Decoy Doctorpus said:
theultimateend said:
Decoy Doctorpus said:
theultimateend said:
Maet said:
I will watch (and gleefully review) the movie, but I have absolutely zero interest in the source material.
Fine review. I'm tempted to say it's too short, but I'm not one for writing long reviews myself. Really quick read with a good chunk of information. Good stuff.
The Watchmen is one of the best Graphic novels I've ever read.
Likewise Rorschach is one of my top 3 favorite characters.
1) Joker
2) Rorschach
3) Captain America
I know...talk about a change in seriousness from top to bottom

.
Oh no. Judging by your avatar you've gone for Douchebag post movie, 100 bullets bullshit Joker. Azarello's take on the character was horrible.
I'm looking forward to the Watchmen movie but, in contrast to your average Watchmen fan, I think they should change the ending. In my ending Rorschach beats Ozymandias to death with a coffee table.
I've read every graphic novel that has ever included the Joker. (and many comic arcs for that matter)
So I'd practice your judgment skills. Especially since you've already failed with the line "X has a horrible take on him." Short of a few things you can't do the Joker wrong, he changes who he is with every day according to the world around him.
A flimsy excuse for bad writing. Azarello has a talent for hilariously over the top Macho dialogue (usually with homoerotic undertones) and it's served him well in 100 bullets but when he tries the same shtick on the Joker it just strips all the subtlety from the character. He did the same with John Constantine when he took over Hellblazer as well, turning a deeply threatening character into an obvious 'bad ass'.
A flimsy excuse made by DC comics years before this graphic novel existed...
Anyways, every single novel I've ever read about the Joker has been dramatically different. Which makes sense. Much like Lincoln each new examination of the character reveals a new outlook on the character (Yes I mean Abraham Lincoln...).
Considering the Joker crippled batgirl, killed the second robin, killed batman dozens (or hundreds) of times over and over when he had the ability to control reality, and considering he's got the highest murder toll of ANY character in Batman...I don't see where this 'subtelty' comes in.