Shame, I feel sorry for you American citizens, getting the rep that actually belongs to your government. Hey, at least your president doesn't have 20 children!James Raynor said:I wish my country would stfu already.
Shame, I feel sorry for you American citizens, getting the rep that actually belongs to your government. Hey, at least your president doesn't have 20 children!James Raynor said:I wish my country would stfu already.
And many are free if you don't have an internet cap! I have a cap and do not pirate so this isn't an option, besides, older games are all suddenly on special from $5-$10.twm1709 said:Well, I'm from argentina. Part of the reason piracy is so rampant here is because prices are ridiculous as opposed to any other countries. To make a clear picture out of this. 1 videogame is around 120-150 U$S while the average salary is 400 U$S.
sure you can preach about the importance of "keeping it legal" but it only goes so far with most people. especially if pirate copies are sold almost EVERYWHERE and priced at less than 5 U$S.
Fair enough. But it was two. C'mon.Aurora219 said:Whoa! Chill! I'm English, and I'm just tired of the Brits diving headlong into every war the US starts. It's not bullshit, it's opinion.Steelfists said:Yes, because the UK government wants to protect billions of pounds in tax revenue and countless jobs in various entertainment industries they are America's lap dog. Think things through before you go on spouting a load of bullshit.Aurora219 said:Actually, I believe that the UK (I can't speak for Australia) is just an American puppet/lap dog, rather than a co-conspirator.ZippyDSMlee said:And I call out the USA,Britain and Australia to be fascist states trying to steal the rights and freedoms of the worlds populaces by ensuring no one questions the absolute rights of copyright owners......
Our government is just too feeble to stand up for itself and tell America where to go. If a political party (and not those damn BNP jerks) proclaimed they'd stop the country being so in awe of the US and stop following them around like a fool, then I'd vote for them.
They have adapted. A rising share of their business is done online, and they have realised they can't continue to inflate prices to ridiculous levels.7ru7h said:Quite easily, just look at the Recording Industry. All they had to do was desperately cling to an obsolete business model, sue anyone they thought may have been infringing on their rights (kids, old people, dead people, people without computers), and lobby the fuck out of Congress to have them change the laws so they don't have to innovate while giving them more and more unneeded power over their rights.Steelfists said:If they are obsolete how can they still function?Hopeless Bastard said:I love it. The US government as a mouthpiece for corpulent corporations built around obsolete business models.
That's not even mentioning the fact that, despite increasing piracy, the entertainment industries are making record profits every year. Which means if anything is affecting these workers, it's the companies own greed.Hubilub said:I call immediate bullcrap.Austin MacKenzie said:The Trade Representative estimates 18 million American workers are affected by the piracy issues
They have no way of proving that. As so many people before me have stated, one pirated game does not equal a lost sale, and so they can't have created a statistic for how many workers are affected.
Sure, they adapted, but that was after they were forced to by all the bad PR they got from their anti-filesharing crusades (suing all those poeple, the Sony rootkit, ect) and the fact that no one would buy their over priced crapSteelfists said:They have adapted. A rising share of their business is done online, and they have realised they can't continue to inflate prices to ridiculous levels.7ru7h said:Quite easily, just look at the Recording Industry. All they had to do was desperately cling to an obsolete business model, sue anyone they thought may have been infringing on their rights (kids, old people, dead people, people without computers), and lobby the fuck out of Congress to have them change the laws so they don't have to innovate while giving them more and more unneeded power over their rights.Steelfists said:If they are obsolete how can they still function?Hopeless Bastard said:I love it. The US government as a mouthpiece for corpulent corporations built around obsolete business models.
Well, you obviously haven't heard of the DMCA (which horribly limited consumer rights on digital media) which was passed after much lobbying to congress. Or the ACTA treaty which is being hammered out behind closed doors with little to no public input on what they want (that's being handled by industry insiders). Fun fact, the ACTA treaty, if accepted by the nations of the world, would bring ridiculous copyright restrictions to the world.And surely the fact that they were able to get Congress to change the law (are you sure thats true?) shows that their business model isn't obselete?
To be honest what we are arguing over right now is the definition of obsolete. Its a bit pointless really.7ru7h said:Sure, they adapted, but that was after they were forced to by all the bad PR they got from their anti-filesharing crusades (suing all those poeple, the Sony rootkit, ect) and the fact that no one would buy their over priced crapSteelfists said:They have adapted. A rising share of their business is done online, and they have realised they can't continue to inflate prices to ridiculous levels.7ru7h said:Quite easily, just look at the Recording Industry. All they had to do was desperately cling to an obsolete business model, sue anyone they thought may have been infringing on their rights (kids, old people, dead people, people without computers), and lobby the fuck out of Congress to have them change the laws so they don't have to innovate while giving them more and more unneeded power over their rights.Steelfists said:If they are obsolete how can they still function?Hopeless Bastard said:I love it. The US government as a mouthpiece for corpulent corporations built around obsolete business models.
Well, you obviously haven't heard of the DMCA (which horribly limited consumer rights on digital media) which was passed after much lobbying to congress. Or the ACTA treaty which is being hammered out behind closed doors with little to no public input on what they want (that's being handled by industry insiders). Fun fact, the ACTA treaty, if accepted by the nations of the world, would bring ridiculous copyright restrictions to the world.And surely the fact that they were able to get Congress to change the law (are you sure thats true?) shows that their business model isn't obselete?
And how is it that a business model is not obsolete when it has to be held up by congress?
Dunno if anyone answered your question, but the Trade reps are passing grades on nations to deal with in regards to piracy. Doesn't mean too much but it affects where companies are going to do business in the future.Assassin Xaero said:This is probably a dumb question, but what does this even mean? Is the US pretty much telling other countries to make pirating illegal and crack down on it or what?
No, they sure as hell are not allowed to do that. Any evidence of a crime gathered without a warrant signed by a judge is thrown out. If they don't have a warrant, you're more than within your rights to tell them to stay out.Bretty said:Police able to go into your house without whatever you call them
You should read the Patriot act closely my friend.Nerdygamer89 said:No, they sure as hell are not allowed to do that. Any evidence of a crime gathered without a warrant signed by a judge is thrown out. If they don't have a warrant, you're more than within your rights to tell them to stay out.Bretty said:Police able to go into your house without whatever you call them