I don't know, everyone else seems to do fine with broken, buggy games....gigastar said:Of course this is to be the case. How else are they going to biuld a franchise off the back of a game if it launches with more bugs than New Vegas?
I suspect they've known this for a while now. I seriously doubt they could get the game out within this timeframe.CriticalMiss said:I'm suprised that the game is being delayed so close to release, surely they would have needed more than that to get the game printed on to DVDs and distributed? But at least they know when it is best to delay a game and release it when it is done rather than rush it out and fix the bugs post-launch.
I wonder which would be worse though. If they delayed an anticipated launch title, or if it was buggy as shit.Kwil said:Wow. Ubisoft is really in the "screw-over the console makers" mode lately, aren't they? First Nintendo with their "No DLC for Wii U" and now Microsoft and Sony with a "No hyped launch title for you guys, hope that doesn't screw with your marketing plans too much."
Not doing themselves a lot of favors for any future dealings with console makers are they?
I would think making it work would be sufficient.Coreless said:Guess GTAV really was more then Ubisoft bargained for, I suspect they are delaying it so they can add in a bunch of features that they hope can compete with something like GTA's online component.
Not sure, EA gave BioWare a year for Dragon Age: Inquisition and they aren't pushing DICE too hard for Mirror's Edge 2. Now if it was a year ago I would have agreed.Sheo_Dagana said:There goes my only real motivation to bother with any of the day-one business to get a PS4.
I'm pretty disappointed there's a delay, but if that's what it takes then I'm glad Ubisoft gave them more time. God knows EA would have told them to just go ahead.
This is Ubisoft we're talking about,the company that delayed Rayman Legends on Wii U like 2 weeks before it was due to launchAndy Shandy said:It's odd that it is so close to the release date that they've decided to delay it
I think it'as the vocal minority. I know enough people who loved AssCreed 3.Get_A_Grip_ said:That was my first thought, but Assassins Creed 3 left a bad taste in a lot of peoples mouths. Especially after that ending. But like most cases on the internet that could just be the vocal minority giving me that impression.SkarKrow said:Sadly I think it would likely be the other way round, with Assassins Creed IV cannibalising the sales for Watch Dogs. Which would be very sad indeed, and would suck for Ubisoft.Get_A_Grip_ said:Well it is nice to see that they're not rushing the game out with the aim of making a more polished experience.
But, I do expect that Ubisoft also don't want Watch_Dogs_ competing with Assassins Creed IV for holiday season sales. Given the choice I think most people would choose WD over AC IV.
Overall it hopefully leads to a better final product. It does mean for those who play on consoles that there's one less reason to upgrade though.