Always glass half full with you, eh? Or a child half dressed.and associating that sort of behavior with Epstein might push people to understand the seriousness of that issue.
Last edited:
Always glass half full with you, eh? Or a child half dressed.and associating that sort of behavior with Epstein might push people to understand the seriousness of that issue.
Calling this a distraction from Epstein is a gross mislabeling, I'd say.Well, that's just annoyingly distracting![]()
Donald Trump orders new military operation
Hegseth said the effort, led by Joint Task Force Southern Spear and U.S. Southern Command, is intended to “defend the homeland” and remove criminal networks from the region.www.newsweek.com
So you say, but you can point to nothing except your interpretation of that one word, insisting it only meant what you say. Even though examples abound of it meaning other things, and you've now been shown a dictionary entry published in 1980 of it meaning other things.Yes, but your understanding is the one that you want in your mind rather than the one you perceive, and it makes your view of the whole world a disjointed mess that makes no sense, where all the puzzle pieces are too warped and damaged to fit back together.
I have investigated the history of the movement. But unlike you, i have engaged with what the people involved actually said and did.You do not have to take my word for anything, you can set aside the understanding of things that you want now and look at the past and see how the original piece fit into the whole.
I tried to put a picture but the forum seems to not be having it. Let's try linking to the address:And its also the only peg you have.
And what exactly are the aims and demands there? "We demand our rights". "You can't shove us back in the closet". After the only out politician in the US was murdered.I tried to put a picture but the forum seems to not be having it. Let's try linking to the address:
Incidentally, assassinated by someone with clear mental problems who himself has been grossly misrepresented in terms of what was used to show his mental instability. Dan White is often considered to have basically gotten away with murder with a "diminished capacity" reduction of his culpability due to a very bad simplification known as the Twinkie Defense. Many laypeople think the argument was that White switching to a diet of Twinkies as snacks was basically the whole defense's argument to show his mental state was not such to truly discern right from wrong. However, what was actually being argued was that it was severe depression that caused the diminished capacity, and the way Twinkies played into it was that it was used as evidence for Dan White's severe depression, as he had been a former fitness advocate that had suddenly switched to an unhealthy snack diet, showing his shift in mental state was severe.And what exactly are the aims and demands there? "We demand our rights". "You can't shove us back in the closet". After the only out politician in the US was murdered.
So... what, you're just objecting to the assertiveness? The tone? Are you conflating that (completely justified) outrage with some other unspoken aim to somehow oppress straight people?
Get a grip.
At this point, they use news on Epstein as a distract from Epstein.Calling this a distraction from Epstein is a gross mislabeling, I'd say.
As a person who had actually worked in a high school... no. Friends who arent teachers.... no. The closest might be when we were 18 or 19 ourselvesI wish the age range and circumstances were mentioned more often though, because people get this really abstract idea of an island of child sex trafficking that doesn't involve them, where I think just about everyone has seen someone at some point take sexual advantage of high schoolers or at least express a desire to (and of course the mountain of representation in media that subject gets), and associating that sort of behavior with Epstein might push people to understand the seriousness of that issue.
Ah.... you, of all people, are complaining about people making mountains out of mole hills?There is a difference between middle class people overspending on things and people like the Trumps or Musks investing in like 20 things and only needing one of things things to hit; they can't be successful if they only try on bet on a few things that they think will actually hit.
Maybe she thought she was trying to improve themselves just switching companies for the same exact job, but that job itself isn't something you'd want to stay in. She is also very much like my mom that turns every little molehill into a mountain, so she easily gets overwhelmed by doing anything sorta big or a big change. She has some excuse for literally everything for why she can't do certain things even down to she has to drink pop because she can't drink water for some reason (oh, "I" can't do that because some unique/special thing that "I" have; no, you can do that, you just don't want to). Yeah, it is almost pointless to try to help such people unless they are family essentially or else you would just lose the friendship.
What the hell are you talking about? I was the one saying how everyone overreacted to covid. I went to the bar more in 2020 than I did in my whole life. I got covid before anything was even done in the US so I literally didn't care about it because I didn't have to; natural immunity. It was your guys' "science" trying to act like natural immunity wasn't a thing which made no sense because if natural immunity doesn't work than your vaccine doesn't work either. When you look at the entirely of what people did for covid precautions (pre vaccination), it actually made people more susceptible covid.Ah.... you, of all people, are complaining about people making mountains out of mole hills?
I dont know how many times you have blamed everyone else instead of your own research
Also, anytime MAGA or MAHA blame experts or say Fake News, its exactly the same thing. At least your mum and friend dont make everyone problem
You know what, I'll contest that image. If Hillary were putting out, Bill wouldn't have had to go to Lewinski or Trump.
No opinion on the explicit callout of gay men who present to "het"? Nothing about the bloody axe?And what exactly are the aims and demands there? "We demand our rights". "You can't shove us back in the closet". After the only out politician in the US was murdered.
So... what, you're just objecting to the assertiveness? The tone? Are you conflating that (completely justified) outrage with some other unspoken aim to somehow oppress straight people?
Get a grip.
?! No, not really, because that's completely irrelevant to your original point. You seem to have just shifted to arguing that sometimes they were rude or mean. Yes. Some were.No opinion on the explicit callout of gay men who present to "het"?
Not really. Swords, axes, spears etc are extremely common graphic choices for countless movements.Nothing about the bloody axe?
I'm perfectly aware there were competing movements; I am better informed about the history of the gay rights movement than you are.At some point, you're going to have to concede that it's not just one thing, there were competing movements advocating for gay rights, some of whom were not interested in a live and let live world. Then you can consider which of these groups Pride came out of. Perhaps the name Fight Repression of Erotic Expression is a hint...
We live in a world where a clinically insane woman foaming at the mouth about space lasers.....is the sane one! America what are you DOING!?
It can't be that innocuous of a name. It has "fight" right there in the title. As we all know, anyone trying to get rights ever has just gotten them politely asking, so to even stand up for yourself firmly means you are in the wrong. Just look at how peaceful everything in the Bible is. That's how things should be done. This is complete sarcasm, in case it isn't blooming obvious.?! No, not really, because that's completely irrelevant to your original point. You seem to have just shifted to arguing that sometimes they were rude or mean. Yes. Some were.
Not really. Swords, axes, spears etc are extremely common graphic choices for countless movements.
I'm perfectly aware there were competing movements; I am better informed about the history of the gay rights movement than you are.
"Pride" came from within FREE (which, by the way, is a perfectly innocuous name; fighting repression of erotic expression is a perfectly valid description). Pride then gradually became a wider umbrella encompassing countless groups and the wider movement. It was understood as a demand for equal rights, human respect and an end to discrimination and repression.
This is perfectly in line with how the word "pride" was understood-- and dictionary defined-- even during the 1970s. It is attested in their writings, words and material (some of which was a bit mean or rude!)