Update: BioWare Teases Release Date for Next Mass Effect

Recommended Videos

redmoretrout

New member
Oct 27, 2011
293
0
0
I'll try to keep an open mind but I haven't been impressed with a Bioware game since the 1st Dragon Age. They have been releasing mediocre games for a while now. I was amazed by the outrage caused by the ending of Mass Effect 3 not because I thought the ending was good, but because I thought the plot was weak for the entire trilogy.
 

Zeckt

New member
Nov 10, 2010
1,085
0
0
I got the impression they don't want to make mass effect games anymore judging by how the trilogy ends. So is this a sick joke? and no, I won't look at their save face ending. They wanted to end their trilogy that way, thats the way it is with me. They wanted to kill their own franchise, and now they want to make a new game?

No matter what they do, I will never get starchild out of my head for the fact that that is the way they wanted it to be in the first place. ME is dead, shot by their own creators. If I could I would kick it while its down for being the biggest entertainment dissapointment in my life. It was THAT BAD that it was not only a dissapointment it simply disgusted me. I hate Mass Effect and I almost hate bioware for MAKING ME hate them.
 

Murmillos

Silly Deerthing
Feb 13, 2011
359
0
0
When it comes out doesn't really matter. Because, well, Day-One orders between myself and EA are long done.
 

BloodRed Pixel

New member
Jul 16, 2009
630
0
0
Did actually ANYBODY see that ending in the midnight park where the 'child' asks 'grandparent' for 'one more story' and the 'grandparent' sais 'ok, one more story'? Anybody?

Or was I the only one on the internet getting that hint?

The ME3 story - following indoctrination theory - is far from finished, for me.
So hopefully they make ME4 the actual ending or Bioware can stuff it where the sun don't shine.
 

Beautiful End

New member
Feb 15, 2011
1,755
0
0
B-but I want Dragon Age 3!

I couldn't get into ME at all but I love DA. So far. ME has the upper hand with 3 titles already out there and a 4th one in the work. DA, on the other hand, only has two titles, and the second one wasn't that great from what I hear (Barely started it).
Yeah, I know I'm just complaining about something unrelated right now but...is it just me or does it seem like they're releasing more information about this new ME game than DA3?
Not fair. :[
 

Lovely Mixture

New member
Jul 12, 2011
1,474
0
0
BloodRed Pixel said:
Did actually ANYBODY see that ending in the midnight park where the 'child' asks 'grandparent' for 'one more story' and the 'grandparent' sais 'ok, one more story'? Anybody?

Or was I the only one on the internet getting that hint?
I think it's cause everyone would rather not remember the less desire-able aspects of ME3.
 

DrunkOnEstus

In the name of Harman...
May 11, 2012
1,712
0
0
I played KotOR for the first time recently (I know, I'm upset with myself too). I was astounded when I discovered that Casey Hudson played a major role in that game. Anyone who's played KotOR knows exactly what I mean.
 

Dendio

New member
Mar 24, 2010
701
0
0
I for one can't wait till the next installment in the series comes out. Love the mass effect universe
 

crazyrabbits

New member
Jul 10, 2012
472
0
0
Product Placement said:
Evil Alpaca said:
Unless Bioware wants to declare one ending canon...
You can't make a Mass Effect sequel that takes place after the third game, regardless which ending you pick. In all possible outcomes, the entire Mass Relay network was destroyed. It's not the same world anymore. What used to take hours/days of travel now takes decades or centuries.
Well, as others said, the EC did retcon the endings so that the relays were clearly shown to be merely damaged instead of outright destroyed (as the fanbase largely assumed after the original endings).

All that said, though, I'm going to go out and say it will be impossible to make an ME4 given the current circumstances. I still fail to understand why (given that this is a franchise that had - emphasis on that word -the potential to be a persistent franchise) the writers backed themselves into a corner. As I've said before (and as others have rightly pointed out), there's little prequel material to draw from - all of the major conflicts were either way too short (the First Contact War - two weeks) or way too long (the Rachni Wars, which stretched on for decades).

If they're going to create a sequel, they have to answer the following (potentially universe-changing) variables:

- Is Shepard alive or dead? (less of a concern if it's far in the future)
- Are the Reapers alive or destroyed?
- Is the game following the original ending (relays destroyed, everyone screwed) or EC ending (relays merely damaged, everyone goes home)
- What squadmates are still alive? (all of them can potentially be dead by the final battle if the EMS is enough to ensure a "good ending" but result in their deaths)
- Is the galaxy still unchanged or half-synthetic?
- Did the Reapers leave voluntarily (as a result of ghost!Shepard) or are they still helping the Synthesized galaxy?

I honestly don't know how any of these variables can be reconciled unless the entire ending is retconned. The fact that the development team (as noted in a recent Game Informer article) honestly didn't know there would be a problem with it until the game was released shows that they didn't think any of this through at all.
 

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,186
0
0
Nihlus2 said:
Giving Dragon Age 3 an isolated chance, that's the last for me, I know the studio responsible for Mass Effect has some great writing talent, like Patrick Weekes and John Dombrow, those two wrote a lot of your favorites like Garrus, Wrex, Legion, Mordin, Thane and a lot more. They also were responsible for Tuchanka/Genophage Arc and Rannoch/Geth and Quarian Arc (they were not the only ones, but they wrote the main parts and storyline for these parts).

To me those two were the saving grace of Mass Effect 3, but I cannot condone what they are being forced to work with so... I'll watch them, but have no faith in the people making the decisions at that studio anymore.

Dragon Age 3 though has one final shot, especially since the studio of Dragon Age actually did admit, that Dragon Age 2 was a flawed and rushed game. Still found it alright myself, not replayable, but still more compelling than ME3 as an isolated game (although the Tuchanka and Rannoch Arcs were the best in recent years from Bioware).
And for all its flaws, it did have some redeeming elements, it was like a failed Mass Effect 2 fantasy game, but it was also an isolated story, which makes it a bit manageable to recover from.

Oh well, with that said, let's wait and see what they bring to the table to show.
You have summed up my opinion almost to the letter.

To be honest with Mass Effect, I feel the franchise has been too ruined for me, too many issues with the lore and writing now, so I am only hoping that Dragon Age 3 might be able to show me that people leading Bioware games are still capable of making decent decisions.