Valve: Everything We Do Competes Against Half-Life 2

slightly evil

New member
Feb 18, 2010
391
0
0
Yeha, but [however the hell you do italics] everything [end italics] is competing with HL2. Well, if anything can over throw it it'll be Portal 2, which I'm still naively hoping will be the greatest thing ever
Aditionally, you know, since HL2-and-a-bit was pretty much more of the same, why not make the fricking 3rd one? you're using the same engine, hell, some of us could design the levels for you if that's what it takes
 

Tom Phoenix

New member
Mar 28, 2009
1,161
0
0
Jiraiya72 said:
Half Life 2 wasn't even that great. It's as overrated as FF7.
To be honest, considering how many people have said the same thing about FF7, I would say it almost qualifies as underrated at this point. I am not saying you are not entitled to your opinion, just that hating on FF7 has become as much of a fad as blindly praising it.

Anyway, while Portal was a great game and I am sure that both Left 4 Dead and Team Fortress are good in their own right, I will always consider the Half-Life series to be the pinnacle of Valve's creativity and game design.

Of course, people are entitled to their own tastes, but I personally enjoyed Half-Life 2. While the story was a bit on the cliché side (invasion from aliens? NO WAY! :p), it had strong characterisation, great variety in environments and enemies and an excellent soundtrack. Also, while the graphics aren't necessarilly the most important thing in a game, Half-Life 2's graphical presentation is excellent and holds up very well even to this day.

Overall, Half-Life 2 was a worthy successor to the original (although, I wouldn't call it superior necessarilly; there are enough differences between the two that they can stand side-by-side as equals)) and I am immensely looking forward to what Valve will do with the last part of the trilogy (whenever that happens).
 

KCL

New member
Jan 12, 2010
44
0
0
JeanLuc761 said:
Slow =/= bad pacing.
Pacing is how you create the sense of slowness or speed that gives shape to a narrative. Half-Life 2 is an absolute mess from a narratological standpoint.

JeanLuc761 said:
Regardless of whether or not you liked the game though, all I'm saying is that stating your opinion as fact is egotistical; that's all I'm trying to get across here.
All I'm saying is that stating your opinion that stating my opinion as fact is egotistical as fact is egotistical.
 

Denizen

New member
Jan 29, 2010
259
0
0
I built my computer rig around all of the recommended settings for HL2 back when it came out. Before i moved onto a newer rig, it's performance exceeded many others (friend's computers) almost in the same spirit as Valve has said here.

It's just hard to compete with careful design and care.
 

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,077
0
0
I'm not a shooter guy. When I think Valve I don't think Half-Life. I think Steam. And I LOVE them.
 

LockeDown

New member
Sep 27, 2009
354
0
0
mandrilltiger said:
Half Life 2 is to "FPS"'s as Mario 64 is to "Platformers"
If you mean that both are incorrectly credited with radically-changing or defining their respective genre, then you are correct, and I say this as a fan of Mario 64.

Half-Life 2 is a good FPS (not my personal cup of tea due to a few technical issues with the game, and its ludicrously slow pace). But you know what else is a good FPS? Quake, Wolfenstein, Doom (I have to mention it), Turok: Dinosaur Hunter (the one for the 64), Goldeneye 007, and even Halo (despite all the flak it gets).

But why is it only okay to rant and rave about how good HL2 is? Why is it immune to the same criticism of, say, Halo: Combat Evolved? They both have their good and bad, and yet anyone who prefers the silent protagonist of Gordan Freeman is welcomed here with open arms, while anyone who dares to claim that Halo might actually be a halfway decent series is immediately alienated and harassed by the community.

Just because a game was good, and happened to be for the PC, does not mean it's the greatest game ever. It also does not mean that any games released in that genre that comes out for a competing platform is inferior (at least not solely by virtue of being released on a different platform).
 

JeanLuc761

New member
Sep 22, 2009
1,479
0
0
KCL said:
All I'm saying is that stating your opinion that stating my opinion as fact is egotistical as fact is egotistical.
And I said you were stating your opinion as fact...when?
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Straying Bullet said:
Irridium said:
Makes sense. Considering the game is mentioned and loved everywhere on the internet.
Not me. I totally loved the Machinma regarding the Gordan Freeman mind series. It made the series much more appealing because:

1. The voice fits him perfectly.
2. I love observing the game but not play it myself.
3. The game is mediocore.

AM I A HERETIC NOA!!? - Cried. -
I forgot to finish my post.

I meant to say its "mentioned and loved/hated everywhere on the internet".
 

Wakefield

New member
Aug 3, 2009
827
0
0
LesIsMore said:
I hate to reiterate what's already been said, but this raises a point: if everything you're doing is competing against one game, wouldn't it make sense to finish the last part of that game so you can move on?
Listen to him, for he is a smart man.
 

HT_Black

New member
May 1, 2009
2,845
0
0
I'm hardly surprised-- that game is this industry's answer to God. Of course you'd end up competing against it.
 

Pearwood

New member
Mar 24, 2010
1,929
0
0
Valve - "All of our games are compared to our flagship game".

... When did Valve hire Captain Obvious as a spokesman?
 
Aug 1, 2010
2,768
0
0
WELL THEN MAYBE YOU SHOULD RELEASE HALF-LIFE FUCKING 3! BLAAAAAARRRRG!!!

"takes rage pills"

"ahem"

That is fairly obvious Valve since the same thing happens to every company.
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,451
0
0
Delusibeta said:
*insert comment about the continuing absence of any information about Half Life 2 Episode 3 Half Life 3 here*.
I'm still making my way through the Half Life 2s...but yes ^that's basically what I was thinking xD
 

Grigori361

New member
Apr 6, 2009
409
0
0
Z of the Na said:
Ironman126 said:
Z of the Na said:
[small]Speaking of Left 4 Dead in comparison to their sales, I wonder when they will be releasing Left 4 Dead and Left 4 Dead 2 for Mac...[/small]
Just as soon as Mac's can handle the graphical demands put on the system by those games. Integrated video card/motherboards just won't cut it.
I understand your concern, but my Macbook Pro that I am presently typing on can handle the entire Orange Box on max settings. In the past, I used a Windows 7 partition on my hard drive and played Left 4 Dead and Left 4 Dead 2 on there without any problems, all on this Macbook Pro.

That kind of blows the whole "Macs can't handle it" aspect right out of the water.

[small]I can also right click, I use a real mouse...[/small]
I can second that I run the whole orange box on a mac too with a windows partition.