if you go for RAID, then you need to apply the same for the SSD(s).Laughing Man said:http://s878.beta.photobucket.com/user/laughingman09/media/Image2-1_zps8b5c1f75.jpg.htmlThere is a problem somewhere. It's impossible for a mechanical drive to be faster than an SSD.
I beg to differ, blue line is a pair of mechanical Samsung F3s in Raid 0, red line is a single Vertex 3.0. The Samsungs are clearly faster. Okay I've had to Raid the drives but it is in fact possible for mechanical drives to be faster than an SSD.
As for the Piston, if this in fact the fore runner to Steams own 'console' then it looks like that MS exec was right when he said that Valve proved to be no threat in the console market.
Marketing doesn't make something so. The Xbox is very purely a game console. The focus on porting is a positive trait, but it doesn't make it a PC.Austin Manning said:When the original Xbox first came out, that's what Microsoft was pitching it as, a then-modern gaming PC that could be plugged into your television. It's one of the reasons why so many PC/Mac titles (Halo, Morrowind) ended up on the Xbox.
A lot of people don't want to put in the effort to learn how to mod a PC, or what to look for in a good PC. They just want to buy a thing and play games on it.Austin Manning said:It still strikes me as pointless though, as someone could buy a cheap PC, mod it and plug it into the TV. Or they could just buy a super gaming rig and plug that into their TV. The only way I could see a console/PC hybrid being made simpler (without stripping out modularity and becoming a console) is to redesign the internal components so that they can be easily swapped out for newer version (similar to a gaming cartridge).
That's fair. I'm sure this system is great for some people. I'm just not sure how big the "I want a portable PC, but not a laptop, and I don't mind lugging around a keyboard and mouse" market is.mateushac said:Well, the idea of gaming on a laptop doesn't appeal very much to me (I hate the position of the keyboard relative to the screen)so I can definitely see what a portable desktop has to offer. Being able to bring my gaming along when visiting my family would be heaven!
Also, a keyboard and a mouse will easily fit a backpack or a suitcase, so it doesn't look like that much of a problem to me.
Sure, the market for it is VERY niche, but my original comment was specifically about the pricing, which is pretty fair when compared to a laptop (and allowing for a little bit of overpricing due to the whole market pioneering thing)ClockworkUniverse said:That's fair. I'm sure this system is great for some people. I'm just not sure how big the "I want a portable PC, but not a laptop, and I don't mind lugging around a keyboard and mouse" market is.mateushac said:Well, the idea of gaming on a laptop doesn't appeal very much to me (I hate the position of the keyboard relative to the screen)so I can definitely see what a portable desktop has to offer. Being able to bring my gaming along when visiting my family would be heaven!
Also, a keyboard and a mouse will easily fit a backpack or a suitcase, so it doesn't look like that much of a problem to me.
I need mechanical hard drive. I have 5 terabytes of storage, it's nearly full.Steven Bogos said:I'm not calling you a liar but I find this very hard to believe. Overwhelming evidence supports SSD's being considerably faster than mechanical drives. Even the best mechanical drive caps out at 120 MB/S while modest SSD's are around 300 MB/s. That's a huge difference. There is most likely some kind of fault somewhere in your system. There is no way your windows is loading faster on a mechanical drive than an SSDMrPeanut said:Funny, I got an SSD, timed it in comparison to my mechanical drive.Steven Bogos said:The tradeoff is that SSD's are MUCH faster and much less likely to fail. The update to SSD is probably one of the best upgrades people can make. You only really need the drive that you have windows and your games on to be an SSD, mechanical drives are fine for files. I made the switch to SSD last year and I'll never look back. Windows loads in about 15 seconds and my games load in moments, making 'level loads' almost a thing of the past. It also speeds up your overall performance.Evil Smurf said:I'm actually a fan of mechanical hard drives. The're cheaper and have larger storage. Like terabytes large.
Games are all the same, windows actually loads faster from a mechanical drive.
And I can assure you it was not a faulty drive![]()
this isn't the valve steam box, the author is being very misleading to make the story more interesting, this is a form factor PC that's going to be utilizing the steam format, now does that just mean the big screen function or the whole kit i doesn't say.jebbo said:Doesn't this kind of defeat the point of the accessible, cheap Steambox? I thought the whole ethos of the Steambox was to create something affordable that could compete with a console price point. By effectively being at least twice the price of what we can probably expect a PS4 to be for the lowest entry model then they've just shot themselves in the foot.
Alienware is a poor comparson choicemateushac said:I don't understand what everyone had been expecting. This is a pretty impressive rig for its size (granted we don't know its GPU yet). Alienware's M14x [http://www.dell.com/us/p/alienware-m14x-r2/pd.aspx] sells for $999 and the poor thing comes with a pitiful 6GB of RAM, a GT650M (not amazing by any stretch of imagination) and a mechanical hard drive. If I were to choose between the two, I'd probably go with the piston.
Probably the best point in favor of this thing. It's crazy portable. I could see a few people getting a lot of use out of something so smallThe Plunk said:It may be pricey, but it's also the SIZE OF A GODDAMN GRAPEFRUIT.
This is probably the most portable gaming machine outside of handhelds and smartphones. Probably a lot more powerful too. If the specs are as good (or better) than a high-end gaming laptop, I can see this being well worth the money for people that travel a lot.
Yes it is. Mind you, some game developer allowed pre-orders on an unrevealed game recently, so go figure.mdqp said:You can pre-order it now... And yet not all of the specifications have been revealed? Isn't that a bit odd?
Exactly. The smaller you make a PC, the more expensive it gets.The Plunk said:It may be pricey, but it's also the SIZE OF A GODDAMN GRAPEFRUIT.
You were seriously expecting it to be smaller AND cheaper? Engineering isn't magic...Crazie_Guy said:Okay, so it's going to be about as expensive as a normal computer of the same specs. Erm... what was the point of this again?
They are also far more reliable than solid state drives. I'd take reliability, low cost, and more storage over an (marginal) improvement of data transfer speed any day.Evil Smurf said:I'm actually a fan of mechanical hard drives. The're cheaper and have larger storage. Like terabytes large.
I think in this case it is the size of the object.Ironman126 said:They are also far more reliable than solid state drives. I'd take reliability, low cost, and more storage over an (marginal) improvement of data transfer speed any day.Evil Smurf said:I'm actually a fan of mechanical hard drives. The're cheaper and have larger storage. Like terabytes large.
Actually that the opposite, an SSD is more reliable since it got no mechanical part, SSD tend to die very early or at their maximum write durability, HD just tend to fail randomly. So basically just put an SSD into test reliability for a week or two to check if can be integrated. With HD there no point beyond a double pass check, has anything beyond a bad unit is just random.Ironman126 said:They are also far more reliable than solid state drives. I'd take reliability, low cost, and more storage over an (marginal) improvement of data transfer speed any day.Evil Smurf said:I'm actually a fan of mechanical hard drives. The're cheaper and have larger storage. Like terabytes large.