Cite some sources that haven't been refuted. Even Penn & Teller retracted their claims on that front.MulticolorCharizard said:
What would you ban?
- Thread starter willsham45
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I'd ban admission restrictions for all university students trying to get into the Master of Education studies. A little specific, I know, but this is going to give me a fucking ulcer one of these days. I'm studying to be a teacher, and the harder of the two subjects I study has a grade average attached to its Master studies prerequisites.
Problem 1: If you fail to stay below the set average you'll be barred from entering the Master studies. You don't get put on a waiting list, you get the "Thanks for playing" card.
Problem 2: As a teacher, nobody hires you if you don't have a Master's degree in all of your study branches.
Seriously, this shit has started giving me nightmares. If I don't make that damn average grade I've flushed 3 years of my life down the toilet, which I can't afford.
Problem 1: If you fail to stay below the set average you'll be barred from entering the Master studies. You don't get put on a waiting list, you get the "Thanks for playing" card.
Problem 2: As a teacher, nobody hires you if you don't have a Master's degree in all of your study branches.
Seriously, this shit has started giving me nightmares. If I don't make that damn average grade I've flushed 3 years of my life down the toilet, which I can't afford.
You'd ban...failure? Like everybody just gets to do whatever he or she wants to do with no standards applied to it?Sonicron said:
To ban:
Censorship and laws criminalizing victimless crimes.
If there's no victim, why is it a crime?
Oh, also efforts to ban internet anonymity and undermine privacy rights.
Censorship and laws criminalizing victimless crimes.
If there's no victim, why is it a crime?
Oh, also efforts to ban internet anonymity and undermine privacy rights.
It's actually:Zeeky_Santos said:
[HEADING=3]SHUT[/HEADING]
[HEADING=2]DOWN[/HEADING]
[HEADING=1]EVERYTHING[/HEADING]
Pandemic's funny.
OT: Eh... The subway. I hate the subway. Please make a new transport system.
Oh, and those trains that have no rooms inside. Yeah.
That's...oddly specific.Outasight said:
And where'd you find a 12 year old who knows what she's doing? (ba-dum psssh!)
They used to say that about homosexuality. And interracial couples, too. "It's icky so we must stop them!"Outasight said:
Insipidness aside EDIT FOR NINJAS:
He says it better than my half-asleep brains can. But thanks for jumping to pedophilia to try and make me feel guilty about liking freedom, though.Zeeky_Santos said:
EDIT AGAIN: Though I should keep the part where I mention that consent doesn't just mean not saying no. That's an important thing to remember.
ONE MORE TIME: Also, to give more of a substantial answer for general cases, either the younger one can give consent, and all that happens is you think it's icky because of an age difference; OR it's not a victimless crime because the younger one can't consent. So, that doesn't even address victimless crimes at all. But again, thanks for trying to bring the Pedo Hunt into this to do... whatever you meant to do, but unfortunately you can't have your cake (it's victimless) and eat it too (it's molestation).
HUH: "Discredit me"? I had no idea I typed that. It sounds stupid. Also has nothing to do with anything.
I would hope everybody agrees that a 12 year old is constitutionally incapable of consenting to something like that with an adult. If he wanted to make it challenging he should have mentioned two 12 year olds in which case there's no obvious predator involved.
