Upgradeable Consoles.

Recommended Videos

Hateren47

New member
Aug 16, 2010
578
0
0
NickCaligo42 said:
The point of a console is to keep hardware standards consistent across developers. It keeps console development easy, allowing devs to optimize for one specific level of detail instead of dozens of variations in-between. They're able to depend on one specific polygon count being the magic number they have to shoot for with any particular asset, give or take. They're able to depend on a specific resolution for textures being the maximum resolution.

You're proposing to not do that.
The point of a console is to make money by letting people have access to a reliable source of gaming. I think developers would like this as they can release a better looking game. They would have to make the game look good and work at the minimum configuration but it wouldn't be hard for them to let games scales like a PC game (handled by the OS and not the user). After all they are releasing the game for PC on the same date anyway.
 

Hateren47

New member
Aug 16, 2010
578
0
0
Maraveno said:
TheComedown said:
snipped for comfort

This is insanely wrong, unless your talking about big bucks for hardware that is completely unnecessary and wont be taken advantage of for at least another year. There are 4 or 5 year old PCs still working fine and are only just now beginning to show their age.
Actually you're wrong I've been going behind the bush for quite some time now and if you want to keep playing the newest games You'll have to continuosly upgrade if you want to play them in the same proper quality I'm not stupid My brother bought a new laptop last year and allready now he can't max out a fair number of games anymore whilst The xbox is still showing improved quality in visuals now even though it's much older

My point being : My brother bought a grand gaming notebook
Not everyone has the money for that so consoles are the solution that should not be tampered with
If you upgraded you computer with a 8800 GTX in 2006 instead of buying a 360 your games would still look at least the same or better than the same game for 360 or PS3. I would say it was time for an upgrade, personally, but it would still play well.
 

Continuity

New member
May 20, 2010
2,050
0
0
The point of a console is that it is a uniform platform for developers, plus the gamer knows that if the game is compatible with his console then it will run as it should without any upgrades.
If you start making consoles upgradable then they just become special application PC's in a particular form factor - something the developers don't want for many reasons.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
GuideBot said:
Irridium said:
Well if you could do that then why not just by a PC?
Incredibly, upgradeability is but one of many features distinguishing PC gaming from console gaming.

Personally, I really value that all consoles of a given type are more or less identical, at least in terms of performance. For example, when playing online, I feel much better knowing that everyone has almost the same hardware, at least as far as the actual processing power and video output goes (though, of course, they may have better/worse screens, audio equipment and so on - still, close as it can get). I think it makes for a far more level playing field.

I also like how games will just run on consoles. You seldom need to worry about crashes, performance issues or hardware worries. I wouldn't like to change that.
How does exact hardware make for a level playing field? Last time I checked, the most important thing when it comes to online play is your connection rather than your hardware so you can never have a "level" playing field.

In regards to your comments about crashes and performance issues. Games seldom crash on PC. In fact, I can't even remember the last time a game crashed. Ironically, when I was playing Red Dead Redemption on my 360 it suddenly froze and I had to restart the console in order to remedy the situation. I can say without a doubt this has not happened on my PC unless I was using something that could hinder the stability of a game (Like mods or trainers).

In regards to performance. You're right, you don't have to worry about games running but if you bothered to buy some hardware neither would you on the PC. Nowadays, you DON'T have to spend thousands of dollars to get a decent gaming PC. My own PC is average when it comes to gaming but I've had no problem running new major releases on High. StarCraft 2, Modern Warfare 2, Splinter Cell: Conviction, Mass Effect 2, BioShock 2, Battlefield: Bad Company 2(Though this one was horribly optimized.), Dragon Age etc. So, whilst this is a decent argument you can achieve the same results using your PC quite cheaply if you ask me.

In regards to hardware. You DO have to worry about hardware. Depending on how long a console generation lasts you WILL end up having to upgrade your console(aka hardware). Not only that but you have to worry about hardware crashing. The Red Ring of Death and the Yellow Light of Death are both realities when it comes to console gaming whilst I'll have no problem with my hardware as long as I take the time to dust it now and then.


OT: Like Irridium said, you're better off just getting enough money for a gaming PC.
 

Continuity

New member
May 20, 2010
2,050
0
0
Maraveno said:
My point being : My brother bought a grand gaming notebook
There was his mistake right there... "gaming" or no, notebooks are not an ideal gaming platform and you will always pay much more and get much less.
 

Hateren47

New member
Aug 16, 2010
578
0
0
Can any one post a link to where a well known game studio says they would rather develop for consoles because it's easier, and not because of piracy or because their publisher pays them to? I didn't know what to google...
 

Hateren47

New member
Aug 16, 2010
578
0
0
Maraveno said:
Hateren47 said:
Maraveno said:
TheComedown said:
snipped for comfort

This is insanely wrong, unless your talking about big bucks for hardware that is completely unnecessary and wont be taken advantage of for at least another year. There are 4 or 5 year old PCs still working fine and are only just now beginning to show their age.
Actually you're wrong I've been going behind the bush for quite some time now and if you want to keep playing the newest games You'll have to continuosly upgrade if you want to play them in the same proper quality I'm not stupid My brother bought a new laptop last year and allready now he can't max out a fair number of games anymore whilst The xbox is still showing improved quality in visuals now even though it's much older

My point being : My brother bought a grand gaming notebook
Not everyone has the money for that so consoles are the solution that should not be tampered with
If you upgraded you computer with a 8800 GTX in 2006 instead of buying a 360 your games would still look at least the same or better than the same game for 360 or PS3. I would say it was time for an upgrade, personally, but it would still play well.
You seem to miss the big point first off a good pc at least is the price of 3 xbox's
then a proper update for that pc (a full one) equals an xbox in price and a graphics update is half an xbox in price , round here anyways

Not everybody has that much money to spare for gaming
Maybe 2 360's if you don't include a monitor (you didn't include the price of your TV). You won't need the newest from Intel and Nvidia for gaming. These companies makes awesome processors that does a lot of awesome stuff awesomely. But for gaming AMD can cut your price in half and you would only lose 5-10% performance and PhysX. You buy a "good" PC and then you upgrade it as newer hardware comes within a reasonable price range.

Edit:
I can get a 3GHz Phenom II X4 945 and a XFX Radeon HD 5670 (sure its not the fastest out there) for the price of a Xbox 360 S (250 GB) online. The graphics card I could swap for a HD 6770 or HD 6870 when it comes out (if it won't lats until the HD 7000-series), and the CPU should last until the computer is ready to bin.
 

Continuity

New member
May 20, 2010
2,050
0
0
Maraveno said:
Continuity said:
Maraveno said:
My point being : My brother bought a grand gaming notebook
There was his mistake right there... "gaming" or no, notebooks are not an ideal gaming platform and you will always pay much more and get much less.
no his notebook works perfectly
That's not the point >< the thing is that he's got everying that was ace back then and it's allready outdated
No that's exactly the point, the laptop cost a lot more than a desktop and isn't upgradeable like a desktop. The PC gaming platform is not typified by notebooks.
 

GuideBot

New member
Feb 25, 2010
199
0
0
AndyFromMonday said:
GuideBot said:
Irridium said:
Well if you could do that then why not just by a PC?
Incredibly, upgradeability is but one of many features distinguishing PC gaming from console gaming.

Personally, I really value that all consoles of a given type are more or less identical, at least in terms of performance. For example, when playing online, I feel much better knowing that everyone has almost the same hardware, at least as far as the actual processing power and video output goes (though, of course, they may have better/worse screens, audio equipment and so on - still, close as it can get). I think it makes for a far more level playing field.

I also like how games will just run on consoles. You seldom need to worry about crashes, performance issues or hardware worries. I wouldn't like to change that.
How does exact hardware make for a level playing field? Last time I checked, the most important thing when it comes to online play is your connection rather than your hardware so you can never have a "level" playing field.

In regards to your comments about crashes and performance issues. Games seldom crash on PC. In fact, I can't even remember the last time a game crashed. Ironically, when I was playing Red Dead Redemption on my 360 it suddenly froze and I had to restart the console in order to remedy the situation. I can say without a doubt this has not happened on my PC unless I was using something that could hinder the stability of a game (Like mods or trainers).



In regards to performance. You're right, you don't have to worry about games running but if you bothered to buy some hardware neither would you on the PC. Nowadays, you DON'T have to spend thousands of dollars to get a decent gaming PC. My own PC is average when it comes to gaming but I've had no problem running new major releases on High. StarCraft 2, Modern Warfare 2, Splinter Cell: Conviction, Mass Effect 2, BioShock 2, Battlefield: Bad Company 2(Though this one was horribly optimized.), Dragon Age etc. So, whilst this is a decent argument you can achieve the same results using your PC quite cheaply if you ask me.

In regards to hardware. You DO have to worry about hardware. Depending on how long a console generation lasts you WILL end up having to upgrade your console(aka hardware). Not only that but you have to worry about hardware crashing. The Red Ring of Death and the Yellow Light of Death are both realities when it comes to console gaming whilst I'll have no problem with my hardware as long as I take the time to dust it now and then.


OT: Like Irridium said, you're better off just getting enough money for a gaming PC.
All completely fair points, well made.

I used to be a PC gamer, and I totally agree that it can be very rewarding. I think what killed it for me was all that potential gaming time I lost to the PC. For example, at least once annually, I'd turn on my computer to be greeted with some kind of fuck-up that required a complete format-reinstall session. Also, I'm a very social gamer, and I like to play lots of games with my friends physically present. When I think of all the hours I've lost trying to play LAN games with friends, I nearly shake with rage. It's not just the setting up of a working network; we got good at that, although it could still take an hour to get everyones machines talking. It's the way that PC games always seem to find a way to screw up your fun; not the same version of the game, not the same version of the maps, not enough CD keys (because someone uninstalled the game and only brought their CD for example), random fuck ups where someone can't join the games on the network, frequent crashes when things finally work (and when they don't), issues with firewalls, random other software and processes screwing up our games... you know the things I mean. Anything that happens and means that we can't spend 100% of our valuable time enjoying videogames.

And before you say that all of the above problems are basically my fault for not having a good enough machine or knowing how to run it or keep it free of irritating software or keeping track of my game versions and CD keys, I should point out that I'm excellent at these things, but not everyone at the LAN events is and it only takes one to ruin the games. I also admit that I've probably been unlucky with my PC death rate (annual format-reinstalls aren't the norm).

I guess my issue is that when I want to play videogames with friends, that's what I want to do, and I felt that with a PC my enjoyment was so diluted that it was no longer efficient recreation.

I sold all my PC related machines (my laptop and my gaming rig and all paraphernalia) and bought a macbook (for non gaming related computing) and a 360, and I've been so much happier a gamer since. The more consoles resemble PCs, the more I worry about going back to the bad old ways.
 

Cpt. Red

New member
Jul 24, 2008
531
0
0
Maraveno said:
Continuity said:
Maraveno said:
My point being : My brother bought a grand gaming notebook
There was his mistake right there... "gaming" or no, notebooks are not an ideal gaming platform and you will always pay much more and get much less.
no his notebook works perfectly
That's not the point >< the thing is that he's got everying that was ace back then and it's allready outdated
If he would have bought a desktop for the same money he wouldn't have a problem maxing things out...
E.g. graphics cards for laptops are usually specifically made for laptops and have markable worse performance then ones for desktops for the same price. Also their best ones can't even come close to the performance of the best desktops ones...

Usually for the cost of a laptop you could get a desktop for half the price with the same performance.
 

TheComedown

New member
Aug 24, 2009
1,553
0
0
Maraveno said:
My point being : My brother bought a grand gaming notebook
I got to there and couldn't take you seriously any more, he spent a grand on a gaming laptop? You do know they don't have much power and generally have relatively short life cycles. And if your only going to spend a grand on a laptop of course you wont be maxing everything out, when you buy a "gaming laptop" you pay twice as much for half the power, they are a joke.

I have a year old mid range card, 5770, it is still maxing MOST things out, (my processor needs more juice) but as Hateren47 said, the 8800 is still a fine card.

Go and do some research before you start making stupid claims, the price and constantly needing to upgrade stories are a joke, if you know what you are doing you can buy a rig that will last just as long as a console.
 

TheComedown

New member
Aug 24, 2009
1,553
0
0
Hateren47 said:
letting people have access to a reliable source of gaming
With interchangeable parts, the odds of crashes, driver issues, people messing with things they shouldn't be GREATLY increases which will greatly reduce the reliability of consoles and as I've said 100 times before defeats the purpose of console gaming.


Hateren47 said:
heavymedicombo said:
it isnt irrelevant, hardware without software is useless.
Surely you are just trolling now. If by chance you are not, please let me know when you figure out the point you're trying to make. I said the systems in my vision (project X1080, PS4 and the Hoo) would still be simpler than Windows (as in a full blown PC you build your self) and then I lost you.
I hit my head hard here when I read this, he is certainty not trolling, you are just clearly being ignorant, software has everything to do with this whole idea, like heavymedicombo said hardware without software is useless, and software without hardware is also useless, you can have the greatest rig in the world, but without a bios its not going to do shit.

You are drastically over simplifying the whole idea, it will not be as simple as plug and play, and the whole idea that games will still be programmed for the entry level device is also bull shit, look at what happened with the N64 expansion slot, there where quite a few games that wouldn't run without it. Hardware today is not what it was like back then, not even close.

Not to mention there will be other companies making these upgrades as well, this WILL cause more driver issues, because to say that Microsoft will just make all their parts and they will work fine without problems is insanely stupid/ignorant.
 

TheComedown

New member
Aug 24, 2009
1,553
0
0
Maraveno said:
TheComedown said:
Maraveno said:
My point being : My brother bought a grand gaming notebook
I got to there and couldn't take you seriously any more, he spent a grand on a gaming laptop? You do know they don't have much power and generally have relatively short life cycles. And if your only going to spend a grand on a laptop of course you wont be maxing everything out, when you buy a "gaming laptop" you pay twice as much for half the power, they are a joke.

I have a year old mid range card, 5770, it is still maxing MOST things out, (my processor needs more juice) but as Hateren47 said, the 8800 is still a fine card.

Go and do some research before you start making stupid claims, the price and constantly needing to upgrade stories are a joke, if you know what you are doing you can buy a rig that will last just as long as a console.
I can't take you serious
Grand is the equivalent of great I didn't even come close to saying the thing cost a grand
I'm irish sorry pardon me for not conceding to saying AWESOME at everything we say grand
as for example "how are you doing?" "Grand, you?"

Anyway the thing is that it's not affordable
That was a simple miss understanding, a grand is also 1000. Still doesn't change the fact that gaming laptops are underpowered, overpriced, pieces of crap, yeah you'll run a few games on them, but to expect to run everything maxed out for more then a few new games is ridiculous, laptops don't have the greatest (or even decent) GPUs, generally have shit house cooling, and generally 0 options for improvement once bought, cept maybe ram.

To say that you NEED to upgrade every two months is ridiculous based of not yours but your brothers experience with a laptop. Go do some research about GPUs, Processors, motherboards etc, have a look at some benchmarking, and the rate at which new gear is released and then tell me that you NEED to upgrade that frequently.

Allright? ya heard me? GOOD

It's the simple reason why it failed with the nintendo and why we have console gaming in the first place

Could you at least next time read with grammar in mind?
Thank you, that really ticks me off when someone goes off talking demeaning about me when they themselves are the ones completely at a loss
This is all rather irrelevant since it was one small misunderstanding that actually doesn't really effect or change anything I had to say in my original response. You still should actually do some research for yourself, taking your brothers word that PCs need to be upgraded that frequently because he didn't do his research and spent to much on a laptop is stupid.
 

LandoCristo

New member
Apr 2, 2010
560
0
0
Considering that even though it only cost $600 and is three years old, my PS3 is still running all the newest games with the best graphics. Why would I spend money to upgrade the graphics, when the entire tower is basically a graphics card with life-support?
 

V8 Ninja

New member
May 15, 2010
1,902
0
0
Irridium said:
Well if you could do that then why not just by a PC?
This. What's the point of buying a upgradeable console when you could just buy a PC, which does everything that a console can't do and more?
 

mikecoulter

Elite Member
Dec 27, 2008
3,389
5
43
I'm not sure that an upgradable console would be a good idea, could give some players an advantage. Also, that's not really the point of consoles.
 

Hateren47

New member
Aug 16, 2010
578
0
0
TheComedown said:
Hateren47 said:
letting people have access to a reliable source of gaming
With interchangeable parts, the odds of crashes, driver issues, people messing with things they shouldn't be GREATLY increases which will greatly reduce the reliability of consoles and as I've said 100 times before defeats the purpose of console gaming.


Hateren47 said:
heavymedicombo said:
it isnt irrelevant, hardware without software is useless.
Surely you are just trolling now. If by chance you are not, please let me know when you figure out the point you're trying to make. I said the systems in my vision (project X1080, PS4 and the Hoo) would still be simpler than Windows (as in a full blown PC you build your self) and then I lost you.
I hit my head hard here when I read this, he is certainty not trolling, you are just clearly being ignorant, software has everything to do with this whole idea, like heavymedicombo said hardware without software is useless, and software without hardware is also useless, you can have the greatest rig in the world, but without a bios its not going to do shit.

You are drastically over simplifying the whole idea, it will not be as simple as plug and play, and the whole idea that games will still be programmed for the entry level device is also bull shit, look at what happened with the N64 expansion slot, there where quite a few games that wouldn't run without it. Hardware today is not what it was like back then, not even close.

Not to mention there will be other companies making these upgrades as well, this WILL cause more driver issues, because to say that Microsoft will just make all their parts and they will work fine without problems is insanely stupid/ignorant.
Well it is a pretty ridiculous point. Who would release a piece of hardware, which didn't have the appropriate software? And as others have said earlier console expansions have been moderate successes, and the N64 expansion actually made your games look a little better. Also more than a few Nintendo (NES, SNES and N64) games could be seen as hardware expansions themselves because of the added memory in the cartridges. Killer Instinct Gold comes to mind.

heavymedicombo said:
Hateren47 said:
heavymedicombo said:
Hateren47 said:
heavymedicombo said:
Hateren47 said:
heavymedicombo said:
Hateren47 said:
heavymedicombo said:
Hateren47 said:
Irridium said:
Well if you could do that then why not just by a PC?
It would still be a lot simpler than Windows.
riiiiiiiiight, even though xbox runs off a modified windows.
Sure it runs Windows. Kinda like how the iPad runs of a modified Snow Leopard. Kinda like not at all.
hey it does. its cause microsoft only wants to use their system.
The Xbox runs "Xbox Dashboard" and Xbox 360 runs "Xbox 360 Dashboard". It's not Windows and although it's gonna end up looking like Windows Phone 7 it's not that either.
i said modified version.
It has not thing to do with Windows. It can work with a Windows PC but it's completely different. The two don't even share the same filesystem. It's irrelevant to the thread as well.
it isnt irrelevant, hardware without software is useless.
Surely you are just trolling now. If by chance you are not, please let me know when you figure out the point you're trying to make. I said the systems in my vision (project X1080, PS4 and the Hoo) would still be simpler than Windows (as in a full blown PC you build your self) and then I lost you.
sorry, that was my brother, he likes to be a dick and troll the places i go on.
I do think that an upgradeable console is not a good idea however (well I'm here) because you would have to be able to upgrade all of it, because otherwise some parts woould become obselete and also because it would mean that console devs would have to add graphical change options rather than the standard flat rate.
No harm, no fault mate. But tell your brother to make his own account if he wants to make a fool of himself. And yes developers would have the opportunity to add the option of Anti Aliasing, increased draw distance, more characters on screen and generally better graphics but you would not lose anything if you didn't upgrade. You would indeed miss out on something, but not really lose anything. Consoles does not have particular good graphics and this would be an opportunity for them to get quality approaching the PC in this department. It would not be a PC because it would still have a way simpler OS that doesn't do anything other that play games and watch/stream video.

Wilson Driesens said:
Considering that even though it only cost $600 and is three years old, my PS3 is still running all the newest games with the best graphics. Why would I spend money to upgrade the graphics, when the entire tower is basically a graphics card with life-support?
The PS3 is generally a nice piece of hardware but it does not have, what I would consider, even good graphics and certainly not the best. And it could really need a memory boost as it only have 256MB RAM and 256 VRAM.
 

Hateren47

New member
Aug 16, 2010
578
0
0
V8 Ninja said:
Irridium said:
Well if you could do that then why not just by a PC?
This. What's the point of buying a upgradeable console when you could just buy a PC, which does everything that a console can't do and more?
What's the point in buying a PC for gaming only? To not be stuck with the same hardware for 10 years if you ask me. Sure it does a lot more than gaming, but for gaming and looking past the mouse and keyboard, being able to update your graphics to play a newer game at a reasonable frame rate, resolution and overall realistic look(if going for picture perfect realism, like Crysis) is a big part of it. I didn't realise that "walled gardens" would make people as ignorant as to believe their 4-5-6 year old hardware is top of the pops. I actually thought they would like to update it without having to wait for the next console 6-5-4 years down the line.
 

TheComedown

New member
Aug 24, 2009
1,553
0
0
Hateren47 said:
TheComedown said:
you should learn to snip
Well it is a pretty ridiculous point. Who would release a piece of hardware, which didn't have the appropriate software? And as others have said earlier console expansions have been moderate successes, and the N64 expansion actually made your games look a little better. Also more than a few Nintendo (NES, SNES and N64) games could be seen as hardware expansions themselves because of the added memory in the cartridges. Killer Instinct Gold comes to mind.
You're still missing the point, drivers are not simply just plug and play, you put in your card install the drivers and pray to god you got the right version, and chance are if this upgradable console thing gets put in practice hardware manufactures will release driver updates, and if your upgrading multiple parts you will run into conflicts or the new version will actually bug out etc. It happens all the time with current graphics cards, I had a performance loss when I upgraded to the newest drivers so I rolled back to the previous version, when you encounter this kind of thing on a console you will be WAY to constricted to actually test and fix these kinds of errors. If tools are released(they will need to be) for the consoles to diagnose and fix this issues look at that you again have completely removed the advantage console owners have by taking away the simplicity.

Did you build your computer from scratch?