WET

Recommended Videos

Phoenix Arrow

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,377
0
0
Right then. There's a bit of a contradiction in video game reviews these days. I mean, you get the ones at the major companies that can have their opinion bought and then there are the amateur ones which, lets face it, are amateurs for a reason. They go into reviewing a game with the direct intention of hating it. They don't try to have fun, they make up their mind about a game before they've even got their hands on it. Then you read the finished article and it's a hate filled rant singing phrases that Yahtzee Croshaw may have said in passing about a pervious game like a good canary, only with all the humour, originality and truth drain from it. So I thought maybe it was time for someone who's always looking for a game to love to review this game.

You play Rubi, a standard tough girl who lives in a scrapyard somewhere in Texas and seems to make money by "taking care" of situations. The story is about two feud between two drug rival drug dealers. The evil drug dealer tries to steal a heart that's about to be transplanted into the good drug dealer and Rubi has been employed to steal it back. The evil drug dealer then poses as the good drug dealer and pays Rubi to bring him the good drug dealers son in a fatherly way. When she does this, the evil drug dealer reveals himself, frames Rubi and kills his son. So now the whole drug dealing world hates Rubi as she tried to exact revenge.

Let me start by saying this is not a perfect game. Not by a long way. There are so many little things that just make me think "what is the point?" For example, I remember a time when to walk through a door, you just had to go up to it and press A or X or M1. But no, Wet has you tap X until the door gives way. You don't have to tap it quickly at all, it just strikes me s a bit pointless. I mean, why not just press a button once and have Rubi walk up and force it open herself?

Then there are these enemies that... well, they're not bosses. They kind of breeze in with a minigun and you have to make them run away to regroup by wasting all your ammo on them. Then when they're on the movem you run up to them, tap X and you have to button tap your way through a mini cutscene. Again, what's the point? It seems silly to complain about something rather small, but it's just not needed. I do rather enjoy when she jums over an enemy in some of these moment and stabs them in the gut. She puts on a little devious smile which for some reason made me smile too.

With that out of the way, lets talk about the combat. You can kill people in one of two ways. Shoot them or slash them with your sword. Now, the devs have been banging the drum about this acrobatic fighting system which basically consists of shooting while either sliding down a ladders, sliding on your knees, diving around or wallrunning. As you do this, Rubi fires one gun at the body of some poor sod and you can aim her second gun with the analogue stick. You can aim wherever you fancy and she just bends herself to aim at that and whatever it was she decided to shoot at. You can run up and shoot people if you really want to, but it makes you easier to hit and you can only aim one gun so the rate of fire is less.

Every so often, a door locks behind up and you have to off a group of people while blocking the door that they run out of. To start with this is no big thing, but as you progress, it gets harder and you have to plan out your root and when you should kill, when you should pick up the regen boosty things and when you should block the doors. You know, I like that sort of thing. I like planning out where I'm going and that smug feeling you get when your plan comes together. Apart from these sequences, you basically have to infiltrate a building then navigate the corridors until you find where you're going. It's pretty linear but that's not a big deal really. It's nothing to shout about but it's not bad at all.

There's a bit of variation from that when sometime Rubi gets blood all over her face and goes into a rage. The art style changes to a cell shaded red, white and black and the awesome soundtrack comes into play as you run around, killing people while making your way to the exit. Don't take this lightly when I say, these sequences are the most fun I've had in quite some time. Maybe it was the art style and music clouding my judgement, but whatever it was, I loved it.

This is where I think the fury filled amateur reviewers are missing the point, This is what the games industry used to be about. Having fun. Frankly, I couldn't give two shits about a dramatic story and well thought out characters when I'm having fun. Sometimes it's the character that make a game fun like in Silent Hill 3 and sometimes it's the story. But sometimes it's just about pissing about with an arsenal of weapons, jumping around and hurting things. It reminds me of the old Prince of Persia games where the running and jumping slotted in with the combat but in this case, it's focussed on the combat more than the running and jumping. Since when did it become such a fashion to be so negative about video games? It's an industry built around the idea of purely having fun and I think that sentiment has been lost between the war games and the powered armour and the good triumphing against all the odds.

I'd recommend this games to anyone with the same mindset as I do, the people who want to have fun.
 

lostclause

New member
Mar 31, 2009
1,860
0
0
Nice review but you should probably talk a little about the plot first to set the scene. I know you said you don't care about it but as it is it's a little confusing.
 

Pyode

New member
Jul 1, 2009
567
0
0
So you're saying that, because you gave the game a good review, you must be the only person who went into this game with an objective mindset? Do you really believe that? That's a pretty bold statement.

I went into this game with every intention of liking it. It looked like it was going to be a nice little shoot'em up blood fest with interesting characters and cool moves. It had some of those qualities but I felt that the glitches, frustrating combat, and ridiculous use of quick time events just hampered the experience way too much. And you know what, that's my opinion and that doesn't mean that your opinion is wrong or biased... just different.
 

Phoenix Arrow

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,377
0
0
Thanks for the kind words. Didn't think about the plot when I wrote this, just edited in a quick synopsis.

Pyode said:
So you're saying that, because you gave the game a good review, you must be the only person who went into this game with an objective mindset? Do you really believe that? That's a pretty bold statement.
No. I'm not saying that at all. What I meant was when I read some of the reviews in this section, it seems that when anyone plays a... a game outside the general conventions, shall we say, they go into it with a negative mindset which tarnishes their review. I've noticed this attitude in amateur reviewers on this site and others when they're reviewing various games and I just bugs me. I'm not saying I'm divine and can cast a superior judgement of it, I just thought the time has come for someone to review a game from a more positive mindset. Maybe I was a bit too positive, but I can't really judge that myself.

As for your other points, I do agree. The QTE's are ridiculous, especially in some cases when they're a bit out of the blue. But they're not a major part of gameplay so I just sort of shrugged them off. As for the combat, I actually rather enjoyed it, but then I've always been a sucker for freerunning and the like.

I did look at your review by the way and I thought it was fair. But then I also read the first impressions review and thought that was ridiculously harsh. Oh, one thing you touched upon that I didn't, those "let's all go to the lobby shorts". The first one made me go "heh" but it got old fast. I see why they did though, to make the loading screens have more of a movie feel. But like I said, it got old.
 

Schmidtzkrieg

New member
Feb 25, 2009
116
0
0
I was pretty excited about this game before it came out, but the reviews left me wondering if it was worth playing. I was hoping that it's along the same lines as a 'Force Unleashed' or 'X-men Wolverine' type game, where you don't really care about the story or characters, it just fun to murder dudes (and dudettes too I guess). From the sounds of your review it seems to be excatly that kind of game. Also Eliza Dushku doing the VO is awesome, I'll probably end up picking this up. Good job, you came at it from the same mindset that I was.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
Schmidtzkrieg said:
I was pretty excited about this game before it came out, but the reviews left me wondering if it was worth playing. I was hoping that it's along the same lines as a 'Force Unleashed' or 'X-men Wolverine' type game, where you don't really care about the story or characters, it just fun to murder dudes (and dudettes too I guess). From the sounds of your review it seems to be excatly that kind of game. Also Eliza Dushku doing the VO is awesome, I'll probably end up picking this up. Good job, you came at it from the same mindset that I was.
One of The Force Unleashed's strongest points in all of it's reviews was the story...

And if the demo is anything to go by, the game's not worth a penny.

Other reviews are decidedly average, so obviously no ones tried to pay them off, which is a pretty weird thing to say by the way OP. It's hardly a common occurrence, and it's a bit insulting to the guys that do this for a living just being slapped with the label of sell-outs (i.e. saying they can't/won't do their job properly).
 

Pyode

New member
Jul 1, 2009
567
0
0
Phoenix Arrow said:
No. I'm not saying that at all. What I meant was when I read some of the reviews in this section, it seems that when anyone plays a... a game outside the general conventions, shall we say, they go into it with a negative mindset which tarnishes their review. I've noticed this attitude in amateur reviewers on this site and others when they're reviewing various games and I just bugs me. I'm not saying I'm divine and can cast a superior judgement of it, I just thought the time has come for someone to review a game from a more positive mindset. Maybe I was a bit too positive, but I can't really judge that myself.

As for your other points, I do agree. The QTE's are ridiculous, especially in some cases when they're a bit out of the blue. But they're not a major part of gameplay so I just sort of shrugged them off. As for the combat, I actually rather enjoyed it, but then I've always been a sucker for freerunning and the like.

I did look at your review by the way and I thought it was fair. But then I also read the first impressions review and thought that was ridiculously harsh. Oh, one thing you touched upon that I didn't, those "let's all go to the lobby shorts". The first one made me go "heh" but it got old fast. I see why they did though, to make the loading screens have more of a movie feel. But like I said, it got old.
Believe me, I see where your coming from. All I am saying is you should try not to be so general when making claims like that because it sounds like you are saying that everyone else but you is wrong.

Also, your use of the term "amateur reviewer" is kind of an offensive way to put it. The fact of the matter is that every one on this forum (including you) are amateur reviewers, so using "amateur" in such a derogatory way insults all of the reviewers on this forum. I'm sure you didn't mean it that way, but that is what it sounds like you are doing.

Other then that I think you did a good review, aside from the spoiler in the second paragraph.
 

Schmidtzkrieg

New member
Feb 25, 2009
116
0
0
Woodsey said:
Schmidtzkrieg said:
I was pretty excited about this game before it came out, but the reviews left me wondering if it was worth playing. I was hoping that it's along the same lines as a 'Force Unleashed' or 'X-men Wolverine' type game, where you don't really care about the story or characters, it just fun to murder dudes (and dudettes too I guess). From the sounds of your review it seems to be excatly that kind of game. Also Eliza Dushku doing the VO is awesome, I'll probably end up picking this up. Good job, you came at it from the same mindset that I was.
One of The Force Unleashed's strongest points in all of it's reviews was the story...

And if the demo is anything to go by, the game's not worth a penny.

Other reviews are decidedly average, so obviously no ones tried to pay them off, which is a pretty weird thing to say by the way OP. It's hardly a common occurrence, and it's a bit insulting to the guys that do this for a living just being slapped with the label of sell-outs (i.e. saying they can't/won't do their job properly).
I always found it strange that TFU's story was so highly rated. I just liked throwing stormtroopers around, dropping them down bottomless pits, ETC.

I will definately DL the WET demo when I can get my entertainment center hooked back up to the internet (I love renovating *sigh*). I really didn't expect this game to get good reviews, it looks a little overambitous and underfinished judging by gameplay vids.
 
May 28, 2009
3,698
0
0
Is there really such thing as a "good" drug dealer (except the drugs that make you better)?

Edit: Just to lend my own playing experience to it, I must say that I did play it looking to enjoy it, because first hearing about it I was intrigued. However, even though I know it was all about the action, I really didn't enjoy that aspect of it. I guess that kind of thing isn't for everyone. That's not to say I hate all the the parts of a game that just throw story out the window to let you have a bit of fun gunning down legions of bads - I think close combat cuts it more for me (I liked the sword much more than the guns).
 

SomethingUnrelated

New member
Aug 29, 2009
2,855
0
0
I pretty much agree with what your saying. WET isn't a groundbreaking game, not particularly revolutionary, and it isn't going to change the way games are made, but it's fun, and that's why I like it. Great review!
 

bushwhacker2k

New member
Jan 27, 2009
1,587
0
0
I think it became popular when people half-assed games to make lots of money. There are many crappy games made by idiots who had no idea what they were doing. I honestly find many games to be boring, and it is my knowledge of this that makes me cynical. I think it's reasonable, but I'm glad you're having fun.
 

Chechosaurus

New member
Jul 20, 2008
840
0
0
I played the demo and then pre-ordered it the same day and I shit you not... I have NEVER bought a game from brand new let alone pre-order one. This is partly because I am a bit of a cheapskate but also partly because I am poor and there are so many games I want. So the fact that I went out and not only bought it from new but pre-ordered it says a lot.

I really enjoyed it. The platforming was good, the soundtrack was sublime and the combat plenty fun. It was of a good length and I will undoubtedly play it through again numerous times over. However, I felt it was somewhat unrefined though and maybe just falling short of it's true potential... Very much like a bag of sea salt in a learning support classroom.

But any way, I think you definitely gave it a fair and well thought out review.
 

Phoenix Arrow

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,377
0
0
Pyode said:
Also, your use of the term "amateur reviewer" is kind of an offensive way to put it. The fact of the matter is that every one on this forum (including you) are amateur reviewers, so using "amateur" in such a derogatory way insults all of the reviewers on this forum. I'm sure you didn't mean it that way, but that is what it sounds like you are doing.
Oh, I didn't mean it in a derogatory way, I just used the word amateur to determine between the professional websites like IGN or Gamespot from the bloggers and the forum posters. An amateur by definition is someone who doesn't get paid for doing something and that's the boat we're all in.
I do have a habit of saying things that can be taken offensively but I usually don't mean anything by it.

Woodsey said:
Other reviews are decidedly average, so obviously no ones tried to pay them off, which is a pretty weird thing to say by the way OP. It's hardly a common occurrence, and it's a bit insulting to the guys that do this for a living just being slapped with the label of sell-outs (i.e. saying they can't/won't do their job properly).
I know. I wasn't refering to all professional reviewers, but it does seem a bit fishy. Not using this game as an example by the way, I can see why this game could get a bad review, I mean most of the gameplay and combat seemed very love/hate and I guess people like me were the games target audience. What I meant by that is, frequently it seems that when one of the big, popular games comes out, like a GTA4 say, it seems to get glowing reviews everywhere without focussing too much on the flaws. Not saying it's a bad game, but it got prefect scores in a lot of places and it really wasn't a perfect game. But then if a smaller company releases a game, it would get overlooked.

Whatever, it's not important. I guess I'm just a miserable old cynic when it comes to these big review websites. I guess it comes from those old Playstation/Nintendo magazines when no game got less than 4 out of 5 stars.

KillerMidget said:
Is there really such thing as a "good" drug dealer (except the drugs that make you better)?
It's in the way they're portrayed. One drug dealer is part of the family business that loves his son and has a feeble heart. The other is a bastard who kills everyone so he can force Chinese drug addicts to kiss his shoes.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
Phoenix Arrow said:
Pyode said:
Also, your use of the term "amateur reviewer" is kind of an offensive way to put it. The fact of the matter is that every one on this forum (including you) are amateur reviewers, so using "amateur" in such a derogatory way insults all of the reviewers on this forum. I'm sure you didn't mean it that way, but that is what it sounds like you are doing.
Oh, I didn't mean it in a derogatory way, I just used the word amateur to determine between the professional websites like IGN or Gamespot from the bloggers and the forum posters. An amateur by definition is someone who doesn't get paid for doing something and that's the boat we're all in.
I do have a habit of saying things that can be taken offensively but I usually don't mean anything by it.

Woodsey said:
Other reviews are decidedly average, so obviously no ones tried to pay them off, which is a pretty weird thing to say by the way OP. It's hardly a common occurrence, and it's a bit insulting to the guys that do this for a living just being slapped with the label of sell-outs (i.e. saying they can't/won't do their job properly).
I know. I wasn't refering to all professional reviewers, but it does seem a bit fishy. Not using this game as an example by the way, I can see why this game could get a bad review, I mean most of the gameplay and combat seemed very love/hate and I guess people like me were the games target audience. What I meant by that is, frequently it seems that when one of the big, popular games comes out, like a GTA4 say, it seems to get glowing reviews everywhere without focussing too much on the flaws. Not saying it's a bad game, but it got prefect scores in a lot of places and it really wasn't a perfect game. But then if a smaller company releases a game, it would get overlooked.

Whatever, it's not important. I guess I'm just a miserable old cynic when it comes to these big review websites. I guess it comes from those old Playstation/Nintendo magazines when no game got less than 4 out of 5 stars.
Well GTA IV was a much hyped release, and personal input is something that always comes into reviews professional or otherwise. Having said that I'm a firm believer in there being no such thing as a 10/10 game.

That's actually why the only reviewers I trust are PC Gamer, as they've never given a game higher than 96% and they give fairer reviews than the likes of IGN and Gamespot.

Back to WET though, the demo was dreadful so I won't be getting it. I can appreciate a fun game but... WET wasn't at all in any way for me.

It was like anti-fun.
 

Phoenix Arrow

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,377
0
0
Woodsey said:
Well GTA IV was a much hyped release, and personal input is something that always comes into reviews professional or otherwise. Having said that I'm a firm believer in there being no such thing as a 10/10 game.

That's actually why the only reviewers I trust are PC Gamer, as they've never given a game higher than 96% and they give fairer reviews than the likes of IGN and Gamespot.

Back to WET though, the demo was dreadful so I won't be getting it. I can appreciate a fun game but... WET wasn't at all in any way for me.

It was like anti-fun.
Yeah, I probably should've explained my points about reviewers better. They look a bit immature now but hindsight is 20/20. I can respect you not liking it though. I mean, I can understand it being a bit marmite, but I can only judge a game by my own subjective opinion and that was that, for its flaws, it was a fun game.

Macksheath said:
Plus I am fairly disgusted as to how it has a good drug dealer; considering I know first hand what drugs do to people and their families, it grates me to see one. It might be just a mess of pixels, but something about it really gnaws at me.
It's not like a good vs. evil thing and to be honest, the story is a bit goofy. When I called him a good drug dealer, it was very tongue-in-cheek. The guy I described as the evil drug dealer was like cartoon evil. Monopolising cities and employing slaves and torturing people he doesn't like for no apparent reason other than to be a bastard.
The good drug dealer seems to be like just some old guy who happens to have made a fortune selling drugs.
It's a weak story, as I said, but it works well enough to drive the gameplay forward.