Oo Rev oO said:
Barret REC7-M468. Too expensive for the US military. Thats how you know its awesome.
Because it's far too costly to replace their stock of 5.56 munitions, as well as pay for over-priced upper recievers for the M4? Try the HKM417: It's actually worth what it costs and was designed for the modern battlefield. So it's a M4 upper receiver with a bunch of extra rails and cubby holes and shit. Stop mentioning guns that are noting but rechambered versions of existing weapons. It's lazy, is what it is.
GruntOwner said:
TheSapphireKnight said:
Connor Lonske said:
Who needs assault rifles when you have sexy ass guns like the P90?
If you like that you'll love this...
I was just about to say that The F2000 always makes me feel warm and fuzzy.
I suppose given that Kalashnikova sat down and thought about every battle he'd ever fought while designing the AKM, it's gonna be the most suitable weapon for most combat situations, so probably one of the updated AKs... Even if the F2000 is just so damn sexy. I'm no gun nut, I have hardly any idea how they work and I'm a terrible marksman but, well... Just look at it. Like black granite sculpted with a massive hard on for sci fi looking stuff.
It lacks lots of little flashing/pulsing lights. It's not sci-fi, it just looks like poorly set plastic or epoxy or something.
RAKtheUndead said:
Connor Lonske said:
Who needs assault rifles when you have sexy ass guns like the P90?
Oh, god, I can't wait to write that section on my Probing The Inaccuracies thread. You people thinking that the P90 is so spectacular are going to be so savaged.
It's a wonderful weapon, in theory, and Counter Strike. There's a reason it's not the standard issue weapon, though. Can't wait to hear your take on it.
GRANDMAAAAA said:
Try finding an AK-47. They don't fucking exist anymore. 47 stands for the year 1947 when production began, you'd have to steal it from a fucking museum or some ones grandfather. When you say "yeh I'd go fer a ak47 lulz," all you are really saying is that you would want an AK-74 or one of the Chinese clones of the 47. All of which are basically as reliable as the original model, with differences in caliber and quality of material.
Damnit.
Anyway. That aside I would probably choose some bullpup rifle design. They allow for longer barrel length in a smaller overall package, plus I am right handed so I wouldn't have to be massively alarmed about building corners.
It's Automovat Klashinaokv model of 1947. That's when it was designed and went into production. The term "AK-47" refers to any number of guns that use this design, whether they be Chinese, Russian, Soviet-era, Chezch, DDR, or any other number of nation that can make this easily produced and assembled weapon. The thing has like three goddamned moving parts, counting the bullets.
US Crash Fire said:
Rigs83 said:
US Crash Fire said:
Rigs83 said:
US Crash Fire said:
Rigs83 said:
Americans, we're like Nazis we kill the weak too.
you shouldnt post anymore.
its shit like thats that people need to remember when they wonder why our country has such a bad reputation!
even if your joking all it takes is for this to be seen by someone who thinks your serious.
You do realize you are asking me to give up my right to free speech because you don't like what I said. If I do will you promise to make the trains run on time and punish the traitors to fatherland?
I quote Ian Kershaw "The path to Auschwitz was paved with indifference." Mindless flag waving allowed an unjustifiable war to start that has ended the lives of well over three thousands US Soldiers,Marines, Air Force and Navy personnel who bravely volunteered to serve. The money invested in fighting the Iraq War could literally provide affordable health care to every US citizen, improve and build schools so US students can compete abroad academically and eventually economically as entrepreneurs and workers thus repaying every dollar spent several times over. I may say nasty things because America is not weak and does not needs it's feeling protected. We all have to face cold hard truths about what we have and are doing at home and abroad and actually change for the better as individuals and as a nation.
im not FORCING you to give up anything. i am merely making a sugestion. you have the right to say what you like, but that doesnt always mean its a good fucking idea.
I said that you
asked me to give up my rights not
forced. Now if you forced me to give up my right to free speech than the Second Amendment may or may not come into play. Now if what I say is slander than a judge can stop me or fine me or if what I say is a threat to you or the public than the authorities have the right to stop me and if I resist the right to use lethal force to stop me.
exactly. i asked. i have the right to ask you to do something. doesnt mean you have to comply. you have the right to say what you want and i have the right to tell you to fuck off. your not forcing me to believe as you do and im not forcing you to shut the fuck up.
YAY we're both exercising our rights!

so you can continue to spew your anti-american hatred and i will continue to laugh at your childish idealistic views.
His point is that he offered his opinion and all you had to say is "Shut up, you shouldn't talk", but, of course, in much poorer form. If anything, you shouldn't be the one to post anymore since you clearly lack the ability to communicate peacefully with others. You're like the now-banned Indigo Dingo; "People have different opinions than me? Then they clearly are WRONG and I must be a semi-snarky dick about it! (PS3!PS3!PS3!PS3!PS3!PS3!PS3!PS3!)"
Also, seriously people, what the fuck, images go in spoiler tags, this is not hard.