Hmmm? Which makes this an interesting question. Interviews are typically considered Slander. But this was a written interview where he wrote out responses to questions. This of course having no bearing on whether or not Moore is a batshit crazy asshole. It would just be an interesting legal question.thebobmaster said:I know. For some reason, I was thinking that this was a written transcription of a verbal interview, hence the confusion. So, it would be libel in this case.Reed Spacer said:It's libel if it's wrtten, it's slander if it's spoken.thebobmaster said:No, they are going to try to sue Moore because he's spreading lies (at least, according to the lawsuit). That is legally libel. I think. Would this be slander or libel?RaikuFA said:Wait, are they seriously gonna try and sue Moore because he told some people off?
That's fucking low.
Either way, it's not "because he told some people off". Imagine if someone went around saying that Roger Ebert gave their movie two stars instead of three because they didn't pay him off as he requested. That's about the same level as Moore's accusation that the reviewer broke confidentiality when said reviewer, according to them, had permission.
"Slander is spoken. In print, it's libel."-J. Jonah Jameson