(Warning: Heavy) Thoughts on humanity

Recommended Videos

Rainforce

New member
Apr 20, 2009
692
0
0
Coffeejack said:
I found this repeating slideshow of pictures from the Battle for Stalingrad. I felt the hope beginning to dissipate from me just watching it.

It got me thinking: In countless bloody battles like Stalingrad that have occurred throughout the centuries, fully grown humans have been reduced to their very worst qualities. They have allowed confrontations to transform them into twisted, brutal parodies of their former selves. Conflicts boil over borders like an all-consuming plague as these savage butchers systematically destroy everything in sight fighting over land. Earth. The only home they've ever known in their lives. And at the end of it all, those who survived have forgotten who they were.

I could probably poke my head out the fucking window right now and hear someone getting into a fistfight over something utterly inconsequential. And this isn't even Glasgow. The vicious cycles of xenophobia, ignorance and violence don't seem to want to end.

I cannot stand the idea of this race reaching other planets and civilizations in its current condition. What would they bring, what could they bring to other races besides their own poisonous, lethal dogmas? Their diseases? Slavery? The same mistakes of their past would be repeated ad nauseum, on an increasingly large scale.

During my time here I have started thinking that the most noble act the human race could commit would be to end itself entirely. It would be an act of selflessness and mercy to anyone else out there in the cosmos. Otherwise, since starvation and disease don't seem to be killing enough of the population, war will probably pick up the slack. Again and again.

Anyway, I might as well ask people what they think. Do you find yourselves feeling this way? Ever snapped and wanted to "kill all humans", as the saying goes?

-----

TL:DR version for the bone-idle: The human race - Do we need it?
Some will care, some will...NOT.
you can also think about how stable we can keep this society if too many people cared too much.
point in case: welcome to the nightmare that is reality and the conflict between what we CAN do and what we want to do, based on our ideals or what we think is "right".

Also I will probably kill all humans, given the chance. But killing only a few seems hardly fair, so I won't do anything for the time being.
Also I recommend you not to think about it too much, the more you know the more you will just become some twisted rambling monster who lost all perspective, and will instead just follow its eternal hate for everything.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,855
15
43
flarty said:
Most obtuse comment I've seen in a good while.
I still stand by the fact that this misanthropic bullshit is generally the worst kind of starchild[footnote/]from the original ending of mass effect 3[/footnote] logic
 

MeChaNiZ3D

New member
Aug 30, 2011
3,102
0
0
Nobody and nothing needs humanity. But we are, just because, same as every animal. And we form little groups based on our ideals, whether we adopt the ideals of the group or have our own agenda. And we fight, to protect or to proliferate our own visions because we think we know what's best for everyone else, and other people think they know what's best for us. But the society that I live in isn't in conflict. I don't get to defend myself because I'm not under attack. All I feel I need to do is live my life the way I'd like to, and exemplify my own values, and hope that they bleed in. Generally speaking, I think everyone does what they think is right to the extent of their agency. Which is why there will always be conflict, because people who know what is right but that see wrong all around them can't help but try to fix it. I don't like censorship, I don't like racism, I don't like homophobia, I don't like people walking 4 abreast along a footpath meant for a stream each way, and to the extent that I'm able, I try to enforce what I think is right. There are people who think homosexuals are a perversion, black people are lesser, censorship is necessary and them being able to talk across one another is more important than me having to walk in the other direction. And to be honest, I don't think much of those who don't say what they think, because they're happy to let the world go in its own direction without them. Lack of conflict means no dialogue, no alternatives. Everyone agrees to abide by one set of rules regardless of whether or not they think they're right. And that'll always be the case because you can't just up and move to any culture, any country, at any time, and even if you could there's unlikely to be one perfect for you. You might think I'm seeing difference of opinion as synonymous with war, and I sort of am, because I don't even...imma have a shower...

[small]That was such BS...[/small]

tl;dr: There'll always be conflict, we just need to be sensible about it and not go killing one another. :D And whether or not there's a point to humanity is outside the question, because it doesn't matter.
 

knight steel

New member
Jul 6, 2009
1,793
0
0
Vault101 said:
flarty said:
Most obtuse comment I've seen in a good while.
I still stand by the fact that this misanthropic bullshit is generally the worst kind of starchild[footnote/]from the original ending of mass effect 3[/footnote] logic
You know being a royal dick towards him is not helping, in fact your just making things worse by proving his point-if you want him to see things differently kicking him while he's feeling down not going to do much.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,855
15
43
knight steel said:
Vault101 said:
flarty said:
Most obtuse comment I've seen in a good while.
I still stand by the fact that this misanthropic bullshit is generally the worst kind of starchild[footnote/]from the original ending of mass effect 3[/footnote] logic
You know being a royal dick towards him is not helping, in fact your just making things worse by proving his point-if you want him to see things differently kicking him while he's feeling down not going to do much.
mabye I'm being a little agressive but I see this kind of crap enough its just......annoying
 

knight steel

New member
Jul 6, 2009
1,793
0
0
Vault101 said:
knight steel said:
Vault101 said:
flarty said:
Most obtuse comment I've seen in a good while.
I still stand by the fact that this misanthropic bullshit is generally the worst kind of starchild[footnote/]from the original ending of mass effect 3[/footnote] logic
You know being a royal dick towards him is not helping, in fact your just making things worse by proving his point-if you want him to see things differently kicking him while he's feeling down not going to do much.
mabye I'm being a little agressive but I see this kind of crap enough its just......annoying
I know it is but getting worked up about it is bad for everybody involved, so when you see something like this you should ignore it and look at stuff that make you happy ^_^.
Everybody has periods were they go through a tough patch/feel down and have to vent it's how we cope, sure it can come across as whiny and stupid but haven't we all at some point?
Best thing to do is cheer the person up, not bring them down.
 

M0rp43vs

Most Refined Escapist
Jul 4, 2008
2,249
0
0
If you wish for all humans to kill themselves, by all means, why don't you be the first. If that sounds harsh, sorry but imagine me saying this inquisitively.

I'm actually surprised with the response of this thread because the last one like it a while back, everyone would agree with Op. As such I find myself echoing statements of most people here.

We are not perfect, as is every species on this planet and possibly this universe. But the funny thing about humans is that they are capable of the vilest of evil and at the same time the greatest of good. Sometimes the same individual is involved.

Humanity sometimes has to do what it can to survive because it's not like nature is going to be kind to us if we don't. We have to balance our ideals with increasing our chances of survival. Is it fair? No, not really. But name me one thing that can unanimously be considered fair in this universe.

As for my thoughts on humanity? Well I can pretty much sum it up in two words:Mostly Harmless
 

Calibanbutcher

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2009
1,701
8
43
flarty said:
Vault101 said:
Unfortunately there will always be bad people. But there has been some great people too. I think the best example would be Malcolm X who started life as a thug, joined the nation of Islam which was a predominantly racist organization towards whites. Then later left went on pilgrimage and after witnessing the diversity of people in the Muslim faith, began preaching a message of peace and equality. Which i believe demonstrates we are all capable of good and bad. It just depends on your life experiences and your baggage i guess.

Vault101 said:
Waaahhh human beings are mean and I think the killing of innocent humans is ok because humans cause suffering to other humans because starchild logic!

Your not edgy
Your nit the only one
And you sure as fuck are not deep

Now get the fuck over it, go do something to make life better for someone else if you really care that much...oh you don't? Yeah fount think so, people like you just want to pretend they are some deep thinking super villain who truly gets the world
Most obtuse comment I've seen in a good while.

Gotta disagree with you on one thing:
Best example would have to be Nelson Mandela.
He was imprisoned for quite some time, got out, got elected president and was "clothed in immense power" and he chose not to take revenge on his oppressors but rather to forgive them.
That I would argue is one of the greatest achievements of the last century.
 

Eddie the head

New member
Feb 22, 2012
2,324
0
0
I could tell a lot about what was going to be said in the OP by "(Warning: Heavy.)" Wishing no offence but this isn't new.
 

Angie7F

WiseGurl
Nov 11, 2011
1,703
0
0
It is a stage we all go through.
But we learn to just suck it up and go on living.
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,525
0
0
How refreshing, misanthropy on the internet ¬_¬

Focus on the bad and that's all you'll see, but humanity has progressed a ridiculous amount in the last 100 years.

With the information age, people are becoming less ignorant of the world around them, we talk to people from all around the world, learn about different cultures, religions, politics.

It's getting harder and harder to convince the common man that killing another person on the opposite side of the globe is 'right' because they are 'different'.

Our nations have borders, but our shared knowledge of eachother is no longer limited by what governments want us to see.

It's difficult to kill a man who lives on the opposite side of the world when you were just talking to someone like him. I love the internet.
 

flarty

New member
Apr 26, 2012
632
0
0
knight steel said:
Vault101 said:
knight steel said:
Vault101 said:
flarty said:
Most obtuse comment I've seen in a good while.
I still stand by the fact that this misanthropic bullshit is generally the worst kind of starchild[footnote/]from the original ending of mass effect 3[/footnote] logic
You know being a royal dick towards him is not helping, in fact your just making things worse by proving his point-if you want him to see things differently kicking him while he's feeling down not going to do much.
mabye I'm being a little agressive but I see this kind of crap enough its just......annoying
I know it is but getting worked up about it is bad for everybody involved, so when you see something like this you should ignore it and look at stuff that make you happy ^_^.
Everybody has periods were they go through a tough patch/feel down and have to vent it's how we cope, sure it can come across as whiny and stupid but haven't we all at some point?
Best thing to do is cheer the person up, not bring them down.
Took the words right out of my mouth. Bravo *gentleman clap

Calibanbutcher said:
Gotta disagree with you on one thing:
Best example would have to be Nelson Mandela.
He was imprisoned for quite some time, got out, got elected president and was "clothed in immense power" and he chose not to take revenge on his oppressors but rather to forgive them.
That I would argue is one of the greatest achievements of the last century.
While i agree that Nelson Mandela is great example of what greatness people can achieve. But i was trying to make the point that everyone is capable of being good or bad. I can see i might not of been very clear.
 

crimsoncheesecake

New member
Mar 13, 2012
16
0
0
Tendencies in humans that we find despicable are inherent in many, if not nearly all, species on earth:

-The camel spider male relies on rape for guaranteed reproduction "Upon location of a prospective mate, males use their pedipalps to coerce the female into a ?frozen state? or torpor. This may be a chemoresponse by the female, but the same response has been elicited solely by mechanical handling (Heymons 1902, Junqua 1966)"(http://www.solpugid.com/Courtship%20and%20Mating.htm)

-Certain wasps lay their eggs in spiders or larvae (depending on which wasp species) so that they can then grow inside, eating their host from the inside and in many cases control it mentally, so humans are not the only species prone to enslave others (just google it and you'll even find videos on the process)

-Chimpanzees can commit heinous acts of violence in territorial disputes much like human wars (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7XuXi3mqYM)

-Dolphins are known to commit random acts of violence, in many cases killing, against porpoises for no apparent reason other than meer frustration or quite possibly just for fun (again just google it, there are several texts to read on this e.g. "http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21028154.700-californian-dolphin-gang-caught-killing-porpoises.html")

I could go on, stating for example cases of the brutal violence arising between males and females during the mating periods for many species, the immense stress and anxiety every hunted prey goes through before it is brutally killed. Life as we know it has been shaped by natural-selection, and being good at violence is especially favored in this process as it allows not only species to defend themselves, but to eliminate competing species and for individuals within the species to subdue/kill mating rivals and subdue their mating partner to guarantee successful reproduction. In short to say that humans are the morally worse species on this planet is an extremely unfounded statement as many (if not all) of our negative traits can be found on a vast number of other species sharing our earth.

In fact I believe humans are the greatest hope there is for life as we have the greatest potential to reduce suffering not only for ourselves but for other species on the long term. We are the first species to recognize moral issues and rationally shape our society accordingly, instituting laws that suppress violence and reduce suffering and we have the technology or at least the technological potential to enforce these laws and improve our overall welfare. Not only that but we also have the ability to go beyond this earth and bring life to whole new worlds. I am not one to deny our flaws but needless to say we have improved as a species considerably over just the last few decades. Sure we may have had ups and downs, like two world wars, but these have in fact served to strenghten the modern human's strive for peace. For every heinous act of evil there has also been at least one noble act of good. I am in fact proud to say that I am human and I believe that we have true greatness awaiting us as a species for centuries to come.
 

Loonyyy

New member
Jul 10, 2009
1,290
0
0
OhJohnNo said:
Loonyyy said:
And OhJohnNo? That's not what the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics means. It means that for any irreversible thermodynamic reaction, there is a net increase in entropy. That's got nothing to do with "Chaos" or "Evil", it means that the "quality" of the energy is reduced. Leave the engineering to the engineers, and keep it out of the pseudo-philosophy please, we're still copping flack from the last time some idiot misapplied it and said that it disproved evolution.
Fffahahaha someone seriously tried to use it to disprove evolution?

Ahh I dunno why I'm surprised, on reflection I'm pretty sure I've seen it on FSTDT somewhere.

Anyway, correct me if I'm wrong but is not the 2nd law of thermodynamics the reason, at heart, that most living things need to consume other living things to survive?
Yeah, someone said that because evolution results in greater order, and less chaos, that the second law was violated. Said person was an engineer, and brought much shame to the profession I'm working towards. Naturally, just looking at an acorn violates his idea: If energy means increased entropy, with no exceptions, then the acorn should burn, and become a uniform pile of carbon. Instead, it grows into a tree. There are things called reservoirs in thermodynamics, and you can have an decrease in entropy in one part of the system, and an increase elsewhere. This is vital to refrigeration and air conditioning systems, which usually use the outside environment as a reservoir. He missed the part that says "Closed System", and didn't seem aware of thermal reservoirs. Said engineer probably was incapable of understanding refrigeration or air conditioners.

But actually, the second law has nothing to do with living things needing to consume things. That's a biological process. To do things, things need energy. Plants absorb light, and photosynthesise. Animals eat plants, and each other, and break down the chemical bonds, which is then used to "fuel" the body. Much like how an internal combustion engine needs fuel, which it burns, breaking the bonds and releasing energy in an expansion, which gives off heat. Without energy, the car will not go, and the person will not walk, talk, or anything else.

The second law actually refers to the condition of energy. Energy tends towards entropy, a state of disorder, of a sort. The end result of entropy, is that the sum of irreversible processes (All thermodynamic processes contain irreversible elements, but many have so little we call them "Ideal") will result in the universe being a uniform area, of broken down matter, and roughly uniform temperature. This is what we call the "Heat Death of the Universe" (I'm simplifying massively of course, but as an engineering student, that's how we roll). Some people misunderstand entropy, and think of it by the colloquial use of the word, and take it to mean chaos, and then use the misunderstanding of chaos to think violence and disorder, which has spread the notion that thermodynamics says that life is chaos, and the like, which is incorrect. The Laws of thermodynamics essentially describe how thermodynamic processes take place.

To quote wikipedia:
Zeroth law of thermodynamics: If two systems are each in thermal equilibrium with a third, they are also in thermal equilibrium with each other.

Basically, the basis for temperature. And, from this follows the notion that energy, in the form of heat, transfers from points of high energy, or temperature, to lower ones, until they reach equilibrium.

First law of thermodynamics: The increase in internal energy of a closed system is equal to the difference of the heat supplied to the system and the work done by it: ΔU = Q - W

Basically, the law of conservation of energy. In all thermodynamic processes, there is no net change in the heat content of the universe. The change in the internal energy of a system is equal to the heat absorbed by the system, minus the work done by the system.

Second law of thermodynamics: Heat cannot spontaneously flow from a colder location to a hotter location.

Weird wording, but basically, hot flows to cold, and not backwards. You can't make heat flow from a cold area to a hot area without the use of a thermal reservoir.

Third law of thermodynamics: As a system approaches absolute zero the entropy of the system approaches a minimum value.

Colder things have a lower entropy than hotter things.

Thermodynamics actually has pretty much nothing to do with what most people think it does, and I keep seeing it crop up in the wrong places. It's nothing more than the description of how energy transfers. Sorry that I came off as aggressive in my response, it's just a bug bear of mine, I've seen it often enough, and it's one of those things that's rarely understood in the context, and the usual phrasing of the laws doesn't help. It's like how many people will cite Newton's Third Law "For every action in nature, there is one both equal and opposite" to mean that every action has consequences, often when talking about politics and the like, which actually has nothing to do with it, all it means is that if I push on someone, their body exerts the same force on my hand, or if I fire a gun, the force which propels the bullet also pushes my arm back.

And that has been our physics lesson for today.
 

Loonyyy

New member
Jul 10, 2009
1,290
0
0
SimpleThunda said:
Animals don't do "shitty" things. They do what they must to survive.

Humans, on the other hand, don't really have an excuse for all the "shitty" stuff they do, besides the fact that, perhaps, humans have just become shittier and shittier over the ages. The conditions in which we live have become better and better, yet humans remain to be shitty. Perhaps shittyness is in our nature.
As crimson cheesecake points out: This is simply not true. Have you seen a cat play with it's food? Heard of dolphins drowning porpoises? Lions killing the cubs of other males? The animal kingdom is a brutal place, and not everything there is necessary for survival, and even the things that are, would be considered obscene by humans. The idea that animals are just instinct and just do what is necessary, and are thus, justified, is a poor application of the naturalistic fallacy, with invalid premises.
 

Epic Bear Man

New member
Feb 5, 2013
178
0
0
Humans are just another species; we have our moments of evil, and our moments of good. I'd like to show you something from World War I; one of the most horrific wars in our history. On Christmas, 1914, the French, Germans, and British all agreed to a truce so the soldiers could celebrate the holiday. What once were enemies gave greetings to one another, gave souvenirs to one another. They sang songs of celebration in their native tongues to their enemies, and they even ventured into "no man's land" to meet up with one another. All for one night, so all of the soldiers could celebrate it, so that even if it was their final day, at least they would've had a blast the previous night.

And we're talking about during a war that brought about chemical warfare.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_truce
 

geK0

New member
Jun 24, 2011
1,843
0
0
Some humans have violent tendencies, especially under extreme circumstances such as war; therefore, KILL THE ENTIRE RACE INDISCRIMINATELY!

yep, seems rational

it's like, children's TV show villain caliber logic.
 

Padwolf

New member
Sep 2, 2010
2,060
0
0
Well, way to generalise and ignore all the good things humanity has done. Humans can be bad, humans can be good. They aren't all the same. Some have violent tendencies, others tend to want peace. Focus on the bad like you are doing and that is all you are ever going to see and you will have no one to blame but yourself. Try opening up a little bit, try going outside really looking at the good things that are around you. There are some wonderful sights to see out there.
 

Aerodyamic

New member
Aug 14, 2009
1,205
0
0
OhJohnNo said:
axlryder said:
Wow this is melodramatic. Yeah, humans can be shitty. Get over it. You know what else can be shitty? Other animals. They do some really shitty stuff by human standards. Do you think a bunch of species should off themselves because they don't meet your own subjective moral standards of what's "good"?
This, in itself, is a depressing thing. It seems to me that due to the very nature of the universe itself (with its 2nd law of thermodynamics), life is just naturally evil/immoral. Pure selfishness is the order of the day pretty much everywhere, and it seems like the more intelligent a species gets, the worse they get (see: dolphins, chimpanzees, us).

I'm not gonna say we should just wipe everything out, though. That seems like the lazy solution to me. Ideally we'll eventually reach the point where we're able to change nature for the better, but that probably won't be for centuries at least.
Chimpanzee troupes are actually pretty well-behaved; much of the scuffling to establish the pecking order within one is about threat displays, and very rarely involves actually combat, as I understand it, and the troupes seem to be matriachal, if I remember correctly.

It's the Bonobos you have to watch out for; they'll just get up and organize a raiding party into another troupes' territory, and they have some basic tool-use skills that they take to war with them, using rocks and sticks to beat their targets. Scary enough, during these "wars", they rape, kill, mutilate and eat their "enemies".

Sounds a little like Wall Street, to me.
 

Terminal Blue

Elite Member
Legacy
Feb 18, 2010
3,933
1,804
118
Country
United Kingdom
Aerodyamic said:
Chimpanzee troupes are actually pretty well-behaved; much of the scuffling to establish the pecking order within one is about threat displays, and very rarely involves actually combat, as I understand it, and the troupes seem to be matriachal, if I remember correctly.

It's the Bonobos you have to watch out for; they'll just get up and organize a raiding party into another troupes' territory, and they have some basic tool-use skills that they take to war with them, using rocks and sticks to beat their targets. Scary enough, during these "wars", they rape, kill, mutilate and eat their "enemies".
Wrong way round.

Bonobo society is not completely without violence, but it's far less violent than Chimpanzee society. The typical bonobo response to tension is to have sex with each other (homosexual and heterosexual) in order to re-cement their social bonds. Indeed, bonobos are one of the very few animals besides humans who seem to use sex for purely social reasons. Bonobos have never been observed to kill each other, even when they do fight.

Chimpanzees on the other hand are extremely territorial and much more aggressive, and have certainly been observed to kill each other (and occasionally humans) over territory. You're right in that they prefer aggressive displays over fighting, particularly to settle scores between members of the same group but against other groups it tends to be pretty no-holds-barred. There is a debate about whether this is actually natural behavior, but it seems unlikely that it isn't.

Chimpanzee society is extremely male dominated. Males are both stronger and more social than females. Although bonobos males still tend to be stronger, females are much more social with each other and thus seem to have a much more active role in society, hence why they've generally been thought of as matriarchal.