http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/117546-UPDATE-Final-Fantasy-Versus-XIII-Becomes-FF15
didn't we just have this same discussion last month?
didn't we just have this same discussion last month?
The surprising thing to me is that some people immediately believed it was true. The odds of this being true are just as slim, if you ask me.Halfstache said:http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/117546-UPDATE-Final-Fantasy-Versus-XIII-Becomes-FF15
didn't we just have this same discussion last month?
I have no idea, I read something somewhere about a XIII-3 and I just don't see the point.kurupt87 said:I kind of got the impression that Nomura with Versus was like Peter Molyneux with, well, anything. Except, he wasn't promising it to us he was promising it to himself, chasing rainbows so to speak.SkarKrow said:Because the two sequels to the one that was shit will be easier to produce and sell. Rather than Nomura's 6 year old vaporware.kurupt87 said:Why kill the one that looked good and make two sequels to the one that was shit? The mind boggles.
Honestly I cared about Versus 13 a few years ago and was excited for it.
But oh well maybe now we can have a good FF game rather than 13 dragging it's half dead carcass about for even longer.
I don't understand why after the critical failure of 13 they didn't switch focus to versus and get that out rather than try and resurrect 13. Why would I buy a sequel to a bad game?
Sigh, it did look good. I just mean the atmosphere/tone of the thing.
And about 13, haven't they only just announced/rumoured that second sequel?
I certainly hope you aren't saying Type-0 is a sequel to XIII, because it isn't. And, Type-0 was actually very, very good.kurupt87 said:Why kill the one that looked good and make two sequels to the one that was shit? The mind boggles.
No, he's referencing FF XIII-2 and XIII-3 which is due to be announced.ZiggyE said:I certainly hope you aren't saying Type-0 is a sequel to XIII, because it isn't. And, Type-0 was actually very, very good.kurupt87 said:Why kill the one that looked good and make two sequels to the one that was shit? The mind boggles.
FUCK KINGDOM HEARTS 3!!! THERE I SAID IT! I'm sorry, man It's just that this was shaping up to be such a good game, the one thing that would reaffirm my belief and trust in Square-what ever the last word is now. The first good and original idea Square has had since Final Fantasy X, (DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT BRINGING UP XIII) and all everyone keeps going on about is "Kingdom Hearts 3!" it's not even that good, sure the first one was, but the rest just made the narrative boring, unoriginal and convoluted. Final Fantasy Versus XIII had everything going for it, just...........damn it. Ok I've said my piece, and i guess i still have the Shin Megami Tensei games to keep me a JRPG fan. Good-bye Final Fantasy, you were awesome while you lasted.lancar said:So...
Does this mean that Tetsuya Nomura will finally start working on Kingdom Hearts 3? Y'know.. that title that everyone and their dog have been asking for for 7 (!) years? The one even Disney themselves wants?
No?
sigh...
Seriously, all we've seen of vs13 are the standard pre-rendered trailers squeenix churns out instead of good games these days, so they can talk premise and vision all they want and I still wouldn't give a toss about it dying.
Really? I read on Wikipedia that 9 was developed alongside 8.bluegate said:Originally, the Final Fantasy X we know was to be the ninth installment in the series, however, a side project caught the eye of some guy within square-enix and that was promoted to be Final Fantasy 9, the original FF9 turning into FF10.dragongit said:Final Fantsy 9? What was that almost?
This isn't really that detailed an explanation but it's the gist of it. For a more accurate explanation you should hit Wikipedia or some FF fan-site.
That is what I remember reading somewhere anyway, if anything I say is wrong, feel free to set me straight.