[UPDATE] Feds Take Down Megaupload

Recommended Videos

Solo-Wing

Wanna have a bad time?
Dec 15, 2010
3,641
0
0
Well shit. Anonymous attack back in revenge strike for Megaupload. http://gizmodo.com/5877679/anonymous-kills-department-of-justice-site-in-megaupload-revenge-strike

[HEADING=1]EDIT: DO NOT CLICK THE LINK TO THE NEW MEGAUPLOAD!!!! IT IS AN ANON TRAP! THEY WILL DDoS YOU![/HEADING]
 

Doom-Slayer

Ooooh...I has custom title.
Jul 18, 2009
630
0
0
Grey Day for Elcia said:
Irridium said:
Snip for space
I'd like to know the stats just out of curiosity.

Pure conjecture on my part, but I can't see how legal users could even begin to approach pirates on sites like MU, RS, BT, MF, etc. Never seen any solid numbers though, so who knows?

No, really--who knows? I want to ask them :p
Stats like that would be impossible to find. Because as far as they are concerned theres no pirated content on being hosted that they know of. Since they delete whatever they are told about. And Id have to say 90% of the pirated stuff would all be obscure stuff hotlinked to blogs. And unless you know about the blog, youll never even know the file is there.
 

Little2Raph

New member
Aug 27, 2011
112
0
0
Makes me wonder - if the FBI spent as much time and effort in tracking terrorists as they did in tracking internet pirates maybe 9/11 wouldn't have happened. . .

What I also find hilarious is the fact that in retaliation Anonymous shut down the websites for the FBI, US Justice Department, Universal Music, and the Recording Industry Association of America.

They're trying to police the internet and they can't even protect themselves. . .
 

Sakeretsu

New member
Aug 15, 2010
37
0
0
How greedy can some people get .

Megaupload provided a great service for legal filesharing ,and yes it supported quite a lot of copyrighted materials ,because most of us can't afford the prices that they put on the amount of cultural products we consume ,there is a reason why Russia and China are mostly based entirely upon pirating .

I'm have seriously had enough with those money grubbing lobbyists. They have been doing steady increasing profits forever !

Sign me up for the war for Internet my comrades ;taking down porn ...that's just gone too far !!
 

NerfedFalcon

Level i Flare!
Mar 23, 2011
8,131
2,050
118
Gender
Male
bringer of illumination said:
LAND OF THE FREE!

HOME OF THE BRAVE!!!


Aren't you just so proud of your country Americans?
I think this version is more appropriate:


(Note: I actually like Jason's later work, such as in Black Knight, more than Roger's. I also thought he did a good job with Shadow, but... everyone else there is just terrible. And I'm pretty sure half of them aren't even pseudo-American. So it's even more appropriate, actually.)
 

Sylveria

New member
Nov 15, 2009
1,285
0
0
Little2Raph said:
Makes me wonder - if the FBI spent as much time and effort in tracking terrorists as they did in tracking internet pirates maybe 9/11 wouldn't have happened. . .

What I also find hilarious is the fact that in retaliation Anonymous shut down the websites for the FBI, US Justice Department, Universal Music, and the Recording Industry Association of America.

They're trying to police the internet and they can't even protect themselves. . .
There's no big corporate lobbyists paying them to investigate real threats though.
 

wintercoat

New member
Nov 26, 2011
1,691
0
0
Taking down a file sharing site used by millions to stop a handful of pirates is like firebombing a country to kill a few terrorists...oh wait, this is just par for the course for the U.S. government, carry on.
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,776
0
0
Awexsome said:
Tay051173096 said:
Awexsome said:
Haha! Yes! Finally some god damn consequences against those who actually deserve it in this whole piracy thing. Stop going after freaking google and youtube and go after sites like this!
Your joking right? If they can set precedent laws with this youtube could well be next with all the anime and music content on there...
No slippery slope bullshit that was actually a threat with SOPA. This is a single takedown of a single site giving blatant disregard for piracy laws and, with this new revelation, was actually encouraging it and giving out benefits to their users for doing it.

There is a distinct difference between MegaUpload's objective and Youtube's. Youtube actually gives a fuck about enforcing piracy laws. Megaupload encouraged breaking it.
And all the music and music videos and clips from shows on youtube aren't a blatant disregard of these same laws?

And they give so many fucks they don't take most of the videos infringing on copyright down. Not to mention youtube hosts Lets Plays. Which show copyrighted material. And youtube is making ad revenue off all of this. Using the same terms, how is that any different?
 

Me55enger

New member
Dec 16, 2008
1,095
0
0
While reading this, there has just been a news broadcast from BBC radio 2 on this topic.

Just a theory: perhaps the Yanks werwe sitting on this information and waiting to make th emove should SOPA lose support, so to remind reople that it is, of course, a necessity.

Total bullshit, of course. Just a theory.
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,776
0
0
SenseOfTumour said:
Exactly. The internet store front scares the shit out of them. You only have to look as far as Valve/Steam to see it works. They've made an entire fleet of golden yachts full of cash, worth of money.

But like you said, they don't want money. They want the control. They can't control online storefronts, meanwhile they can control what is released in a brick and mortar store. That shelf space costs money, and stores want to carry what people will for sure buy. Meanwhile digital space costs next to nothing.

So anybody can put anything up for sale. Bands might start to think, 'Why do I need a record label?' when they can put stuff online for sale themselves for dirt cheap. So instead of adapting or finding a way to co-exist, which is the financially intelligent decision, they're going to fight. The entertainment industry has chosen the path of most resistance and are intent on killing the internet, or they're going to damn die trying.

And the government is more than willing to please them, because who funds these campaigns?

On another note, what scares me most about SOPA is probably the utter lack of media attention. I've yet to see it on any news source on TV. Or on the radio. Because the media is all part of these huge conglomerates, which are the ones pushing SOPA. So they don't want to inform people of it. The media is no longer the watchdog of the government. And that's frightening.
 

chaostheory

New member
May 14, 2008
73
0
0
Does anyone else feel that people are overreacting to the copyright charges when they are quite minor compared to the money laundering charges? Honestly the copyright charges feel like a throw in with the money laundering charges, like something to get rid of for plea deals, not the other way around. Also taking down the offending business is pretty much standard operating procedure for money laundering cases.

I'm pretty sure that if the department of justice responds to the outrage they will just tell everyone that the site was taken down for money laundering not for copyright infringement.
 

madster11

New member
Aug 17, 2010
476
0
0
Hold on a second.

Did they just fuck with our Porn?
Because i'm pretty sure they just did.

If anyone needs me, i'll just be over here in this air sealed, 1km underground bunker.


Inb4 massive lawsuits brought against the US Government for damages from people all over the world.
I might start them, considering i used the site to backup some files to go with my physical backups, which got deleted when my USB stick failed. They were drafts of my book.
If it sold 1mil copies and i got 10% of each sale, that's roughly $2000000usd in damages.
I'll expect the money in my account by the end of next week, thanks.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,405
0
0
"racketeering conspiracy, conspiring to commit copyright infringement, conspiring to commit money laundering and two substantive counts of criminal copyright infringement."
wait what? racketeering? were they beating up music producers to give them illegal copies? money laundering? how exactly? i call bull. reminds me when stormtroppers in US just randomly confiscate servers because someone though it could have copyright material. turns out it didn't, but they didn't return the servers anyway. so pretty much they stole the servers.
 

MattAn24

Pulse l'Cie
Jul 16, 2009
656
0
0
Am I the only one who fucking LOVES that this happened? Good riddance. We need less of these illegal upload sites. If you've got video to upload, WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUTUBE THERE FOR?
 

Exterminas

New member
Sep 22, 2009
1,130
0
0
Why does the fact that somebody from the music buisness is behind the site suprise anyone?

Granted, my first bet would have been one of the big names from the porn industry.

But these people aren't stupid. They know that their money is running through the drain of piracy. And while they all just love banging on how much they want the Feds to ban piracy, they know it isn't going to happen anytime soon.

So the more sensible thing is to simply chip in yourself and host the sites that make a profit of "stealing" your own products. That way you can even sue your own customers for "pirating" your stuff.