>This electionx.com
x.com
Kamala has the WAP lady and Trump has Hulk Hogan? What the fuck are we even doing, this election is a fuck circus.
>This electionx.com
x.com
Kamala has the WAP lady and Trump has Hulk Hogan? What the fuck are we even doing, this election is a fuck circus.
You said the word "deliberately".Except it did happen, didn't it?
You can question whether Trump intended them to attack and sack the Capitol. But he most certainly set that train in motion, and judging by the attested evidence he sat around watching the riot on TV and refusing to help, he seemed perfectly happy that they did sack it.
Trump and LBJ are quite comparable in many ways... I've been saying that to you for years. LBJ is worse in every conceivable way, but there is a comparison in quality, just not magnitude. But the biggest difference between the two is outside of the men themselves within the things said about them. The widespread lies go in LBJs favor but against Trump. LBJs policy accomplishments were abysmal, he planted seeds for everything wrong right now to satiste his ego and fill his wife's bank account.Whether or not it's what you said, it is what you do. Trump does something bad, and you claim a president - any president - has done something relatively similar (and even then sometimes not as severe). What this is effectively doing is defending Trump's misconduct through comparison to multiple presidents' misconduct.
In many ways, LBJ is perhaps an ideal comparison for Trump: a vast raft of personal failings such as sexual assault, fraud, habitual dishonesty, crudeness and insults. Arguably, Trump is very similar to LBJ... except without the competence and policy accomplishments. And yet it's funny that you won't offer LBJ an inch, but fall over yourself to offer excuses for Trump on so many issues. It's your inconsistency, not mine.
Yes I did. You might also note I said "deliberately... march on Congress to pressure Congress into not honouring an election result" because that's what he did. I did not say he deliberately told them to turn violent, invade and sack the Capitol.You said the word "deliberately".
And as I think I pointed out at the time: so why do you then treat them so differently?Trump and LBJ are quite comparable in many ways... I've been saying that to you for years.
Maybe if I say "that didn't happen" six more times, you'll stop being deliberately wrong.Yes I did. You might also note I said "deliberately... march on Congress to pressure Congress into not honouring an election result" because that's what he did. I did not say he deliberately told them to turn violent, invade and sack the Capitol.
Yes. Correcting the record is inherently relative to what the record is.LBJ deserves to be damned and Trump salvaged for their comparable sins why...? Just because LBJ is widely admired by many for his policy achievements?
What has this WAP lady done that would be equally reprehensible to being racist while fucking your friend wife?x.com
x.com
Kamala has the WAP lady and Trump has Hulk Hogan? What the fuck are we even doing, this election is a fuck circus.
"Democrats respond to criticism of their cynical use of race in politics by cynically accusing politician of racism."Donald Trump falsely suggests Kamala Harris misled voters about her race
Donald Trump falsely suggested Kamala Harris had misled voters about her race as the former president appeared before the National Association of Black Journalists in an interview that quickly turned hostile.apnews.com
View attachment 11573
*The whole interview was pretty insane. Do not do a shot every time Trump says "black" in a weird context.
People making fun of you aren't angry.I'm enjoying the new tactic of just calling far right peeps weird. They get soooooo angry about it! I love it.
I wonder if that will backfire in the form of taking what was I take to be a genuine reaction to behaviour/values/rhetoric and applying it more broadly to things that one can see as weird but still has a greater support and therefore not considered as weird until the adjective ceases to have any impact.I'm enjoying the new tactic of just calling far right peeps weird. They get soooooo angry about it! I love it.
Is there a scientific study on this proclamation where it was shown it's impossible to be angry at someone if you're also mocking them?People making fun of you aren't angry.
No, but I want you to understand that your next two posts aren't making anyone angry, you just look a little silly.Is there a scientific study on this proclamation where it was shown it's impossible to be angry at someone if you're also mocking them?
Bitches in boxstands will say and do anything for people's money and attention.
That's not what you claimed, you said if you're mocking someone you can't also be angry at them.No, but I want you to understand that your next two posts aren't making anyone angry, you just look a little silly.
I didn't remotely say that.That's not what you claimed, you said if you're mocking someone you can't also be angry at them.