What could replace War?

Recommended Videos

Pegghead

New member
Aug 4, 2009
4,014
0
0
My theory is that we could replace war with drinking contests. Germany and Poland have a land dispute? If Das Fuhrer can down more Old Tom then he could be granted the right to move in. Having a little trouble with terrorist groups in the Middle East? If Osama's able to do more shots of extra strength smirnoff then he can blow up all the shit he wants.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
AlexWinter said:
Woodsey said:
AlexWinter said:
Woodsey said:
AkJay said:
Technically, the Nuclear Bomb ended war. with it's creation and first time use, people were scared shitless. Sure, we've had conflicts in the past (Vietnam, Korea) but nothing that would classify as a full-scale war.
True - this is why I'm not sure people who are dead-cert we should all destroy our nukes have properly thought things through.
It's not really peace though is it. It's more like stalemate based on fear. Although I wouldn't put that past Russia either.
Stalemates seem to last a lot longer than peace.
Yeah but what's the point when we're living in as much paranoia as we would be during a war?
In peace, if someone starts to do something a little suspicious, everyone gets major paranoid - and if you're at war already you're going to be more paranoid.
 

The Anhk24

New member
Dec 11, 2009
355
0
0
I don't think anything will replace war, and it will never end because they're will always be a reason to fight
 

Burst6

New member
Mar 16, 2009
916
0
0
the only way war would stop is if there was nothing to fight about. If there is something to fight about, good ol' human nature will make sure people die for it.

but on a less serious side, a pattycake match between two nations, whoever messes up first loses.
 

Cosplay Horatio

New member
May 19, 2009
1,145
0
0
bill0bob said:
Did anyone watch Robot Wars as a kid...

You know the one where father son teams handbuild RC kill bots and make them fight...

Imagine that but with clever people building the robots...

And people inside the robots

Excellent choice!

lvl9000_woot said:
A giant robot battle...perhaps G Gundam style...only in this version America wins and not Japan.

My solution....Robot Jox!!! Even though it's similar I haven't seen Robot Wars yet.
 

Rancid0ffspring

New member
Aug 23, 2009
703
0
0
OptimusPrime33 said:
Xanadu84 said:
The problem with an alternative to war is that if a country wants something bad enough to go to war, when they lose the alternative, they will just ignore the results. And then the only way to stop them is...war. Also, you can't really ignore revolutionaries, as whatever it is they are doing is going to screw up your country. Sadly, there is no alternative to war, you just have to try to avoid war in the first place.

OptimusPrime33 said:
Furburt said:
Football? It's nationalistic and violent enough.
But America would always win! That's the problem, we created football.
Oh boy...be prepared to be teased. For a little future foresight, go wiki or google Football first, my fellow American.
Why wiki it? I know in other countries soccer is called football. Ive gone to Europe.
I could be wrong but as far as I'm aware American football is the bastard child of English football (soccer)
 

Fetzenfisch

New member
Sep 11, 2009
2,454
0
0
dietpeachsnapple said:
A constitutional requirement that anyone who votes for a country to GO to war, has to fight on the front lines.
thats actually it yes. Now i just have to rule the world to get this thing through

a bonus is, the idiots who actually do sign can kill each other and we get rid of them.
 

The_ModeRazor

New member
Jul 29, 2009
2,835
0
0
Easy: the guys at the heads of states go into an arena, and fight to the death with each other.
And lions.
 

Randoms

New member
Dec 11, 2009
1,014
0
0
how about good old fisticuffs between the leader of the two countries. Either that or a war like the Cold War, noone attacks cause they're afraid of retaliation.
 

AlexWinter

New member
Jun 24, 2009
401
0
0
Woodsey said:
AlexWinter said:
Woodsey said:
AlexWinter said:
Woodsey said:
AkJay said:
Technically, the Nuclear Bomb ended war. with it's creation and first time use, people were scared shitless. Sure, we've had conflicts in the past (Vietnam, Korea) but nothing that would classify as a full-scale war.
True - this is why I'm not sure people who are dead-cert we should all destroy our nukes have properly thought things through.
It's not really peace though is it. It's more like stalemate based on fear. Although I wouldn't put that past Russia either.
Stalemates seem to last a lot longer than peace.
Yeah but what's the point when we're living in as much paranoia as we would be during a war?
In peace, if someone starts to do something a little suspicious, everyone gets major paranoid - and if you're at war already you're going to be more paranoid.
So we're agreeing?