Same here. I mean I think he does well in some roles (Departed), but he is not the Nathan Drake type, not in the slightest.Swarley said:I lost interest as soon as I heard Mark Wahlberg was starring in it.
Suuurrreee that's what you mean ;3FargoDog said:Yeah, you haven't had time for a lot of things have you? Like our sex life!Julianking93 said:Hey, fuck you, I haven't had time to watch it yet! >>
*hides copy of the Departed in DVD stack*
..Wait, fuck no! I mean Ghost in the Shell review. Yeah, that. <.<
So wait the guy from FireFly got replaced by that dude from The Happening, really?AjimboB said:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Well, I don't know what I expected, I mean, I knew this movie would be shit when they didn't cast Nathan Fillion, so this is just one more reason not to go see this.
As well you should be!FargoDog said:Nah, I'm good. I'm totally satisfied with our sex life.
AND WHAT DO YOU MEAN ANOTHER REVIEW THAT ISN'T GHOST IN THE SHELL?! I had mine up a week ago!
You mean Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull right?AjimboB said:According to the OP, when they mean "family movie" they meant that they would be focusing on Drake's extended family, not that the movie would be one that would appeal to family audiences (although I would guess they're trying for that as well). The only Indiana Jones movie that ever did that was the one which shall not be named, and we don't need another one of those.
That movie gave me a fobia of rollerskates from which I never quite recovered.Julianking93 said:Very much so.FargoDog said:Is it ironic that the one film he was good in okay (to appease Matt, especially good in) was technically about sucking?
It also happens to be the film I'm talking about as well![]()