A mutual desire to stay alive, help each other.Bulletinmybrain said:That would be a bond of.. Honour? Courage?Incredible Bullshitting Man said:Would it be acceptable to mention Band of Brothers?
I don't think that there's a thread called like that. I was pointing out that it was one sort of those moralist questions I have so very much. The search is in the upper right corner.The Amazing Orgazmo said:That thread sounds awesome?Ronwue said:Isn't this a variation of "If one had to die, who would you choose? Your mom or your significant other/wife". I doubt anyone would say friendships rule over them all.
P.S. By the way, wheres the search feature so I can comment on that thread?
It is exactly strong. All the chemical bonds are strong. And I wasn't representing my choice as the strongest, just as my preferred strong bond, because it's nice and all about sharing among friends.Lukeje said:...not exactly strong though, is it? The strongest bond is the triple bond between two nitrogen atoms. Everybody knows that.SaintWaldo said:Well, the strength of a chemical bond is a function of electronegativity and the valences involved. I personally prefer 3c-2e chemical bonds, because it's a case of 3 sharing 2, and that's just nice.
Not really; Diborane splits apart the first chance it can get (so Much so that you can just treat it as BH[small]3[/small] in equations. It is of course stonger than a Hydrogen bond which is itself stronger than simple Van der Waals forces, but it's still weak in comparison to normal 2c-2e[sup]-[/sup] bonds (just work out the bond-orders if you don't believe me).SaintWaldo said:It is exactly strong. All the chemical bonds are strong. And I wasn't representing my choice as the strongest, just as my preferred strong bond, because it's nice and all about sharing among friends.Lukeje said:...not exactly strong though, is it? The strongest bond is the triple bond between two nitrogen atoms. Everybody knows that.SaintWaldo said:Well, the strength of a chemical bond is a function of electronegativity and the valences involved. I personally prefer 3c-2e chemical bonds, because it's a case of 3 sharing 2, and that's just nice.
Just read wikipedia if you don't believe me.Lukeje said:Not really; Diborane splits apart the first chance it can get (so Much so that you can just treat it as BH[small]3[/small] in equations. It is of course stonger than a Hydrogen bond which is itself stronger than simple Van der Waals forces, but it's still weak in comparison to normal 2c-2e[sup]-[/sup] bonds (just work out the bond-orders if you don't believe me).
Fine; the title is 'Which bond do you think is the strongest'. A 3c-2e[sup]-[/sup] bond is not the strongest (though I will admit it's stronger than most of the bonds like 'love' that people have written). Although you do have to admit that polygamy generally results in weaker bonds than monogamy (so I went along with your joke; happy now?).SaintWaldo said:Just read wikipedia if you don't believe me.Lukeje said:Not really; Diborane splits apart the first chance it can get (so Much so that you can just treat it as BH[small]3[/small] in equations. It is of course stonger than a Hydrogen bond which is itself stronger than simple Van der Waals forces, but it's still weak in comparison to normal 2c-2e[sup]-[/sup] bonds (just work out the bond-orders if you don't believe me).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_bonds#Strong_chemical_bonds
I was talking about the general classification of all chemical bonds as "strong", as the linked article indicates, as my posts indicated, and that you refuse to accept and let be. I was being funny. You are being pedantic and trying to show off. Please stop.