Fleetfiend said:I have a feeling the next ME game is going to be set in the First Contact War. However, I hope them come up with something more interesting than that, mainly because I would like to see the other races besides the Turians, and I don't want to shoot them in the face. :3
There's not really much to the First Contact War though. It basically boils down to "Turian patrol destroys Human exploratory vessels. Humans return and destroy Turian patrol. Turians respond by making Shanxi it's *****. Human Second Fleet arrives and fucks Turian shit up. Council steps in with a "dudes, chill". A 3 month battle where the Turians spent most of the time chucking debris at cities while the humans ran around hoping not to get crushed doesn't sound particularly interesting. And the only event worth doing was already done in a prequel book.LadyDeadly said:Firefly +DR WHO + Mass Effect2 = ME4
but really, it might be the first contact war or maybe something with the prior civilizations that were wiped out before the protheans.or maybe something with protheans.
So, that's what I think their options are - far future or past.DoPo said:Or a very much existent if BioWare decide to make something after the apocalypse. It doesn't need to even have Shepard in it, so they would have kept their end of the bargain and finished with Shepard's story (he/she could make cameos if alive).Bara_no_Hime said:I didn't like the ending, but the ending didn't invalidate anything. If you're upset because the ending doesn't address your decisions, then that's a different thing to be upset over. However, just because they aren't addressed doesn't mean they don't matter - they do. After the credits roll, to everyone living in that universe. The results aren't part of the story - they're part of a non-existent epilogue.
But I don't see a good way of continuing the ME franchise after what all that's happened. I suppose there are overall two ways to handle everything a) have game(s) set before ME1 - play as part of humanity exploring space for the first time and that sort of thing. No clashes with variable lore (Shepard's actions) so no problems (potentially) b) Set the game in the far future. 100, 200 or maybe 500 years later. Shepard is good and gone, some of his actions wouldn't matter in the current point in time but the decisions could be addressed and referred to if you import a save. It's easy to make a more organic story as well, and set incompatible choices aside (if you didn't kill the Rachni they might have been wiped out by something else, just as an example).
There is potential of doing more with the franchise and I doubt BioWare will just scrap it...although the outcry after ME3 may make them consider postponing. And postponing may be as bad as scrapping it if not worse.
They've already announced that there will be more Mass Effect games, just no more featuring Shepard as the main character.ThePS1Fan said:Let's assume for a moment that Bioware does fix the ME3 ending fiasco and manages to regain some PR, how should they continue this franchise?
Of course there are way too many hypotheticals for how Bioware could fix ME3's ending so lets go off the assumption that the Indoctrination Theory is correct and Shepard wakes up on Earth and stops the Reapers for real however your Shepard would, Heroic Sacrifice, Pistol and butter knife, doesn't matter, Shepard wins, Reapers are stopped. I just want to know within this lore (I've never read any of the books) what could really happen to keep things interesting after the Reapers were stopped? Or should 3 be the final instalment in the franchise altogether?
Captcha: make a bee-line
Is it telling me to head for my flame bunker after mentioning the possibility for ME4 right now?
That could be very, very cool.Ironman126 said:An RTS. Please, please, please an RTS. How I have longed for a sequel to Homeworld 2. A Mass Effect RTS could have to potential to be that spiritual sequel.
Even if they fix the ending, they shouldn't. The series was hard set to being a trilogy, and aftering beating the horrors from beyond the galaxy, I am pretty sure their is no threat that can match up to that.ThePS1Fan said:Let's assume for a moment that Bioware does fix the ME3 ending fiasco and manages to regain some PR, how should they continue this franchise?
Of course there are way too many hypotheticals for how Bioware could fix ME3's ending so lets go off the assumption that the Indoctrination Theory is correct and Shepard wakes up on Earth and stops the Reapers for real however your Shepard would, Heroic Sacrifice, Pistol and butter knife, doesn't matter, Shepard wins, Reapers are stopped. I just want to know within this lore (I've never read any of the books) what could really happen to keep things interesting after the Reapers were stopped? Or should 3 be the final instalment in the franchise altogether?
Captcha: make a bee-line
Is it telling me to head for my flame bunker after mentioning the possibility for ME4 right now?
That'd be a weird one, interesting though. And possibly awful, not sure Bioware have ever made RTS before.Ironman126 said:An RTS. Please, please, please an RTS. How I have longed for a sequel to Homeworld 2. A Mass Effect RTS could have to potential to be that spiritual sequel.
Which is why I hope they come up with something more interesting.wintercoat said:There's not really much to the First Contact War though. It basically boils down to "Turian patrol destroys Human exploratory vessels. Humans return and destroy Turian patrol. Turians respond by making Shanxi it's *****. Human Second Fleet arrives and fucks Turian shit up. Council steps in with a "dudes, chill". A 3 month battle where the Turians spent most of the time chucking debris at cities while the humans ran around hoping not to get crushed doesn't sound particularly interesting. And the only event worth doing was already done in a prequel book.