And who are you to know exactly what they are thinking?Novskij said:I dont give much of a shit if a band is mainstream or not, but when a band turns to trying to be mainstream, their trying to sell, therefore their very likely to stop being original and creative and go for a shitty formula that makes money.Nincompoop said:More or less make a tad bit more complicated music, and maybe something that has grown on them over the years.
I really hate characters like you. Just telling you. Don't f**king judge any band. Ever. And I can't speak on behalf of everybody else, but I hate threads like these. It's like the authors want a f**king medal for being anti-mainstream.
Music style is less important than what actually is happening in the song. Something can sound mainstream'ish sound, but the chords and tone material could be something you like.
There are lots of mainstream songs I do not like, but not because they are mainstream. In the same sense, there are some I really like. Shoot me, but I happen to like Girls Don't Cry or whatever tha hell that song is named, by Fergie. I mostly listen e.g. Shinedown, Trivium and Avenged Sevenfold.
My point is, mostly what people call mainstream has a certain sound, but it is not what is most important.
Mainstream is fake, but anti-mainstream is just as fake. This thread, in my opinion, smelled of exactly that.
..
By sound I mean one of the three important factors of music. Tonality (chords 'n' stuff) and rhythm (when and how long everything is) are the primary, and then sound (singer's voice, distortion effects, and in larger perspective what we sometimes use to compare bands) comes next.