jamail77 said:
I think people can agree on the core imagery of a utopia at least, if not how it's organized.
And therein lies the problem. Sure, we can agree that peace, acceptance, and happiness are great and would be an intrinsic part of a utopia, but no one has the slightest clue how to bring that about, and once you start to go into details, cracks start forming. Without specifics, all you have are a bunch of nice sounding but ultimately meaningless buzzwords. [/quote]
jamail77 said:
I'd argue we're a lot better about ideologies coexisting than we were the generation before and the generation before that and so on.
Who's we? We, meaning western culture? The world at large? The internet? No, not really. Sure, there is more acceptance of certain previously persecuted ways of thinking and minorities, but in turn other problems just rise up to replace them. There have been plenty of cultures in ancient times that were far more open minded and accepting than we ever will be, and they had problems that we find appalling. Humanity is essentially running in place, constantly evolving but never really progressing, at least not as a whole. In time, the problems we solve will come around the gamut, with new prejudices replacing old ones. Why? Because it's not a hivemind. It's made up of individuals, each with their own set of strengths, flaws, prejudices, and virtues.
jamail77 said:
Another one of my unpopular opinions is that there are individuals who can achieve something that, for all intents and purposes (since true perfection is by definition impossible), any of us would consider perfect. Someone who has never lied, never given into temptation, someone with a perfectly balanced life, someone who fully realized their inner potential. Heck, maybe someone who has managed perfection in all those areas rather than just one. It bothers us because we think it destroys multiple narratives we have culturally constructed. It makes us feel inadequate or that there is a limit to how far we can go or whatever. In reality, I think it opens a lot of doors for us to recognize this is possible. A utopia does seem possible to me.
Sure, certain individuals are capable of reaching "enlightenment," (whatever that means) and/or a state of...well, not perfection, but the closest a person is able to anyway. But a whole society, one that has millions of individuals being born into every day? It's...not going to happen.
Though I should note that despite my pessimistic tone, I actually love humanity, flaws and all. I prefer to look at people's strengths and triumphs while trying to understand their flaws instead of condemning them, because most of the time I am no better. However, so long as evil exists, utopia is impossible. And so long as humanity has the option to be evil, evil will exist. And so long as free thinking exists, people will remain divided. But as removing free thinking and the possibility to be evil will also take away a huge part of what it means to be human, then I'd rather society remain imperfect.