I saw this post
What features would a game have to include for you to consider it worth 12 years' wait? Or at least consider it a good use of the time?
Personally, I would wait 12 years for a game that dispensed bacon every time you complete a mission.
and thought I would ask:Arkynomicon said:The shock with Duke Nukem Forever is that people was curious about what could justify 12 years of development. Turns out there was nothing in it to justify 12 years of development.
What features would a game have to include for you to consider it worth 12 years' wait? Or at least consider it a good use of the time?
Personally, I would wait 12 years for a game that dispensed bacon every time you complete a mission.