizzard
Jul 31, 2008
1,548
0
0
Bah. I never buy games from brick-and-mortar games shops any more anyway. The vast majority of my purchases nowadays are through Steam, or if I feel like having a boxed copy, Amazon.

It's no wonder physical games retailers are stooping to tactics like this really. They're becoming increasingly irrelevant.
 

Jabberwock xeno

New member
Oct 30, 2009
2,461
0
0
On one hand, these stores are being jerks.

On the other, you shouldn't ever HAVE to have steam for a game you buy that was not purchased on steam.
 

Xan Krieger

Completely insane
Feb 11, 2009
2,918
0
0
Irridium said:
Xan Krieger said:
I believe Steam should be optional, never mandatory. Steam functions like an anoying DRM, I remember buying Half Life years ago and yet I couldn't install it with the disc because I needed to register it on Steam. It wasn't till years later when I got internet access that I could finally play a game I bought.

I support any game retailer that doesn't want to sell games with that horrific DRM.
Indeed. Though I kind of like steam, I agree that it should always be optional. Unreal Tournament 3 did this, and I loved that it did this. You could install it normally, or you could activate the product key on Steam and install it that way.

I wish more games did that.
2 things
1. You brought up UT3 because of my username, didn't you?
2. I actually have 15 games on steam, one of which I bought through steam.
 

KirbyKrackle

New member
Apr 25, 2011
119
0
0
MelasZepheos said:
I really sympathise with these guys. The way digital disribution is going, Valve have basically set up a monopoly, and will, in the same way as Microsoft and Apple did, probably be very very hard to dislodge now.

What I see Valve as having done is very sneakily gone behind everyone's backs, and very under the table, and set up Steam before the advent of digital distribution, and I think in the coming years we are going to see their company practices get very ugly as theystruggle to maintain their vice-grip on the industry.

But yeah, Valve are teh aw3som3s, greatest videogame developers, they made half life and thus everyone must worship the ground they walk on. Anything I say will just be ignored and get me attacked by the legions of Valve fanboys, when they're not being bent over the table by the ep 3 release date.
I share your concern about a potential monopoly that could result in Valve deciding to drop good business practice because there's no competition to keep them on their toes, but how exactly have they "very sneakily gone behind everyone's backs, and very under the table" in setting up Steam? Was there an official announcement for "today is the day that digital distribution exists and is a thing" that they were supposed to wait for before introducing it?
 

Xannieros

New member
Jul 29, 2008
291
0
0
Abandon4093 said:
In all fairness. If you're going to buy a game that requires steam, why not just buy it from steam?

I get why they've done this, they've probably had complaints that certain games make them download steam, and if they're anything like most of my friends. They don't want it or care what it is, they just don't want to have to install a secondary program to play it.
Some people don't care/use/know steam, games like The First Templar and Dawn of War 2 require you to install it to play. Even if you have a physical copy. Even if you wanna try out The Orange Box but don't have steam you HAVE to install it.

Though I don't see why they are blacklisting games... seems like a dumb move IMO. I mean Modern Warfare 2 required steam, what if Modern Warfare 3 did as well? That's a ton of lost profit.
 

iniudan

New member
Apr 27, 2011
538
0
0
BrailleOperatic said:
Why is a Russian magazine reporting on this, and not, say, a British one?
1C is the biggest Russian video game developer/publisher not a magazine publisher. =p