Warhammer 40K's story, how is it even remotely appealing?

Saviordd1

New member
Jan 2, 2011
2,455
0
0
Admittedly this might be due to over-exposure from a friend who won't shut the hell up about it, but I really can't see the appeal of the story of Warhammer 40K. (I emphasize story because the games are pretty fun gameplay wise)

The entire setting seems like a big case of Darkness Induced Audience Apathy [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DarknessInducedAudienceApathy].

I read through some wiki pages and listened to my friends and have played enough of the games to know the basic premise and factions; and I couldn't give less of rats ass who wins. 90% of the characters are jackasses and the ones who aren't are probably dead knowing this setting, and that's not getting into how there are no actually "good" or even "meh" characters.

Hell reading the wiki alone made me feel uncomfortable, there's no hope, its overly violent and its practically childish; something an "edgy" thirteen year old would make up.

Not to mention its a tad misogynistic (Such as there being limited female soldiers that aren't part of the female only faction, the eldar or the dark eldar) and obviously caters to younger males. (Something that irks me to no end)

Can someone explain the appeal of this universe to me? Because to me it all seems over the top and plain stupid.
 

DoPo

"You're not cleared for that."
Jan 30, 2012
8,665
0
0
I myself think it's pretty kickass. But different strokes for different folks. I actually doubt I can answer your question any better than this, nor do I think anyone else can. You don't like it - whatever, I don't think anyone can either convince you to like it or explain what's to like at this point.
 

Saviordd1

New member
Jan 2, 2011
2,455
0
0
mavkiel said:
No idea, I share your view on warhammer.
Glad someone does.

DoPo said:
I myself think it's pretty kickass. But different strokes for different folks. I actually doubt I can answer your question any better than this, nor do I think anyone else can. You don't like it - whatever, I don't think anyone can either convince you to like it or explain what's to like at this point.
Fair enough
 

Zantos

New member
Jan 5, 2011
3,653
0
0
Obviously it's over the top, you can't start anything with "In the grim dark future of the 41st millennium, there is only war" and then not be over the top.

It's very difficult to pin down exactly why people love it, because it's so vast that each person can love completely different things about it. Though I would say that reading the wiki pages is a bad way to try and understand it for that exact reason.

Believe it or not, the overly violent and no hope parts are actually a big appeal to a lot of people. So is the fact that you can argue until the 41st millennium over who really counts as a good guy or a bad guy between all the factions. Aside from that, with the exception of the Adeptus Astartes and the Adeptus Sororitas there isn't really a gender split (at least on the human side), pretty much all the organisations have a mix of both men and women.

Essentially, you sound like you're already made up on this, but I'd recommend picking up one of the books and giving it a go. Ciaphas Cain and Eisenhorn are pretty good bets. As far as the characters being jackasses go, though there are so many by this point you can't possibly be doing more than picking and choosing or wild speculation for your 90% figure, but their actions and motives do make a lot more sense in context rather than just taken off a wiki page.
 

Saviordd1

New member
Jan 2, 2011
2,455
0
0
Olikar said:
Saviordd1 said:
Hell reading the wiki alone made me feel uncomfortable, there's no hope, its overly violent and its practically childish; something an "edgy" thirteen year old would make up.
A Bioware fan complaining about poor childish writing? *cough* glass houses *cough*
I'm aware the ending sucked all hell, believe me, I have no delusions about that.
 

Olikar

New member
Sep 4, 2012
116
0
0
Saviordd1 said:
Olikar said:
Saviordd1 said:
Hell reading the wiki alone made me feel uncomfortable, there's no hope, its overly violent and its practically childish; something an "edgy" thirteen year old would make up.
A Bioware fan complaining about poor childish writing? *cough* glass houses *cough*
I'm aware the ending sucked all hell, believe me, I have no delusions about that.
It was more than the ending that sucked.
 

DJjaffacake

New member
Jan 7, 2012
492
0
0


Different people like different things. What seems like a point against it to you, may be a point in its favour to other people.
 

Saviordd1

New member
Jan 2, 2011
2,455
0
0
DJjaffacake said:
While I get the logic behind this statement it still baffles me. This is less "Chocolate or Vanilla" and more "This universe literally breaks rules that writing instructors put down to avoid making poor stories"
 

TheBelgianGuy

New member
Aug 29, 2010
365
0
0
Do we really need to have these threads every day?

"I don't like Portal 2! Don't understand why people go on about it!"
"I hated Half Life 2."
"I hated the entire Mass effect series."
"I hated everything Bioware every did except that one game they made 10 years ago out of pure nostalgia blindness."


Yes, yes. We get it. You have an opinion that some of the other 7 billion people on this world do not agree with. It's shocking, but see, opinions are subjective.

If you don't like Warhammer, that's fine. Tell your friend to shut up. Yeah, I get the general feeling you have here. I've seen warhammer fans go on an extreme defensive rant to prove how cool or extreme or epic or how massive the warhammer universe really is, plenty of times. I love warhammer, though I generally don't feel like telling the entire backstory to everybody I know.


PS: You are aware Warhammer is a miniatures tabletop wargame, right? Maybe people find warhammer cool, because they think the game is cool.
 

Zantos

New member
Jan 5, 2011
3,653
0
0
Saviordd1 said:
DJjaffacake said:
While I get the logic behind this statement it still baffles me. This is less "Chocolate or Vanilla" and more "This universe literally breaks rules that writing instructors put down to avoid making poor stories"
So, how are you getting that these are poor stories? From what you've said you've only looked at the wiki and heard from friends, not exactly the best way to judge. I personally quite like the books, at least I've not come across a bad one yet. You might not like the whole military sci-fi/fantasy in a bleak dystopia, but that doesn't make them poor. Same with the tabletop codexs (codices?), and the plots for the games and whatever else they have going. Some may be better written than others, but on the whole it really is just a matter of opinion.
 

Saviordd1

New member
Jan 2, 2011
2,455
0
0
TheBelgianGuy said:
Yeah I wasn't clear, but I'm aware its a tabletop strategy game, and I don't mind that as it looks fun enough.

But I'm not talking about people who find the game fun or cool looking, I'm talking about the people who take the story 100% seriously.

But either way you have a point.
 

Hero in a half shell

It's not easy being green
Dec 30, 2009
4,286
0
0
Saviordd1 said:
DJjaffacake said:
While I get the logic behind this statement it still baffles me. This is less "Chocolate or Vanilla" and more "This universe literally breaks rules that writing instructors put down to avoid making poor stories"
It's a deliberate mish-mash of all the common sci-fi cliches ramped up to 11, and set into a highly stylised universe that runs purely off rule-of-cool philosophy.

Everything about the universe is exaggerated to the point of ridicule, but yet it's played 100% straight and given this permanent gritty filter through which everything is interpreted. The whole thing is kind of a self-referential joke, and yet intrinsic to that story is the idea of a neverending war, of people being trapped between space horrors and their own genocidal government, a universe where a not only your body is at risk from a gruesome death, but your soul from an eternity of torment if you gain the attention of the wrong people.

There's a tragic seriousness and depth of grey/grey morality, hope in hopeless circumstances, people having to deal with inevitable annihilation, that runs underneath the fun, campy WAAARGing and space-elves. It's the constant integration and interaction of this over the top ridiculous universe played for laughs and the more base exploration of helplessness and vulnerability in a hostile, hopeless universe.
Basically it's Scrubs with giant mechs.


Oh, I also forgot that I love reading the fanon that gets created as people try and justify the crunch gamerules of the tabletop game and make them consistent with the lore, which leads to the decision that Creed is some sort of military genius that can hide 300 foot titan walkers behind a small bush: http://1d4chan.org/wiki/Creed or their decision that the chaoticly evil and insane "Kharne the Betrayer" was actually a really nice guy: http://1d4chan.org/wiki/Kharn
 

daveman247

New member
Jan 20, 2012
1,366
0
0
At the basis, the story/ universe was made to justify a tabletop game. It doesnt matter which faction fights or who wins because everybody fights, all of the time. Even amongst themselves.

Im not a fan of the tabletop game really apart from space hulk (the main game is too complicated and expensive for my liking) But i DO really like the universe. For the reasons you listed as your dislikes no less :p Few universes can compare to the brutal and COMPLETELEY over the top-ness of warhammer 40K. What can i say, i enjoy dystopian sci-fi.

And the fact there are no real good guys/ bad guys - everybody is just as bad as eachother: is what makes it interesting too - also makes it easier to choose a faction to buy if thats your thing.

If you read into a little bit there is a commentary on things such as religious extremism, xenophobia and maybe communism as well.

I enjoyed the space marine game very much ^_^

Its cool if you dont like it ^_^
 

Emiscary

New member
Sep 7, 2008
990
0
0
It's one of very few settings that completely avoids saccharine bullshit.

No, you are not special.

No, true love does not exist.

No, the puppy didn't get away in the end.

No, it isn't all going to be okay.

THERE IS ONLY WAR.
 

Zantos

New member
Jan 5, 2011
3,653
0
0
Hero in a half shell said:
Everything about the universe is exaggerated to the point of ridicule, but yet it's played 100% straight and given this permanent gritty filter through which everything is interpreted. The whole thing is kind of a self-referential joke, and yet intrinsic to that story is the idea of a neverending war, of people being trapped between space horrors and their own genocidal government, a universe where a not only your body is at risk from a gruesome death, but your soul from an eternity of torment if you gain the attention of the wrong people.
I dunno, I wouldn't say that. They play it 99% straight, which make the ridiculous jokes and references in the extra 1% that much better. It took me a while to realise that, but I saw the Dark Heresy chapter 'We're on a mission from the God-Emperor' and couldn't help but laugh. It could only be better if the next section was called 'No ma'am, we're Inquisitors'. Even the total straight faced stuff has some pretty funny moments, you put some ex-ultramarines in the eye of terror and suddenly everyone's a chaos corrupted comedian.
 

Xan Krieger

Completely insane
Feb 11, 2009
2,918
0
0
I view it as Star Wars turned up a few thousand notches. In Star Wars planets are destroyed rarely, in W40K it happens every day. Imperial Stormtroopers are ordinary human beings, Imperial Space Marines spit acid and eat brains. At-Ats are tiny compared to the bigger titans. It's as if the creator of W40K looked at Star Wars and said anything it could do W40K could do on a grander scale.

Also it helps that I <3 science fiction.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
To me at least, the appeal comes from the sheer variety of stories that can be told in the universe. while there is the overarching theme of five minutes to midnight doom and apocalypse, the universe actively encourages fans to create their own scenarios.

As long as certain tenets are followed (Emperor on the Throne, Male only Spess Mahreens, etc), almost any story in any context can be told and be just as valid as something put out by Black Library.

If you want heroic Space Marines nobly defending a planet of humans from an onslaught of Orks, and not have the planet executed for seeing Xenos immediately after by the Inquisition, then by all means, go ahead.

The setting and story merely provide the canvas upon which the players can create their own work.

It also helps if you don't take things seriously. A little fun never hurt anyone, and the writers know this. for example, did you know that psycannon ammunition (Warp infused bullets used by the Grey Knights) is supposedly derived from metabolic excess from the Emperor's Golden Throne?

Psycannon Bolts are Emperor Poop.
 

teqrevisited

New member
Mar 17, 2010
2,343
0
0
I thought it being over the top was part of the appeal. War machines the size of planets and giant power-armoured space badasses kicking the ever-living shit out of anything that isn't the same as them. Orkz running on the principles that if it's shooty enough and is either red or green then it will work at least once in a dozen attempts before it explodes in a rain of shrapnel.

It is ridiculously serious with its ridiculousness.