insectoid said:Been there...The guy who watches five hours of television a day will look at the woman who plays five hours of videogames a day and conclude she's "addicted."
I really can't say I agree with anything you've said in this thread so far, obviously you like games yet it seems you'd rather keep people young and old alike alienated than to have them encroach on your sacred passtime. In the long term games wouldn't survive as an entertainment medium without attracting new people, especially children (see Mario, the Wii etc.). I'd assume someone who enjoys games would want people of all walks of life to have the chance to experience and enjoy them but part of me thinks you're the sort of person who'd like the idea of being some sort of 'dying breed' of hardcore gamers.Abedeus said:Well, kids care about games. They don't care about gaming. I mean, for them it's just another form of killing the time.
Oldies have nothing better to do. Church, talking about dead/dying/sick relatives and TV. Most of them won't live long enough to see what will become of gaming. They honestly won't care.
You might as well try to make people care about the enviornment.
He's the sort of man who has his own, terribly sunken chair in front of the TVThe guy who watches five hours of television a day will look at the woman who plays five hours of videogames a day and conclude she's "addicted."
What is that difference?the antithesis said:I do not think we need more gamers. There are already too many of those. All we really need are more people who play games. There is a difference.
Well, yea that's true, but what the creation of more casual gamers does is educate the uneducated about games on a level the can relate to and understand.matsugawa said:What is that difference?the antithesis said:I do not think we need more gamers. There are already too many of those. All we really need are more people who play games. There is a difference.
Do you mean Gamers to mean 'hardcore' and People Who Play Games to mean 'casual'? If that's the case, I'd have to disagree; casual gamers only make games popular, not better. In light of these video-game related controversies, having more casual gamers is not going to change public opinion. Rock music and horror movies popular and mainstream, but each has earned its own share of controversy in spite of that.
I have been saying this......for SO LONG.This is because people are jerks. Nothing short of extinction will cure this.
It seems like someone completely missed the point of the intro.Crash486 said:As thought out as your argument might be, it seems to me the first few opening statements of your article put me off. You come off a little bit as anti-social, whether you're intending to be ironic or not, but the way you present the article it appears you sit on the opposite side of the spectrum. If I weren't a gamer, or even say a "gameophobe" I think I'd probably write you off as another one of those crazy gamers I have nothing in common with and therefore wouldn't associate with.
You can't dismiss everyone else's interest in wake of your own, especially when you're trying to change their opinion about the matter. Other than that though, very nicely written, I enjoyed your article thouroughly.
Shamus Young has been talking about getting new gamers for quite some times so I don't think he saw ZP and said "hey, I could do that". And if your reference for intelligent discussion is ZP and MovieBob..... they are entertaining but come on! Yathzee says, half-jokingly, "fuck sequels" and you 200 posts of ZP fanboys saying "fuck sequels too" with about 2 or 3 guys trying to have an intelligent discussion. At least we have somewhat of a good debate going on here.KhakiHat said:Also, quit using the cave story. It?s full of loop holes and presuppositions. Try something original and airtight. That?s what Yahtizee and Movie Bob do.
I've always sworn to whoever's in control of the great scheme of things that if I ever become famous, I will stress that gaming got me where I am today.Rodger said:I agree entirely. And you know what would be a good start? If some adventurous gamer got into politics or entrepreneurship, so there's higher ups 'in the know'. So there's someone on the senate, in the house of commons, someone that can stand up and say "I am a gamer, and I do not approve of this condescending!"
The fact that a gamer even got into such a position, making such a fact known, would cause people to stand back and think: if all that bad stuff they heard about gaming was true, could a gamer really get into politics?
Or we could...well...give out free Wii's and DS's. Lets give Jack Thompson a Wii and Wii Sports. I'm sure he has plenty of time on his hands these days, when he isn't busy trying to pass bills and get people to pay attention to him.
RougeWaveform said:I agree except for the bit about Rock'n'Roll.. It totally turned kids into deviants.. I mean have you talked to anyone born in the 70's or 80's? No, since they can only communicate in grunts and/or grones. Especially to their loving parents who only want the best of them.
But at least, they not evil like people born in the 40's, 50's, and 60's.