Ukraine

Ag3ma

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2023
2,517
2,182
118
So...does everyone in the US army have to sit through a 3 hour powerpoint presentation about not giving top secret information to net randoms?
To be fair, it is almost inevitable that some people vulnerable to this sort of manipulation are going to end up with access to secret information. As the saying goes about throwing enough shit at the wall, keep testing and you'll eventually find one. Just think - with the development of AI agencies won't even have to waste their own time on it. Just send a bunch of bots to butter up enemy officers. In fact, we can all look forward to the point where 20% of the Earth's entire electricity consumption is AI bots trying to chat each other up on the internet.

But someone who surely must have been trained - I find the idea that they're handing it over based on nothing but lines of text.... I mean, at least be suckered by someone who has to turn up and meet you in person.
 

Gordon_4

The Big Engine
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
6,101
5,395
118
Australia
Also the guy was a recently hired civilian that only at an earlier stage of his life was in the army, not sure how much of that training he got.
Any organisation that handles classified material tends to drum this kind of learning into all its people's heads on a very regular basis. Regardless of clearance level, regardless of position in the hierarchy, regardless of actual job. Everyone does this shit.

Why a recently hired civilian can get those documents in the first place is more of a question.
Its not uncommon for people to leave a government body - in this case the Department of Defence - and then be hired back as a civilian contractor as soon as the obligatory waiting period has expired. Especially if its a role that doesn't strictly need an active duty military member to do it. And if he left the service in good standing with a still active clearance......
 

Hades

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2013
1,988
1,461
118
Country
The Netherlands
Currently there's a terrorist attack in Moscow. It should be noted Putin started his reign by bombing his own civilians so he could start a war in order to prop up his image as a though guy. I wouldn't discount this attack being yet another crime of the Kremlin against their own population.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cicada 5

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
11,112
5,833
118
Country
United Kingdom
Islamic State has posted videos claiming responsibility for the mass shooting at the concert hall outside Moscow, at which 133 have died and over a dozen more are critically injured. They also included videos of their own gunmen filming themselves during the incident.


Russian state media had sought to blame Ukraine. Even now, after the above videos have been released, Russian media avoids mention of Islamic State and continues to point to Ukraine.
 

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
11,112
5,833
118
Country
United Kingdom
Russian foreign ministry is doubling down, disputing that Islamic State is responsible for the Crocus City massacre and again accusing Ukraine. Their spokesperson today wrote an article to that effect in Komsomolskaya Pravda.

This is despite the fact IS released images of the gunmen before the attack, and also released bodycam footage from their men during the attack itself.
 

Hades

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2013
1,988
1,461
118
Country
The Netherlands
Russian foreign ministry is doubling down, disputing that Islamic State is responsible for the Crocus City massacre and again accusing Ukraine. Their spokesperson today wrote an article to that effect in Komsomolskaya Pravda.

This is despite the fact IS released images of the gunmen before the attack, and also released bodycam footage from their men during the attack itself.
So essentially we can take away from the Kremlin's response that against all odds they weren't behind the attack but seem to regret that, and now act as if they were behind the attack.
 

Ag3ma

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2023
2,517
2,182
118
So essentially we can take away from the Kremlin's response that against all odds they weren't behind the attack but seem to regret that, and now act as if they were behind the attack.
I think Russia's line on this is that ISIS carried this out, but with the backing of Ukraine, USA and UK. (Because after all, ISIS gets on with the USA so well.) The argument of the Russian government roughly is that ISIS doesn't have the capability to get some gunmen into a Russian entertainment venue, so it could only do so with the support of more powerful players.