Actually, Steam was revolutionary, before Steam, video game digital distribution was practically non-existent and if it did exist then it did a very poor job.mad825 said:Steam is good but not awesome or Revolutional. Steam is still DRM and DRM is bad because of the problems and potential problems that come with DRM. In a nutshell, it's Apple of all DRM which in itself is a kinda good and bad thing. simplification may seem good but it removes options.
So let me get this straight, you're criticizing Valve for giving modders and small indie teams the chance to have their hardwork turned into a full fledged, top quality product?Orks da best said:nonsense snipped
The only true valve games are the half-life ones. All the other games are either: Mods, made by another company that is taken over by valve and the game is relesed with a valve logo, or a remake of another developers game "dota 2 anyone?"
Valve tends to hire small teams or unestablished developers. EA doesn't "allow" companies to keep their logo on the games, EA exploits the name of once acclaimed studios, eg. Westwood.Orks da best said:At least EA allows the company to keep their logo on their games.
HL3 is nothing like Duke Forever. First of all, Valve has remained active and hasn't been draining funds from investors as 3D Realms did. Secondly, it really hasn't been that long since HL2E2.Orks da best said:Also valve is sorta sadistic, remeber that April's fools joke? the one about half-life 3?, the only developer that could that is valve, and get away with it.
Meanwhile Half-life 3, or episode 3 are becoming the new Duke Nukem Forever of gaming, jokes and all.
I don't know if you noticed but a ton of developers love Valve. Many indie devs have found incredible success thanks to Steam.Orks da best said:Yes valve may be friendly to theire fans and customers, but what about other developers? how many games have you brought retail and yet needed to install steam to use? How many developers have lost their titles to the valve beast? How long till the gaming culture is overrun with valvies?
So here's the thing. You seem like you have absolutely no clue what you're talking -- this is why you'll get flamed. You seem to be doing little more than trying your best to go against the grain, all while being terribly uninformed on the issues you present.Orks da best said:Valve may be a good developer, but there also the worst kind of evil"the one that looks and acts nice, but fools into doing there every order, so your helpless to fight back when they attack."
Now to head to my deep underground flame, acid, bullet, bomb, atom bomb, magic, and any other weapon you can think of bunker.
Yeah, it still doesn't. At least not in any useful way.Kaleion said:If the servers went down for any random reason you wouldn't be able to play you're single player games since, at least last time I checked[footnote]Granted last time I checked was quite some time ago[/footnote] steam offline didn't work at all
And when they brought the games in, Valve added their fantastic humour, made a great story and polished till it was awesome. They did not invent the idea, thats for sure, but they brought the ideas much further, than they would have gotten on their own.Rednog said:No, Portal, Team Fortress, and Left 4 Dead were all originally mods and or developed by people outside of valve and then brought in.KingsGambit said:False. They also gave us Portal, Team Fortress, Left 4 Dead and a handful of others.Orks da best said:The only true valve games are the half-life ones. All the other games are either: Mods, made by another company that is taken over by valve and the game is relesed with a valve logo, or a remake of another developers game "dota 2 anyone?"
I love how incredibly vague your reason is here "Steam is still DRM and DRM is bad because of the problems and potential problems that come with DRM,". How about mentioning some of those problems?mad825 said:Steam is good but not awesome or Revolutional. Steam is still DRM and DRM is bad because of the problems and potential problems that come with DRM. In a nutshell, it's Apple of all DRM which in itself is a kinda good and bad thing. simplification may seem good but it removes options.Vkmies said:It did suck. And I was against it up until like 2008 and now I love it. It's awesome. And I have no problem with the offline mode. Only that you can't get achievements is annoying.
I own quite a few games on Steam, I've never encountered a time when I have to go online to play offline...mad825 said:More often than not, you need to be on-line to go off-line. Origin can at least go off-line without having to go on-line.I don't really see what's peoples problems with offline mode. It lets you play games offline. That's more that you can say, say about Origin or Uplay
Whether or not this is down to poor shitty coding is still up in air but it does raise questions why it hasn't been fixed.
Oh yeah alsoLjs1121 said:Because Portal.
Also Half-Life.
Also also Team Fortress.
I'm not really a big fan of Valve, but those three series seem to be the most popular examples given for Valve's status as god of the universe.
Because a monopoly is not necessarily a bad thing. It's just that it generally causes the company that's holding it to become greedy, inflate prices etc. Considering Valve is doing the exact opposite of that and using the fact they have a (relative) monopoly to bring down prices and give more back to the consumer than most companies, people don't generally have a problem with it.Orks da best said:Also, I sorta lied about the title, why is valved loved when they are more or less, a monopolistic company?
Yeah, same can be said of any other company that hires people. Hiring people is good. The fact their logo is not there anymore means it was likely not important enough to the guys who made it (or they'd have fought harder/refused to work for Valve), they were likely content to have a Valve logo there instead and just work for the company.InsipidMadness said:The only true valve games are the half-life ones. All the other games are either: Mods, made by another company that is taken over by valve and the game is relesed with a valve logo, or a remake of another developers game "dota 2 anyone?"
Not railing against EA here, but I'd rather see EA allow companies to keep many other things, like vision and such, than a stupid picture no one's gonna give two shits about.InsipidMadness said:At least EA allows the company to keep their logo on their games.
Anyone who didn't see that joke coming a billion miles away needs to look up the word gullible. Careful, it's not in the standard dictionaries. Also, other companies have done the same tons of times over. Check Blizzard's history for example. It's basically done by any company that has character.InsipidMadness said:Also valve is sorta sadistic, remeber that April's fools joke? the one about half-life 3?, the only developer that could that is valve, and get away with it.
Can you explain how or why that's a bad thing? I've bought games without Steam before and had a "you have x more times to install this game" during reinstalls. I consider it a much worse thing than having my games accessible and downloadable at any time, given an internet connection.InsipidMadness said:Yes valve may be friendly to theire fans and customers, but what about other developers? how many games have you brought retail and yet needed to install steam to use? How many developers have lost their titles to the valve beast? How long till the gaming culture is overrun with valvies?
When has Valve "attacked"? You know what we call an enemy that acts like that, except it doesn't attack? A friend >.>InsipidMadness said:Valve may be a good developer, but there also the worst kind of evil"the one that looks and acts nice, but fools into doing there every order, so your helpless to fight back when they attack."