Their excuse isn't limitations... their excuse is they don't want to charge for content that should be free.Zachary Amaranth said:You're right. And that's exactly why you should be blaming Valve.silver wolf009 said:Perhaps I should clarify that, stop releasing games for the 360 and PS3. (Hold your venom PC elitist, so what if I am a 360 player and not a PC player, I deserve no less quality for my money.)
I know this is an unpopular statement, because zomgilovevalvesteamsteamsteam! But here's the problem: Tons of companies have put out additional content on the 360 in the exact sort of way Valve claims is not possible. Valve. Lies. Microsoft does, too, but one doesn't need to take them at their word here.
Valve is a monopoly, one which is all smiles when it gets things its way. When refused that kind of control, they huff and puff and take their ball and go home. Microsoft and Sony don't play that game? Screw them, we're not sitting with them at lunch.
Valve got your money, though. They'll still happily take it from you, and they really don't care beyond that. They're more genial with products released for PC and specifically on Steam, because they're marketing Steam. This is actually quite similar to the way Wal-Mart operates. And, like Wal-Mart, any friendly face aimed at you is a hollow front. But look at it on the bright side: Sony caved, and you'll see the monopoly operate on their own terms on the PS3.
VALVe is an awesome company and you sound very jaded. How you can think anything else after the number of free upgrades they've given TF2 is mind boggling. Everyone paid $50/60 expecting three games. PC users were surprised to find that this $60 provided them with years of game updates. PS3/Xbox users on the other hand did not. However, your $60 only entitled you to those three games, not the updates.
Also, they're not a monopoly. There's how many companies that make shooters?