Oh, I nearly forgot, bacon is horrible. It tastes bad and it's horrible for you. I don't understand putting bacon on everything.
I am not placing judgement on the value of a panda's life. What I am saying is that pandas as a species are poorly suited to survival, and are entirely dependent on human intervention to live.Silvanus said:What "use" is any creature, including humans? Usually, living is considered an end in itself, not least by humans.Asclepion said:Pandas are a useless animal and should be allowed to go extinct.
A better analogy would be if you sat down in front of a steamroller, and every time the townsfolk moved you away from it you went back and sat in the same place.Aelinsaar said:I'm sorry, but that's like saying that if you wrap a rope around my neck and start to strangle me, I've evolved poorly to cope with the rigors of life without you NOT killing me.
This is close to what I feel as well. You do not choose to be born into this world, but you can choose to leave it, and you should be allowed to do so if you so desire regardless of reason. Many tend to label it as a selfish act, without realizing that keeping someone in this world against their will just because you want to is just as selfish if not even more so.Kevlar Eater said:I don't think suicide is a cowardly act, and I prefer to disregard the opinions of those that call it such. People with severe mental disorders, terminally ill people, people with no positive future despite having no disorder or illness, I believe, should consider suicide. Which is more expensive: a crematorial funeral, or the afflicted to continue being a burden to family and society because these people are incapable of recovering or smartening up?
In any case, I think those that commit suicide (preferably by their own choice as opposed to coerced into it) should be lauded as heroes, as they effectively step aside for more useful, productive people to step in and advance humanity.
Don't get me wrong - if someone mowed down every dolphin in the world with a machine gun, the loss would be a terrible tragedy. Whales, Giant Tortoises, etc are all wonderful, and evolution is no justification for callous behavior towards the other beings that we share the world with.Aelinsaar said:OK, but we're still the ones who brought he steamroller to the party. Unless you want to argue that after millions of years the panda suddenly became unsuited to its environment, and not that the environment is changing... and I'd like to hear that argument to be honest.
I find it funny that this is considered an unpopular opinion now.Azure23 said:- I think FF7 holds up in terms of gameplay and narrative and I find it's Lego character models charming.
Eugenics would be based on genetics, genocide is typically of a particular ethnic group, but yeah, I think it applies here; I can't come up with another appropriate term for the mass slaughter of a designated undesirable group.Kevlar Eater said:This is starting to sound like a case of eugenics or genocide, but unless these people show a genuine desire to work and/or attain higher education (so they become people of higher value), they should be killed.
tl;dr: if the slackers cannot or will not serve in life, their deaths and organs can serve others.
This dude is talking about becoming Hitler 2.0 and you guys are arguing about pandas... ya'll mothers need priorities.Aelinsaar said:OK, but we're still the ones who brought he steamroller to the party. Unless you want to argue that after millions of years the panda suddenly became unsuited to its environment, and not that the environment is changing... and I'd like to hear that argument to be honest.Asclepion said:A better analogy would be if you sat down in front of a steamroller, and every time the townsfolk moved you away from it you went back and sat in the same place.Aelinsaar said:I'm sorry, but that's like saying that if you wrap a rope around my neck and start to strangle me, I've evolved poorly to cope with the rigors of life without you NOT killing me.
@Rattja: At best, death is a mystery we all have to face... why the rush?
Depends on which definition one is using for "Liberal" on this one. If it's the European one, then yes this is fairly true. If it's the New World Commonwealth one (Canada, Australia, New Zealand) less so. If it's the American one, not really.Azure23 said:- Reality has a liberal bias.
Whoooaaaa shots fired. More Handsome Jack for me, then~ObsidianJones said:-Fuck Handsome Jack.
He took my loot based shoot-'em up and filled it with the same type of self absorbed inanity that I hate on the internet. The Borderlands universe just became a stage for "What's Handsome Jack going to do next?!".
- On the same token, fuck people's general attitudes now.
The "If you don't agree with me, you're stupid and wrong" mindset that everyone seems to have now isn't brilliant, it isn't revolutionary, you're not a trailblazer since you're absolutely following a well-worn trail that almost 80% of the net population follows now.
People can have different opinions, and you can address them. That's great. That's discourse. But to de-evolve into insults and rage doesn't fix anything. It doesn't open minds. It creates divides and we get no where in a conversation. It takes no effort to stay as a moody 12 year old kid who only knows curses and dismissal as ways of 'communicating'. It takes stronger people to be ready to be proven wrong or find new ways of thinking.
I think the acting is awful on top of all that. Harrison Ford in particular.AccursedTheory said:Star Wars has aged poorly, and the thing that really props it up is its excellent cast. It has a terrible story, and 8 year olds can come up with more consistent, convincing, and deep lore.