Okay, this has been going on for about 10 pages and I'm surprised nobody has made any progress. Apparently nobody explained it well enough that there are different genres in anime just like in any other medium. You have your romance anime, you have your action anime, you got your comedy anime, and hell, you even have your family friendly anime.
I could go on and on with a huge wall of text (I'm sure I probably will) explaining how there are differing types of genres in anime and to then compare American animation and Japanese animation and how, just like in Japan, there are differing types of genres in American animation. Would I say that Disney's Beauty and the Beast is the same genre as "Stewie Griffin: The Untold Story"? Hell no. Same with "Spirited Away" and "Akira" Same genre? Both movies couldn't be any more different. The only commonalities that they share are that:
1. They are movies
2. They are animated
The same can be said about paintings. Compare the "Mona Lisa" to "The Persistence of Memory"
Same with music. Compare Country with R&B.
Same with Film. Compare "Citizen Kane" with "Bad Boys 2"
This "anime is a medium" debate is going nowhere. How about we think of it this way: Animation is just a tool they use to tell a story. Just a tool. Take "Naruto", for example. It could have used a real set with real actors and real props, but they didn't. They used animation instead. "The Dark Knight" could have been animated if they wanted. Hell, there has been an animated TV show called "The Adventures of Batman and Robin", which also had an animated theatrical spinoff called "Batman: Rise of the Phantasm" They could have done it with real actors and real settings just like Adam West's "Batman". But they didn't. They used animation. (It's also a helluva good movie, I recommend it to anyone who is a Batman fan.)
The thing with Japan is that it mainly uses animation to tell their stories. That's not to say that they don't also do live stuff though, because they do. "Mother" for instance, isn't animated. There is also a live action remake of the animated movie "Grave of the Fireflies" saying that Japan only has animated shows is an outright lie.
Art is also a completely subjective form of expression too. If you're asking me what is so great about anime, then I'm afraid that I can't really make you see what I see. However, I do sympathize with you on some of the shows that you watched. I think that Naruto is fucking annoying and stupid. I haven't even touched Code Geass. I liked Gurren Lagann up until the ending, which got too crazy (even by the show's craziness) that it got stupid.
There is also one thing that hasn't really been touched on:
It's Japan. Different culture. Different ethics. Different everything. Of course most of the stuff that they pump out is going to be weird, and the majority of the people who watch it might be strange as well (hence the "Kawaii Desu!" girl D< ) I personally am very picky when it comes to anime because I usually like a very well grounded story that can take itself seriously. I usually have to dig around a bit before finding something that suits me. I enjoy anime from time to time (because I have a little bit of a taste for animation) with a good show that tells an interesting story. I usually divert from the mainstream and go for the ones that are a little less appreciated and tamer (not the ones that are in your face with craziness and fanservice). And I also try to not even compare myself to the crazed "Kawaii Desu!" otaku fan. Because, quite frankly, they freak me out as well.
That's why I enjoy anime, just like how I enjoy movies and film in general. If you still don't understand then that's fine by me because you don't have to understand it. You can go about with your life, appreciate what you think is great, I can go about my life and appreciate what I think is great. "To each his own" right?
I've said my piece. I'm done.
I could go on and on with a huge wall of text (I'm sure I probably will) explaining how there are differing types of genres in anime and to then compare American animation and Japanese animation and how, just like in Japan, there are differing types of genres in American animation. Would I say that Disney's Beauty and the Beast is the same genre as "Stewie Griffin: The Untold Story"? Hell no. Same with "Spirited Away" and "Akira" Same genre? Both movies couldn't be any more different. The only commonalities that they share are that:
1. They are movies
2. They are animated
The same can be said about paintings. Compare the "Mona Lisa" to "The Persistence of Memory"
Same with music. Compare Country with R&B.
Same with Film. Compare "Citizen Kane" with "Bad Boys 2"
This "anime is a medium" debate is going nowhere. How about we think of it this way: Animation is just a tool they use to tell a story. Just a tool. Take "Naruto", for example. It could have used a real set with real actors and real props, but they didn't. They used animation instead. "The Dark Knight" could have been animated if they wanted. Hell, there has been an animated TV show called "The Adventures of Batman and Robin", which also had an animated theatrical spinoff called "Batman: Rise of the Phantasm" They could have done it with real actors and real settings just like Adam West's "Batman". But they didn't. They used animation. (It's also a helluva good movie, I recommend it to anyone who is a Batman fan.)
The thing with Japan is that it mainly uses animation to tell their stories. That's not to say that they don't also do live stuff though, because they do. "Mother" for instance, isn't animated. There is also a live action remake of the animated movie "Grave of the Fireflies" saying that Japan only has animated shows is an outright lie.
Art is also a completely subjective form of expression too. If you're asking me what is so great about anime, then I'm afraid that I can't really make you see what I see. However, I do sympathize with you on some of the shows that you watched. I think that Naruto is fucking annoying and stupid. I haven't even touched Code Geass. I liked Gurren Lagann up until the ending, which got too crazy (even by the show's craziness) that it got stupid.
There is also one thing that hasn't really been touched on:
It's Japan. Different culture. Different ethics. Different everything. Of course most of the stuff that they pump out is going to be weird, and the majority of the people who watch it might be strange as well (hence the "Kawaii Desu!" girl D< ) I personally am very picky when it comes to anime because I usually like a very well grounded story that can take itself seriously. I usually have to dig around a bit before finding something that suits me. I enjoy anime from time to time (because I have a little bit of a taste for animation) with a good show that tells an interesting story. I usually divert from the mainstream and go for the ones that are a little less appreciated and tamer (not the ones that are in your face with craziness and fanservice). And I also try to not even compare myself to the crazed "Kawaii Desu!" otaku fan. Because, quite frankly, they freak me out as well.
That's why I enjoy anime, just like how I enjoy movies and film in general. If you still don't understand then that's fine by me because you don't have to understand it. You can go about with your life, appreciate what you think is great, I can go about my life and appreciate what I think is great. "To each his own" right?
I've said my piece. I'm done.