I think it's funny that a media organisation is so out of touch that it is asking whether something is legal rather than reporting the practical reality that the administration doesn't care if its legal.Would be a good next step, but could go even bolder.Trump suggests deporting U.S. citizens who commit crimes: Is it legal?
NBC News' Lawrence Hurley reports on the legal questions surrounding President Trump's suggestion that "homegrown" criminals who have been convicted of certain crimes should be deported.www.nbcnews.com
Yeah considering the SCOTUS just said they have to bring back the other guy from El Salvador and they flat out said they wouldn't, whether something is legal or not is truly only relevant if the democrat are in power.
Not every one of his properties. Only seven of his skyscrapers are actually called some variant of Trump Tower and while all of those actually have his name written upon them, that's not the case for most of his other properties. A little detail I picked up from that article about how Trump fits a number of prophecies about the Antichrist, where they were suggesting that those seven Trump Towers and their combined 10 antennae were the seven heads and ten horns.
What else would you expect form the "lawless one"?
Although that is technically legal, at least at a superficial level. The court's demands come with limits: if another country decides to not let the USA recover a deportee, it's not like the courts can oblige the US government to infringe that country's sovereignty.
And then they get all offended when the rest of the world doesn’t want their disgusting chlorine chicken and unsafe cars.Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?Trump and DOGE Are Planning Deregulation at a Massive Scale
The White House will soon move to rapidly repeal or freeze rules that affect health, food, workplace safety, transportation and more.www.nytimes.com
There's an interesting point: both public health laws, and international/domestic laws on deportations & residency, contained stipulations that they could only be bypassed in cases of grave danger or emergency. But were (unavoidably) subjective on what those grounds might be.
My point of posting was that the Biden administration didn't care either. The fact that they had to backdoor the vaccine mandate through OSHA, I knew that shit was illegal.
I think it's asinine that you guys point out how bad it is when the other team does something, but shut your mouths when your team does the same thing.
I'm not convinced that a vaccine mandate and a mass deportation *are* the same thing, and I'm not convinced that a global pandemic and 200 people with tattoos legally residing in the US are situations of equivalent severity.
www.theguardian.com
Keep in mind which one Phoenixmgs thinks is a greater threat to him. (Hint: It's the brown people. He thinks the brown people are a greater threat to him.)
