What historical famous person do you hate?

Recommended Videos

Caligulove

New member
Sep 25, 2008
3,029
0
0
Besides the usual.

Swedish Chef- popularizing a racist charicature, yes Im totally serious :p[footnote]Bork bork, ************[/footnote]
Genghis Khan
Joseph McCarthy
Edgar Allen Poe[footnote]not so much hate, but he has such punchable face[/footnote]
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
DiscoveryOne said:
Besides the usual.

Swedish Chef- popularizing a racist charicature, yes Im totally serious :p[footnote]Bork bork, ************[/footnote]
Genghis Khan
Joseph McCarthy
Edgar Allen Poe[footnote]not so much hate, but he has such punchable face[/footnote]
Not a Muppet :(. You monster!

The Muppets should get back on TV. Their Youtube stuff is always heartwarming and funny. Muppets - Laughtrack = Comedy Gold.

Shame you can't strip the laugh track from the old stuff :(. That's the only reason I can't watch it anymore.
 

Samcanuck

New member
Nov 26, 2009
678
0
0
Kaiser Jon said:
Samcanuck said:
Mechanix said:
Back in the days, what are some very famous people, those that stand out, do you hate?

For me, I just can't stand General George Patton. The guy is a total prick and one of the most closed-minded people ever to exist. He would kick soldiers out of hospitals for shell shock, because he didn't understand that not everyone loved war and killing Germans like him. He lived for war, nothing else was interesting to him. That's a pretty sick person in my book. This would never be tolerated in today's military.

He even made some dumb speech, which is probably the most unmotivating speech I've ever read. It basically said "You are all here to fight, and kill krauts. You will do this without question. Go do it, sons-of-bitches." Gee, thanks George, that sure motivated the troops. That they are just slaves here to do your dirty work, awesome.
Okay look, most people are going to say Hitler right? This I don't get. Didn't Stalin have over 3 times killed in his Gulag's by overworking them? You know, the whole making the horse into glue after breaking him in Animal Farm by Orsen Wells. So why does everyone say Hitler? I mean, I'll give him #2 spot...but the worst. By pure numbers....hands down. And if you don't think it was partly due to racism, look at how many Ukranians were killed.

Different forms of torture used in either case...but torture, death, mass and selective killings and the destruction of the history of many families existance. Lots more people got these same treatments...thats pretty bad.
Well you'd say Hitler too if you were Jewish...

If I had to count out mass-murderers, I'd probably go with Martin Luther (NOT MLK). The guy was an insane little racist.
What, why? do I have to say three times more again?
 

Skuffyshootster

New member
Jan 13, 2009
2,753
0
0
Mechanix said:
Back in the days, what are some very famous people, those that stand out, do you hate?

For me, I just can't stand General George Patton. The guy is a total prick and one of the most closed-minded people ever to exist. He would kick soldiers out of hospitals for shell shock, because he didn't understand that not everyone loved war and killing Germans like him. He lived for war, nothing else was interesting to him. That's a pretty sick person in my book. This would never be tolerated in today's military.

He even made some dumb speech, which is probably the most unmotivating speech I've ever read. It basically said "You are all here to fight, and kill krauts. You will do this without question. Go do it, sons-of-bitches." Gee, thanks George, that sure motivated the troops. That they are just slaves here to do your dirty work, awesome.
He also slapped people.

OT: Christopher Colombus. What a dick.
 

Nomad

Dire Penguin
Aug 3, 2008
616
0
0
I don't really "hate" anyone... But I suppose I should go with Adam Smith, for coining the phrase and idea of the "invisible hand", which has - in my opinion - been the cause of a lot of human suffering.

DRTJR said:
Karl Marx, and Adam Smith
Why? Putting Marx and Smith in the same box is an interesting choice, seeing as they had rather opposite political views.

Irishhoodlum said:
Reagan, a popular idiot who was fucking retarded. Seriously, a "star wars defense program"? And the guy is still hailed as a genius hero politician today, "the next Reagan" is supposed to a compliment? WHAT IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE. Bringing me to my next point, conservative talk show hosts that exist only to make money and ruin their party.
Har har, yeah, Reagan was a funny character. Not because he had a fine sense of humour, but rather because he was comically irrational.

Furioso said:
The fact that you quote wikipedia makes your entire arguement invalid, find a more trustworthy source
The article he points towards is properly referenced, which means the facts stated in there are likely to be true. Not to mention that it's a rather popular subject as well, meaning it's heavily moderated. Wikipedia isn't inherently worthless. It's a fine nexus of knowledge. You just have to make sure it's properly referenced from reliable sources before quoting it.
 

DRTJR

New member
Aug 7, 2009
651
0
0
Nomad said:
DRTJR said:
Karl Marx, and Adam Smith
Why? Putting Marx and Smith in the same box is an interesting choice, seeing as they had rather opposite political views.
Those asshats are responsible for 1/3 of the flame wars on the internet
 

Samcanuck

New member
Nov 26, 2009
678
0
0
SonicKoala said:
Samcanuck said:
No...Stalin just ushered in the actual Cold War...which If I'm not mistaken, we still suffer from today.

What can you see in direct consequence due to only Hitler, since Stalin and Hitler had an arms race during the prewar crisis of WW2. It was Hitlers desire to take out Sadam first that began his invasion of Czechoslavakia (just as much as the rineland to conflict a two prong war)...Both people impacted the pre WW2 and WW2 era since both the Gulag killings and holocaust happened at the same time (but Stalin killed OVER 3 times). Within that each share the consequence of the Cold war, though Stalin had an active role DURING the Cold war. Only thing I can see Hilter had a direct connection with that Saddam didn't is the Palistien/Israeli conflict.

So in a way...yes...Stalin did help usher in the biggest war in modern history by pushing Hitlers war train. EDIT:and pushing his own war train...not to mention his invasions and creating of the iron curtian...how many died because of that?

Plus over three times the torture deaths.
Stalin didn't single-handedly usher in the Cold War, the Cold War was the result of growing tensions between the Soviet Union and the United States that began in World War 2, don't put the blame soley on the Soviets, because that's ignorant. And why are you talking about Hitler's desire to take out "Sadam"? And what the fuck do you mean "just as much as the rhineland to conflict a two prong war"? What the hell does that even mean? And the Gulags weren't "killing camps", they were labour camps. The concentration camps, on the other hand, in the latter days of World War 2, were full-blown death camps - the Holocaust is so significant because of how methodical and meticulous it was; deaths on account of Stalin's policies were often just byproducts of his policies - in the case of Hitler, the death of the Jews and other groups WAS the policy. Sure, Stalin did order the deaths of many people, but nothing on the scale of the Holocaust. And no, Stalin didn't have much of an active role during the Cold War - Stalin died in 1953, long before the Cold War really "took off". Sure, he was active in its beginnings, but the hottest points of the Cold War didn't really occur until the early 60s, and the 80s with Reagen.

Oh, and I don't know what this "arms race" was that apparently took place between Hitler and Stalin in the lead up to World War 2 - you are aware that in 1938 Stalin had almost every single leader in the Soviet army killed, right? Stalin was by no means active in ANY kind of arms race, I have no idea where you're getting this information; Stalin was fully convinced that Hitler would NOT invade the USSR (as indicated by the Nazi-Soviet pact of 1938), and the Soviet army was relatively primative in its technology up until 1942-1943, when the Nazi invasion of the USSR forced them to shape-up. Also, please be aware that Stalin's "creaton" of the iron curtain, as you put it, was not intentional. The iron curtain (a term coined by Winston Churchill, btw, after WW2) was a direct result of World War 2, which was, and I am willing to defend this point, ENTIRELY Hitler's and Nazi Germany's fault. The people who died to "create" the iron curtain were pretty much all Nazis, by the way (at least in its original form following the end of World War 2).

And finally, "Only thing I can see Hitler had a direct connection with that Saddam (do you mean Stalin?) didn't is the Palistien/Israeli conflict"? What the fuck? Hitler didn't have a connection with that at all.... Israel wasn't even a state when Hitler was around.
No, but to say in comparison to Stalin that Hitler ushered in the cold war by comparison I feel makes me arguably correct. It is never just one persons cause.
Whether your feelings toward mass murder are more responsive to Hitler than Stalin, I'd rather send you to "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag" than actually argue each point in referance to the Gulags being just labour camps. Jesus...even if 1/3 of the people were specific people sent to the gulags for political affiliation or nationality, have you not read of the mass random capture and killings of Stalin?

If you do not know about the industrialisation of both Germany and Russia during that time, here's a quick referance.
"War and Stalinist industrial−military development
Although the Soviet Union received aid and weapons from the United States under the lend-lease program, the Soviet production of war materials was greater than that of Nazi Germany because of rapid growth of Soviet industrial production during the interwar years (additional supplies from lend−lease accounted for about 10?12% of the Soviet Union's own industrial output).[citation needed] The Second Five Year Plan raised steel production to 18 million tons and coal to 128 million tons.[citation needed] Before it was interrupted, the Third Five Year Plan produced no less than 19 million tons of steel and 150 million tons of coal.[citation needed]

The Soviet Union's industrial output provided an armaments industry which supported their army, helping it resist the Nazi military offensive. According to Robert L. Hutchings, "One can hardly doubt that if there had been a slower buildup of industry, the attack would have been successful and world history would have evolved quite differently."[citation needed] For the laborers involved in industry, however, life was difficult. Workers were encouraged to fulfill and overachieve quotas through propaganda, such as the Stakhanovite movement. Between 1933 and 1945, some[who?] argue that seven million civilians died because of the demanding labor. Between 1930 and 1940, 6 million were put through the forced labor system
" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Soviet_Union_(1927-1953)#War_and_Stalinist_industrial.E2.88.92military_development

The mass movement of thousands of Jewish people to Palistien following WW2 is where I get that. I have read it was a motivation due to the concentration camps of WW2....are you going to dispute this? Or do I need to do a quick reference check on this too?

You know, I like your thought through argument, but I'm not going to sit here all day and pull apart your retort on shit you can search for in 5 freaken minutes.
And as far as spelling, I COULD spell check, but if you can understand it, wtf...who cares kid.
And besides, all you are attempting to defeat is a flimsy response on Hitler not the direct cause of starting WW2 (which their are a Lot of factors, as specified in my first line). Big deal man, How many war's has the U.S sparked. War does not make a leader 'evil' in my eye's. Mass executions in efforts of power and genocide are however...and Stalin wins on both Quality and Quantity in my books. Your opinion may be different, but it doesnt make mine wrong. Get what I'm saying? And the two prong war thing...are you seriously trying to dispute Hitlers war tactics here? I can't even believe your arguing this point when you know Hitler mobilized against Stalin after their alliance fell through. Geeze.

I get the feeling you are taking this shit to heart, where as I'm rather light hearted about it. Take a breath, cool down and realize it's an interpretation that began awhile back with me asking a quesion.
 

thylasos

New member
Aug 12, 2009
1,920
0
0
Thatcher. Emperor Constantine I of the Roman Empire. Joseph Menghele. Batista. Pinochet.
 

Earthmonger

Apple Blossoms
Feb 10, 2009
489
0
0
Jesus Christ. Though not historical, his character is certainly famous. What a damned wuss. Burn in Hell, bastard.

As another mentioned, Walt Disney. Responsible for the conformist christian cult that is the Walt Disney Co.

Flavius Heraclius Augustus, who failed to completely annihilate Israel in the 620s, which might have averted 14 more centuries of utterly pointless bloodshed.
 

cuddly_tomato

New member
Nov 12, 2008
3,404
0
0
Whoever never invented drithealis (it is a special chemical you smear on injuries which heals them instantly). Never heard of it? That is because a particular person never invented it, the lazy bastard! It is him I hate.
 

Nomad

Dire Penguin
Aug 3, 2008
616
0
0
cuddly_tomato said:
Whoever never invented drithealis (it is a special chemical you smear on injuries which heals them instantly). Never heard of it? That is because a particular person never invented it, the lazy bastard! It is him I hate.
Was it you?

x0ny said:
Tojo (the prime minister)
Why him? Why not Fumimaro Konoe or Kuniaki Koiso, who were arguably doing the same things?